10 Years of Fair Representations: Challenges and Opportunities

Read original: arXiv:2407.03834 - Published 7/8/2024 by Mattia Cerrato, Marius Koppel, Philipp Wolf, Stefan Kramer
Total Score

0

10 Years of Fair Representations: Challenges and Opportunities

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive review of the field of fair representation learning over the past 10 years.
  • It examines the key challenges and opportunities that have emerged during this period, and outlines future research directions.
  • The paper covers topics such as algorithmic fairness, bias mitigation, and the trade-offs between fairness and other objectives.

Plain English Explanation

Fair representation learning is a field of research that aims to develop machine learning models that make fair and unbiased decisions. Over the past 10 years, this area has seen significant progress, but there are still many challenges to overcome.

One of the core goals of fair representation learning is to ensure that machine learning models do not discriminate against individuals or groups based on protected characteristics such as race, gender, or age. This is important because machine learning models can often reflect and amplify the biases present in the data they are trained on.

The paper examines some of the key challenges in this field, such as defining and measuring fairness, dealing with trade-offs between fairness and other objectives (like accuracy), and ensuring that fair representations generalize well to new situations. It also highlights emerging opportunities, such as the potential for personalized fairness approaches and the use of federated learning to preserve privacy while learning fair representations.

Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the progress made in fair representation learning over the past decade, and outlines important directions for future research in this critical area.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing a historical overview of the field of fair representation learning, tracing its development over the past 10 years. It notes that the field has made significant progress in addressing issues of algorithmic bias and discrimination, but many challenges remain.

One of the key challenges discussed is the definition and measurement of fairness. The paper examines different fairness metrics, such as demographic parity, equal opportunity, and equalized odds, and discusses the trade-offs between them. It also explores the challenge of balancing fairness with other objectives, such as accuracy or utility, and how to deal with these trade-offs.

The paper also delves into the challenge of ensuring that fair representations generalize well to new situations. It discusses the importance of debiasing the data used to train machine learning models, as well as techniques for learning representations that are invariant to protected attributes.

Additionally, the paper highlights emerging opportunities in the field, such as the potential for personalized fairness approaches that take into account individual preferences and contexts. It also explores the use of federated learning, which allows for the learning of fair representations while preserving the privacy of individual data.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the field of fair representation learning, highlighting both the significant progress made over the past decade as well as the ongoing challenges.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the ethical and societal implications of fair representation learning. While the paper touches on the importance of fairness in machine learning, it could have explored the broader societal impacts of this technology in more depth.

Additionally, the paper could have acknowledged some of the critiques and concerns that have been raised about fair representation learning, such as the potential for these techniques to reify existing power structures or to be used in ways that reinforce discrimination.

Overall, the paper is a valuable contribution to the field, but there is still room for further research and critical reflection on the limitations and potential pitfalls of fair representation learning.

Conclusion

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the field of fair representation learning, highlighting the significant progress made over the past 10 years as well as the ongoing challenges and emerging opportunities.

As machine learning continues to play an increasingly important role in decision-making, the need for fair and unbiased algorithms has become increasingly urgent. The insights and recommendations presented in this paper can help guide researchers and practitioners in the development of more equitable and responsible AI systems.

Overall, the paper serves as an important milestone in the evolution of fair representation learning, and its findings will undoubtedly shape the future research and development in this critical field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

10 Years of Fair Representations: Challenges and Opportunities
Total Score

0

10 Years of Fair Representations: Challenges and Opportunities

Mattia Cerrato, Marius Koppel, Philipp Wolf, Stefan Kramer

Fair Representation Learning (FRL) is a broad set of techniques, mostly based on neural networks, that seeks to learn new representations of data in which sensitive or undesired information has been removed. Methodologically, FRL was pioneered by Richard Zemel et al. about ten years ago. The basic concepts, objectives and evaluation strategies for FRL methodologies remain unchanged to this day. In this paper, we look back at the first ten years of FRL by i) revisiting its theoretical standing in light of recent work in deep learning theory that shows the hardness of removing information in neural network representations and ii) presenting the results of a massive experimentation (225.000 model fits and 110.000 AutoML fits) we conducted with the objective of improving on the common evaluation scenario for FRL. More specifically, we use automated machine learning (AutoML) to adversarially mine sensitive information from supposedly fair representations. Our theoretical and experimental analysis suggests that deterministic, unquantized FRL methodologies have serious issues in removing sensitive information, which is especially troubling as they might seem fair at first glance.

