Back to the Drawing Board for Fair Representation Learning

Overview

• The paper focuses on the evaluation of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) methods, which aim to mitigate biases in machine learning models.
• Many recent works on FRL have primarily evaluated the tradeoff between fairness and accuracy on a single task used during training (proxy task).
• The authors argue this approach is mismatched with the original motivation of FRL, which is for settings with many unknown downstream tasks (transfer tasks).
• To address this, the authors propose a new benchmark, TransFair, to evaluate FRL methods on their ability to learn transferable representations.

Plain English Explanation

The goal of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) is to create machine learning models that are accurate but also fair, meaning they don't discriminate based on sensitive attributes like race or gender. Recent studies on FRL have mostly focused on measuring how well these models balance accuracy and fairness on a single task they were trained on (the "proxy task").

However, the authors argue this approach misses the point of FRL, which is really about building models that can work well on many unknown future tasks (the "transfer tasks"). Imagine you're building a resume screening tool - you want it to be accurate and fair, but you also want it to work well for all the different jobs your company might hire for in the future, not just the one you tested it on.

To fix this, the authors created a new benchmark called TransFair, which tests how well FRL models can learn representations (or "encodings") of the data that work well across many different transfer tasks, not just the proxy task. They found that current FRL methods often overfit to the proxy task, leading to poorer performance on the transfer tasks.

The key insight is that FRL methods need to focus more on learning general, "task-agnostic" representations, rather than ones tailored to a specific task. This will make the representations more transferable to new settings and applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper argues that the evaluation of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) methods in recent works has primarily focused on the tradeoff between downstream fairness and accuracy with respect to a single task used to approximate the utility of representations during training (the proxy task). This incentivizes retaining only features relevant to the proxy task while discarding all other information. In extreme cases, this can cause the learned representations to collapse to a trivial, binary value, rendering them unusable in transfer settings.

To address this, the authors propose to refocus the evaluation protocol of FRL methods primarily around their performance on transfer tasks. A key challenge is the lack of adequate benchmarks, so the authors formulate four criteria that a suitable evaluation procedure should fulfill. Based on this, they propose TransFair, a benchmark consisting of novel variations of popular FRL datasets with carefully calibrated transfer tasks.

In this setting, the authors reevaluate state-of-the-art FRL methods and observe that they often overfit to the proxy task, leading to underperformance on certain transfer tasks. The authors further highlight the importance of task-agnostic learning signals for FRL methods, as they can lead to more transferrable representations.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises valid concerns about the current evaluation approach for FRL methods, which the authors demonstrate can lead to overfitting and poor performance on transfer tasks. The proposed TransFair benchmark provides a more comprehensive way to assess the generalizability of FRL representations.

One potential limitation is the reliance on human-curated transfer tasks, which could introduce biases. An interesting area for future research would be to explore automated or data-driven methods for generating transfer tasks to further reduce bias.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms by which current FRL methods fail to learn transferable representations. More analysis of the learned representations and the training dynamics could provide additional insights.

Finally, the authors acknowledge that their proposed approach does not address the fundamental challenge of defining appropriate notions of fairness. Transferring fairness across tasks using multi-task learning could be an interesting direction to explore in future work.

Conclusion

This paper highlights an important shortcoming in the current evaluation of Fair Representation Learning (FRL) methods and proposes a new benchmark, TransFair, to address it. The key insight is that FRL methods need to focus on learning general, task-agnostic representations rather than ones tailored to a specific proxy task. This will enable the representations to transfer more effectively to unknown downstream applications, better fulfilling the original motivation of FRL. The TransFair benchmark provides a more comprehensive way to assess this capability, revealing limitations in existing FRL methods that can inform future research in this area.