100 Drivers, 2200 km: A Natural Dataset of Driving Style toward Human-centered Intelligent Driving Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a large-scale natural driving dataset collected from 100 drivers over 2,200 km of driving.
- The dataset aims to support the development of human-centered intelligent driving systems by providing insights into real-world driving behaviors and styles.
- The dataset includes rich sensor data, including vehicle dynamics, driver inputs, and environmental information, as well as video recordings of the driver and the driving environment.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper describes a new dataset that captures the driving behaviors of 100 different people over a long distance of 2,200 km. The goal is to help create more intelligent driving systems that can better understand and respond to how humans actually drive in the real world.
The dataset includes a wide range of sensor data, like information about how the vehicle is moving and what the driver is doing, as well as video recordings of the driver and the driving environment. This data can give researchers and engineers valuable insights into the different styles and patterns of human driving behavior.
By having access to this rich, naturalistic dataset, they can develop AI systems for self-driving cars or driver assistance features that are better tailored to how people really drive, rather than relying on idealized or simplified models of driving. This can lead to more human-centered, intuitive, and effective intelligent driving systems in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel dataset, called 100 Drivers, 2200 km, that captures the natural driving behaviors of 100 individuals over a 2,200 km route. This dataset was designed to support the development of human-centered intelligent driving systems by providing rich, real-world data on driver behaviors and interactions with the vehicle and environment.
The dataset includes a wide range of sensor data, including vehicle dynamics (e.g., speed, acceleration, steering angle), driver inputs (e.g., pedal positions, turn signals), and environmental information (e.g., GPS, road curvature, traffic density). Additionally, the dataset includes synchronized video recordings of the driver and the driving scene. This multimodal data can enable researchers to develop data-driven models of driver behavior and systematic approaches to dataset development for intelligent driving systems.
Critical Analysis
The 100 Drivers, 2200 km dataset represents a significant contribution to the field of intelligent driving systems by providing a large-scale, naturalistic dataset of human driving behaviors. The authors have taken great care to ensure the dataset's quality and diversity, including participants from a range of age groups, driving experiences, and vehicle types.
However, the paper does acknowledge several limitations of the dataset, such as the lack of diversity in driving environments (the dataset was collected primarily on highways) and the potential for biases in the participant selection process. Additionally, the dataset does not include information on driver cognitive state or physiological measures, which could provide valuable insights into the underlying factors influencing driving behaviors.
Future research could explore ways to expand the dataset's scope, such as incorporating data from different driving scenarios or collecting additional physiological and contextual data. Researchers should also be mindful of the ethical considerations surrounding the use of such naturalistic driving data, particularly in the development of autonomous driving systems.
Conclusion
The 100 Drivers, 2200 km dataset represents a significant contribution to the field of intelligent driving systems. By providing a large-scale, naturalistic dataset of human driving behaviors, the researchers have laid the groundwork for the development of more human-centered and effective autonomous driving technologies. The dataset's rich, multimodal data can enable researchers to gain deeper insights into real-world driving patterns and behaviors, ultimately leading to the creation of intelligent driving systems that are better tailored to the needs and capabilities of human drivers.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
100 Drivers, 2200 km: A Natural Dataset of Driving Style toward Human-centered Intelligent Driving Systems
Chaopeng Zhang, Wenshuo Wang, Zhaokun Chen, Junqiang Xi
Effective driving style analysis is critical to developing human-centered intelligent driving systems that consider drivers' preferences. However, the approaches and conclusions of most related studies are diverse and inconsistent because no unified datasets tagged with driving styles exist as a reliable benchmark. The absence of explicit driving style labels makes verifying different approaches and algorithms difficult. This paper provides a new benchmark by constructing a natural dataset of Driving Style (100-DrivingStyle) tagged with the subjective evaluation of 100 drivers' driving styles. In this dataset, the subjective quantification of each driver's driving style is from themselves and an expert according to the Likert-scale questionnaire. The testing routes are selected to cover various driving scenarios, including highways, urban, highway ramps, and signalized traffic. The collected driving data consists of lateral and longitudinal manipulation information, including steering angle, steering speed, lateral acceleration, throttle position, throttle rate, brake pressure, etc. This dataset is the first to provide detailed manipulation data with driving-style tags, and we demonstrate its benchmark function using six classifiers. The 100-DrivingStyle dataset is available via https://github.com/chaopengzhang/100-DrivingStyle-Dataset
