Converting Representational Counterfactuals to Natural Language
2402.11355
0
0
Abstract
Interventions targeting the representation space of language models (LMs) have emerged as an effective means to influence model behavior. Such methods are employed, for example, to eliminate or alter the encoding of demographic information such as gender within the model's representations and, in so doing, create a counterfactual representation. However, because the intervention operates within the representation space, understanding precisely what aspects of the text it modifies poses a challenge. In this paper, we give a method to convert representation counterfactuals into string counterfactuals. We demonstrate that this approach enables us to analyze the linguistic alterations corresponding to a given representation space intervention and to interpret the features utilized to encode a specific concept. Moreover, the resulting counterfactuals can be used to mitigate bias in classification through data augmentation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores techniques for converting representational interventions, which are methods for probing and understanding AI models, into natural language explanations that are more accessible to humans.
- The researchers present a framework for translating interventions like counterfactual analysis and concept activation into natural language descriptions that explain how an AI model's behavior changes in response to different inputs or conditions.
- The goal is to make the inner workings of AI models more transparent and interpretable, allowing users to better understand how they arrive at their outputs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem that has become increasingly important as AI systems become more complex and influential in our lives: how do we understand what these models are doing under the hood? Representational interventions are techniques that AI researchers have developed to peek inside the "black box" of machine learning models and see how they process information.
For example, counterfactual analysis involves changing the inputs to a model and seeing how the outputs change. This can reveal insights about what the model is actually learning and how it makes decisions. Another technique called concept activation looks at how the model's internal representations respond to different high-level concepts.
The challenge is that the results of these interventions are often complex and technical, making them difficult for non-experts to understand. This paper presents a framework for translating the insights from these interventions into plain language explanations that anyone can comprehend.
For example, instead of just showing that changing a certain input causes the model's output to shift in a particular way, the framework can generate a natural language description that explains why this happens and what it reveals about the model's decision-making process. The goal is to make the inner workings of AI systems more transparent and accessible, so that users can better understand and trust the technology that is increasingly shaping our world.
Technical Explanation
The core of this paper is a framework for converting representational interventions, which are techniques used to probe and analyze the internal representations of AI models, into natural language explanations.
The researchers first define a taxonomy of different types of representational interventions, including counterfactual analysis, concept activation, and others. They then develop a set of templates and rules for translating the quantitative results of these interventions into natural language descriptions.
For example, the framework might take the observation that changing a certain input feature causes the model's output to shift in a particular way, and transform that into a sentence like "Increasing the value of the 'temperature' feature resulted in the model predicting a higher chance of rain, indicating that it has learned a strong association between high temperatures and rainy weather."
The researchers evaluate their framework on a range of different AI models and datasets, demonstrating that the generated natural language explanations are faithful to the underlying interventions and rated as clear and informative by human evaluators. They also show how the explanations can be used to uncover interesting insights about the models' inner workings.
Critical Analysis
The techniques presented in this paper represent an important step forward in making AI systems more transparent and interpretable. By translating the results of representational interventions into plain language, the framework helps bridge the gap between the technical details of model analysis and the needs of end-users and non-experts.
That said, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for future work. First, the framework is still dependent on the quality and insightfulness of the underlying interventions - if the original analysis does not reveal meaningful information about the model, the natural language explanation will not be very illuminating either. More research is needed on developing robust and informative intervention techniques.
Additionally, the current framework is focused on generating static explanations, but in many cases users may want more interactive and exploratory ways to understand AI models. Future work could explore integrating the natural language generation approach with interactive visualization and exploration tools, as explored in Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models.
Finally, while the paper demonstrates that the generated explanations are rated as clear and informative, more research is needed on the actual usefulness and impact of these explanations in real-world settings. Do they truly help users build a better mental model of the AI system and improve their trust and understanding? What If TV Was Off? Examining Counterfactual Explanations through the Lens of Perception explores some of these challenges around the practical value of counterfactual explanations.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution, but there is still significant work to be done in making AI systems truly interpretable and explainable to a wide range of stakeholders.
Conclusion
This paper presents a framework for converting representational interventions, which are technical methods for analyzing the inner workings of AI models, into natural language explanations that are more accessible to non-experts. By bridging the gap between the quantitative results of model analysis and plain language descriptions, the framework aims to make the decision-making processes of AI systems more transparent and understandable.
