Accelerating Hybrid Federated Learning Convergence under Partial Participation
2304.05397
0
0
🏅
Abstract
Over the past few years, Federated Learning (FL) has become a popular distributed machine learning paradigm. FL involves a group of clients with decentralized data who collaborate to learn a common model under the coordination of a centralized server, with the goal of protecting clients' privacy by ensuring that local datasets never leave the clients and that the server only performs model aggregation. However, in realistic scenarios, the server may be able to collect a small amount of data that approximately mimics the population distribution and has stronger computational ability to perform the learning process. To address this, we focus on the hybrid FL framework in this paper. While previous hybrid FL work has shown that the alternative training of clients and server can increase convergence speed, it has focused on the scenario where clients fully participate and ignores the negative effect of partial participation. In this paper, we provide theoretical analysis of hybrid FL under clients' partial participation to validate that partial participation is the key constraint on convergence speed. We then propose a new algorithm called FedCLG, which investigates the two-fold role of the server in hybrid FL. Firstly, the server needs to process the training steps using its small amount of local datasets. Secondly, the server's calculated gradient needs to guide the participated clients' training and the server's aggregation. We validate our theoretical findings through numerical experiments, which show that our proposed method FedCLG outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning approach where a group of clients with decentralized data collaborate to learn a common model under the coordination of a centralized server.
- The goal of FL is to protect clients' privacy by ensuring that local datasets never leave the clients and the server only performs model aggregation.
- However, in realistic scenarios, the server may have a small amount of data that approximates the population distribution and stronger computational ability to perform the learning process.
- This paper focuses on the hybrid FL framework, which involves both client-side and server-side training.
Plain English Explanation
Federated Learning (FL) is a way for different devices or computers to work together to train a machine learning model, without each device having to share their private data. Imagine a group of people who each have a set of personal information, like their shopping habits or health data, and they want to use that information to train a model that can help them all. With traditional machine learning, they would need to send all their data to a central server, which could raise privacy concerns.
In FL, the devices or computers (called "clients") keep their data private and instead send only updates to the model they're training. A central server coordinates the training process and combines the updates from all the clients to create a shared model. This allows the clients to benefit from the collective knowledge without compromising their privacy.
However, in real-world scenarios, the central server may have access to a small amount of data that is similar to the clients' data, and the server may also have more computational power than the clients. This paper looks at this "hybrid" FL setting, where both the clients and the server are involved in the training process. The researchers analyze how the partial participation of clients (i.e., some clients not participating) can affect the speed at which the model converges, or becomes accurate. They then propose a new algorithm called FedCLG that aims to address this issue by having the server guide the training of the participating clients.
Technical Explanation
Previous work on hybrid FL has shown that the alternating training of clients and the server can increase the convergence speed of the model. However, this prior research has focused on the scenario where all clients fully participate in the training, and has not considered the negative impact of partial client participation.
In this paper, the researchers provide a theoretical analysis of hybrid FL under partial client participation. They find that partial participation is a key constraint on the convergence speed of the model.
To address this, the researchers propose a new algorithm called FedCLG, which investigates the two-fold role of the server in hybrid FL:
- The server needs to process training steps using its own small amount of local data.
- The server's calculated gradient needs to guide the training of the participated clients, as well as the server's own model aggregation.
Through numerical experiments, the researchers show that their proposed FedCLG method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, such as FedAgg, AFL, and LAFL.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis and a novel algorithm to address the challenge of partial client participation in hybrid Federated Learning. The researchers have identified an important practical limitation of previous hybrid FL approaches and have proposed a solution that leverages the server's computational capabilities and local data to guide the training of the participating clients.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential privacy implications of the server having access to a small amount of local data, even if it is meant to approximate the population distribution. There may be concerns around the server potentially using this data to infer sensitive information about the clients.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the convergence speed of the model, but does not provide much insight into the final model performance or generalization capabilities. It would be interesting to see how the proposed FedCLG method compares to other approaches in terms of the quality of the final trained model.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important contribution to the field of Federated Learning, but future work should also consider the privacy and performance implications of the proposed hybrid approach.
Conclusion
This paper addresses a key limitation of previous hybrid Federated Learning approaches by providing a theoretical analysis and a new algorithm, FedCLG, that can improve the convergence speed of the model under partial client participation. The researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach through numerical experiments, and their work highlights the importance of considering the server's role and computational capabilities in the design of efficient Federated Learning systems.