Read more6/13/2024
0
Exploring the Influence of Driving Context on Lateral Driving Style Preferences: A Simulator-Based Study
Johann Haselberger, Maximilian Bohle, Bernhard Schick, Steffen Muller
Technological advancements focus on developing comfortable and acceptable driving characteristics in autonomous vehicles. Present driving functions predominantly possess predefined parameters, and there is no universally accepted driving style for autonomous vehicles. While driving may be technically safe and the likelihood of road accidents is reduced, passengers may still feel insecure due to a mismatch in driving styles between the human and the autonomous system. Incorporating driving style preferences into automated vehicles enhances acceptance, reduces uncertainty, and poses the opportunity to expedite their adoption. Despite the increased research focus on driving styles, there remains a need for comprehensive studies investigating how variations in the driving context impact the assessment of automated driving functions. Therefore, this work evaluates lateral driving style preferences for autonomous vehicles on rural roads, considering different weather and traffic situations. A controlled study was conducted with a variety of German participants utilizing a high-fidelity driving simulator. The subjects experienced four different driving styles, including mimicking of their own driving behavior under two weather conditions. A notable preference for a more passive driving style became evident based on statistical analyses of participants' responses during and after the drives. This study could not confirm the hypothesis that subjects prefer to be driven by mimicking their own driving behavior. Furthermore, the study illustrated that weather conditions and oncoming traffic substantially influence the perceived comfort during autonomous rides. The gathered dataset is openly accessible at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jhaselberger/idcld-subject-study-on-driving-style-preferences.
Read more4/11/2024
0
A Survey on Autonomous Driving Datasets: Statistics, Annotation Quality, and a Future Outlook
Mingyu Liu, Ekim Yurtsever, Jonathan Fossaert, Xingcheng Zhou, Walter Zimmer, Yuning Cui, Bare Luka Zagar, Alois C. Knoll
Autonomous driving has rapidly developed and shown promising performance due to recent advances in hardware and deep learning techniques. High-quality datasets are fundamental for developing reliable autonomous driving algorithms. Previous dataset surveys either focused on a limited number or lacked detailed investigation of dataset characteristics. To this end, we present an exhaustive study of 265 autonomous driving datasets from multiple perspectives, including sensor modalities, data size, tasks, and contextual conditions. We introduce a novel metric to evaluate the impact of datasets, which can also be a guide for creating new datasets. Besides, we analyze the annotation processes, existing labeling tools, and the annotation quality of datasets, showing the importance of establishing a standard annotation pipeline. On the other hand, we thoroughly analyze the impact of geographical and adversarial environmental conditions on the performance of autonomous driving systems. Moreover, we exhibit the data distribution of several vital datasets and discuss their pros and cons accordingly. Finally, we discuss the current challenges and the development trend of the future autonomous driving datasets.
Read more4/24/2024
💬
0
D2E-An Autonomous Decision-making Dataset involving Driver States and Human Evaluation
Zehong Ke, Yanbo Jiang, Yuning Wang, Hao Cheng, Jinhao Li, Jianqiang Wang
With the advancement of deep learning technology, data-driven methods are increasingly used in the decision-making of autonomous driving, and the quality of datasets greatly influenced the model performance. Although current datasets have made significant progress in the collection of vehicle and environment data, emphasis on human-end data including the driver states and human evaluation is not sufficient. In addition, existing datasets consist mostly of simple scenarios such as car following, resulting in low interaction levels. In this paper, we introduce the Driver to Evaluation dataset (D2E), an autonomous decision-making dataset that contains data on driver states, vehicle states, environmental situations, and evaluation scores from human reviewers, covering a comprehensive process of vehicle decision-making. Apart from regular agents and surrounding environment information, we not only collect driver factor data including first-person view videos, physiological signals, and eye attention data, but also provide subjective rating scores from 40 human volunteers. The dataset is mixed of driving simulator scenes and real-road ones. High-interaction situations are designed and filtered to ensure behavior diversity. Through data organization, analysis, and preprocessing, D2E contains over 1100 segments of interactive driving case data covering from human driver factor to evaluation results, supporting the development of data-driven decision-making related algorithms.
Read more6/5/2024