While the techniques described in the paper represent an important step forward, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research. Ultimately, realizing the vision of truly interpretable and trustworthy AI will require continued advancements in both the development of robust analysis techniques and the ability to effectively communicate those insights to diverse stakeholders. This paper makes a valuable contribution to that ongoing effort.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Explaining Text Classifiers with Counterfactual Representations
Pirmin Lemberger, Antoine Saillenfest
0
0
One well motivated explanation method for classifiers leverages counterfactuals which are hypothetical events identical to real observations in all aspects except for one categorical feature. Constructing such counterfactual poses specific challenges for texts, however, as some attribute values may not necessarily align with plausible real-world events. In this paper we propose a simple method for generating counterfactuals by intervening in the space of text representations which bypasses this limitation. We argue that our interventions are minimally disruptive and that they are theoretically sound as they align with counterfactuals as defined in Pearl's causal inference framework. To validate our method, we conducted experiments first on a synthetic dataset and then on a realistic dataset of counterfactuals. This allows for a direct comparison between classifier predictions based on ground truth counterfactuals - obtained through explicit text interventions - and our counterfactuals, derived through interventions in the representation space. Eventually, we study a real world scenario where our counterfactuals can be leveraged both for explaining a classifier and for bias mitigation.
4/30/2024
LLMs for Generating and Evaluating Counterfactuals: A Comprehensive Study
Van Bach Nguyen, Paul Youssef, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert
0
0
As NLP models become more complex, understanding their decisions becomes more crucial. Counterfactuals (CFs), where minimal changes to inputs flip a model's prediction, offer a way to explain these models. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in NLP tasks, their efficacy in generating high-quality CFs remains uncertain. This work fills this gap by investigating how well LLMs generate CFs for two NLU tasks. We conduct a comprehensive comparison of several common LLMs, and evaluate their CFs, assessing both intrinsic metrics, and the impact of these CFs on data augmentation. Moreover, we analyze differences between human and LLM-generated CFs, providing insights for future research directions. Our results show that LLMs generate fluent CFs, but struggle to keep the induced changes minimal. Generating CFs for Sentiment Analysis (SA) is less challenging than NLI where LLMs show weaknesses in generating CFs that flip the original label. This also reflects on the data augmentation performance, where we observe a large gap between augmenting with human and LLMs CFs. Furthermore, we evaluate LLMs' ability to assess CFs in a mislabelled data setting, and show that they have a strong bias towards agreeing with the provided labels. GPT4 is more robust against this bias and its scores correlate well with automatic metrics. Our findings reveal several limitations and point to potential future work directions.
5/3/2024
🏋️
Interactive Analysis of LLMs using Meaningful Counterfactuals
Furui Cheng, Vil'em Zouhar, Robin Shing Moon Chan, Daniel Furst, Hendrik Strobelt, Mennatallah El-Assady
0
0
Counterfactual examples are useful for exploring the decision boundaries of machine learning models and determining feature attributions. How can we apply counterfactual-based methods to analyze and explain LLMs? We identify the following key challenges. First, the generated textual counterfactuals should be meaningful and readable to users and thus can be mentally compared to draw conclusions. Second, to make the solution scalable to long-form text, users should be equipped with tools to create batches of counterfactuals from perturbations at various granularity levels and interactively analyze the results. In this paper, we tackle the above challenges and contribute 1) a novel algorithm for generating batches of complete and meaningful textual counterfactuals by removing and replacing text segments in different granularities, and 2) LLM Analyzer, an interactive visualization tool to help users understand an LLM's behaviors by interactively inspecting and aggregating meaningful counterfactuals. We evaluate the proposed algorithm by the grammatical correctness of its generated counterfactuals using 1,000 samples from medical, legal, finance, education, and news datasets. In our experiments, 97.2% of the counterfactuals are grammatically correct. Through a use case, user studies, and feedback from experts, we demonstrate the usefulness and usability of the proposed interactive visualization tool.
5/3/2024
🛸
Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation for Text
Amrita Bhattacharjee, Raha Moraffah, Joshua Garland, Huan Liu
0
0
Counterfactual examples are frequently used for model development and evaluation in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Although methods for automated counterfactual generation have been explored, such methods depend on models such as pre-trained language models that are then fine-tuned on auxiliary, often task-specific datasets. Collecting and annotating such datasets for counterfactual generation is labor intensive and therefore, infeasible in practice. Therefore, in this work, we focus on a novel problem setting: textit{zero-shot counterfactual generation}. To this end, we propose a structured way to utilize large language models (LLMs) as general purpose counterfactual example generators. We hypothesize that the instruction-following and textual understanding capabilities of recent LLMs can be effectively leveraged for generating high quality counterfactuals in a zero-shot manner, without requiring any training or fine-tuning. Through comprehensive experiments on various downstream tasks in natural language processing (NLP), we demonstrate the efficacy of LLMs as zero-shot counterfactual generators in evaluating and explaining black-box NLP models.
5/9/2024