As Federated Learning continues to gain traction as a privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm, this research provides valuable insights and a practical solution that can help advance the state of the art in this field. However, future work should also examine the broader implications of hybrid FL approaches, particularly around data privacy and model performance, to ensure that these techniques can be deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Harnessing Increased Client Participation with Cohort-Parallel Federated Learning
Akash Dhasade, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, Tuan-Anh Nguyen, Rafael Pires, Martijn de Vos
0
0
Federated Learning (FL) is a machine learning approach where nodes collaboratively train a global model. As more nodes participate in a round of FL, the effectiveness of individual model updates by nodes also diminishes. In this study, we increase the effectiveness of client updates by dividing the network into smaller partitions, or cohorts. We introduce Cohort-Parallel Federated Learning (CPFL): a novel learning approach where each cohort independently trains a global model using FL, until convergence, and the produced models by each cohort are then unified using one-shot Knowledge Distillation (KD) and a cross-domain, unlabeled dataset. The insight behind CPFL is that smaller, isolated networks converge quicker than in a one-network setting where all nodes participate. Through exhaustive experiments involving realistic traces and non-IID data distributions on the CIFAR-10 and FEMNIST image classification tasks, we investigate the balance between the number of cohorts, model accuracy, training time, and compute and communication resources. Compared to traditional FL, CPFL with four cohorts, non-IID data distribution, and CIFAR-10 yields a 1.9$times$ reduction in train time and a 1.3$times$ reduction in resource usage, with a minimal drop in test accuracy.
5/27/2024
Embracing Federated Learning: Enabling Weak Client Participation via Partial Model Training
Sunwoo Lee, Tuo Zhang, Saurav Prakash, Yue Niu, Salman Avestimehr
0
0
In Federated Learning (FL), clients may have weak devices that cannot train the full model or even hold it in their memory space. To implement large-scale FL applications, thus, it is crucial to develop a distributed learning method that enables the participation of such weak clients. We propose EmbracingFL, a general FL framework that allows all available clients to join the distributed training regardless of their system resource capacity. The framework is built upon a novel form of partial model training method in which each client trains as many consecutive output-side layers as its system resources allow. Our study demonstrates that EmbracingFL encourages each layer to have similar data representations across clients, improving FL efficiency. The proposed partial model training method guarantees convergence to a neighbor of stationary points for non-convex and smooth problems. We evaluate the efficacy of EmbracingFL under a variety of settings with a mixed number of strong, moderate (~40% memory), and weak (~15% memory) clients, datasets (CIFAR-10, FEMNIST, and IMDB), and models (ResNet20, CNN, and LSTM). Our empirical study shows that EmbracingFL consistently achieves high accuracy as like all clients are strong, outperforming the state-of-the-art width reduction methods (i.e. HeteroFL and FjORD).
6/24/2024
Asynchronous Multi-Server Federated Learning for Geo-Distributed Clients
Yuncong Zuo, Bart Cox, Lydia Y. Chen, J'er'emie Decouchant
0
0
Federated learning (FL) systems enable multiple clients to train a machine learning model iteratively through synchronously exchanging the intermediate model weights with a single server. The scalability of such FL systems can be limited by two factors: server idle time due to synchronous communication and the risk of a single server becoming the bottleneck. In this paper, we propose a new FL architecture, to our knowledge, the first multi-server FL system that is entirely asynchronous, and therefore addresses these two limitations simultaneously. Our solution keeps both servers and clients continuously active. As in previous multi-server methods, clients interact solely with their nearest server, ensuring efficient update integration into the model. Differently, however, servers also periodically update each other asynchronously, and never postpone interactions with clients. We compare our solution to three representative baselines - FedAvg, FedAsync and HierFAVG - on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 image classification datasets and on the WikiText-2 language modeling dataset. Our solution converges to similar or higher accuracy levels than previous baselines and requires 61% less time to do so in geo-distributed settings.
6/21/2024
📶
Convergence Analysis of Sequential Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Data
Yipeng Li, Xinchen Lyu
0
0
There are two categories of methods in Federated Learning (FL) for joint training across multiple clients: i) parallel FL (PFL), where clients train models in a parallel manner; and ii) sequential FL (SFL), where clients train models in a sequential manner. In contrast to that of PFL, the convergence theory of SFL on heterogeneous data is still lacking. In this paper, we establish the convergence guarantees of SFL for strongly/general/non-convex objectives on heterogeneous data. The convergence guarantees of SFL are better than that of PFL on heterogeneous data with both full and partial client participation. Experimental results validate the counterintuitive analysis result that SFL outperforms PFL on extremely heterogeneous data in cross-device settings.
5/9/2024