Read more

7/8/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Back to the Drawing Board for Fair Representation Learning

Ang'eline Pouget, Nikola Jovanovi'c, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin Vechev

The goal of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) is to mitigate biases in machine learning models by learning data representations that enable high accuracy on downstream tasks while minimizing discrimination based on sensitive attributes. The evaluation of FRL methods in many recent works primarily focuses on the tradeoff between downstream fairness and accuracy with respect to a single task that was used to approximate the utility of representations during training (proxy task). This incentivizes retaining only features relevant to the proxy task while discarding all other information. In extreme cases, this can cause the learned representations to collapse to a trivial, binary value, rendering them unusable in transfer settings. In this work, we argue that this approach is fundamentally mismatched with the original motivation of FRL, which arises from settings with many downstream tasks unknown at training time (transfer tasks). To remedy this, we propose to refocus the evaluation protocol of FRL methods primarily around the performance on transfer tasks. A key challenge when conducting such an evaluation is the lack of adequate benchmarks. We address this by formulating four criteria that a suitable evaluation procedure should fulfill. Based on these, we propose TransFair, a benchmark that satisfies these criteria, consisting of novel variations of popular FRL datasets with carefully calibrated transfer tasks. In this setting, we reevaluate state-of-the-art FRL methods, observing that they often overfit to the proxy task, which causes them to underperform on certain transfer tasks. We further highlight the importance of task-agnostic learning signals for FRL methods, as they can lead to more transferrable representations.

Read more

5/29/2024

Adaptive Fair Representation Learning for Personalized Fairness in Recommendations via Information Alignment
Total Score

0

Adaptive Fair Representation Learning for Personalized Fairness in Recommendations via Information Alignment

Xinyu Zhu, Lilin Zhang, Ning Yang

Personalized fairness in recommendations has been attracting increasing attention from researchers. The existing works often treat a fairness requirement, represented as a collection of sensitive attributes, as a hyper-parameter, and pursue extreme fairness by completely removing information of sensitive attributes from the learned fair embedding, which suffer from two challenges: huge training cost incurred by the explosion of attribute combinations, and the suboptimal trade-off between fairness and accuracy. In this paper, we propose a novel Adaptive Fair Representation Learning (AFRL) model, which achieves a real personalized fairness due to its advantage of training only one model to adaptively serve different fairness requirements during inference phase. Particularly, AFRL treats fairness requirements as inputs and can learn an attribute-specific embedding for each attribute from the unfair user embedding, which endows AFRL with the adaptability during inference phase to determine the non-sensitive attributes under the guidance of the user's unique fairness requirement. To achieve a better trade-off between fairness and accuracy in recommendations, AFRL conducts a novel Information Alignment to exactly preserve discriminative information of non-sensitive attributes and incorporate a debiased collaborative embedding into the fair embedding to capture attribute-independent collaborative signals, without loss of fairness. Finally, the extensive experiments conducted on real datasets together with the sound theoretical analysis demonstrate the superiority of AFRL.

Read more

4/16/2024

Federated Representation Learning in the Under-Parameterized Regime
Total Score

0

Federated Representation Learning in the Under-Parameterized Regime

Renpu Liu, Cong Shen, Jing Yang

Federated representation learning (FRL) is a popular personalized federated learning (FL) framework where clients work together to train a common representation while retaining their personalized heads. Existing studies, however, largely focus on the over-parameterized regime. In this paper, we make the initial efforts to investigate FRL in the under-parameterized regime, where the FL model is insufficient to express the variations in all ground-truth models. We propose a novel FRL algorithm FLUTE, and theoretically characterize its sample complexity and convergence rate for linear models in the under-parameterized regime. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first FRL algorithm with provable performance guarantees in this regime. FLUTE features a data-independent random initialization and a carefully designed objective function that aids the distillation of subspace spanned by the global optimal representation from the misaligned local representations. On the technical side, we bridge low-rank matrix approximation techniques with the FL analysis, which may be of broad interest. We also extend FLUTE beyond linear representations. Experimental results demonstrate that FLUTE outperforms state-of-the-art FRL solutions in both synthetic and real-world tasks.

Read more

7/19/2024