Active Learning with Weak Supervision for Gaussian Processes

Read original: arXiv:2204.08335 - Published 8/19/2024 by Amanda Olmin, Jakob Lindqvist, Lennart Svensson, Fredrik Lindsten

🏋️

Overview

Annotating data for supervised learning can be costly.
When the annotation budget is limited, active learning can be used to select and annotate the most valuable observations.
This paper proposes an active learning algorithm that selects both the observation to annotate and the precision level of the annotation.
Annotations with lower precision are cheaper to obtain, allowing the model to explore a larger part of the input space within the same budget.
The acquisition function is based on the previously proposed BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) objective for Gaussian Processes.
The paper demonstrates the benefits of adjusting the annotation precision in the active learning loop.

Plain English Explanation

Active learning is a technique used when creating machine learning models with limited data. The idea is to focus the annotation effort on the most valuable data points, rather than annotating everything indiscriminately.

In this paper, the researchers propose an advanced active learning algorithm that not only selects which data points to annotate, but also determines the level of precision needed for those annotations. The key insight is that low-precision annotations (which are cheaper to obtain) can still provide useful information to the model, allowing it to explore more of the input space within the same annotation budget.

The researchers build their acquisition function on a previous technique called BALD, which is designed for Gaussian Process models. They show that by adjusting the annotation precision, the model can achieve better performance compared to standard active learning approaches.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces an active learning algorithm that selects both the observation to annotate and the precision level of the annotation. This is motivated by the fact that annotations with lower precision are generally cheaper to obtain, allowing the model to explore a larger part of the input space within the same annotation budget.

The authors build their acquisition function on the previously proposed BALD (Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement) objective for Gaussian Processes. BALD aims to select the observation that, when annotated, would lead to the greatest reduction in model uncertainty.

The key innovation in this paper is the ability to also select the precision level of the annotation. The authors show that by allowing the model to choose lower-precision annotations in some cases, it can still gain useful information while exploring more of the input space compared to standard active learning approaches that only consider full-precision annotations.

The paper presents empirical results demonstrating the benefits of this approach, with the model achieving better performance than baselines that do not adjust the annotation precision.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel active learning algorithm that takes into account the cost of annotations by allowing the model to select different precision levels. This is a valuable contribution, as annotation costs are a significant challenge in many real-world machine learning applications.

One potential limitation is the reliance on Gaussian Processes as the underlying model. While Gaussian Processes are a powerful and well-studied class of models, they may not be the best fit for all types of problems. It would be interesting to see how the proposed approach could be extended to other model families, such as neural networks.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the tradeoffs between annotation precision and model performance. It would be helpful to better understand the relationship between these factors and how they vary across different types of problems or datasets.

Overall, this paper provides a promising direction for making active learning more practical and efficient, and encourages readers to think critically about the role of annotation costs in machine learning.

Conclusion

This paper presents an active learning algorithm that selects both the observation to annotate and the precision level of the annotation. By allowing the model to choose lower-precision annotations when appropriate, it can explore a larger part of the input space within the same annotation budget.

The proposed approach builds on the BALD active learning objective for Gaussian Processes, demonstrating empirical gains over standard active learning baselines. This work highlights the importance of considering annotation costs in machine learning and offers a novel technique to address this challenge.

As machine learning becomes more widely deployed in real-world applications, techniques like this that optimize the use of limited annotation resources will become increasingly valuable. This paper serves as an inspiring example of how to make active learning more practical and efficient.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Active Learning with Weak Supervision for Gaussian Processes

Amanda Olmin, Jakob Lindqvist, Lennart Svensson, Fredrik Lindsten

Annotating data for supervised learning can be costly. When the annotation budget is limited, active learning can be used to select and annotate those observations that are likely to give the most gain in model performance. We propose an active learning algorithm that, in addition to selecting which observation to annotate, selects the precision of the annotation that is acquired. Assuming that annotations with low precision are cheaper to obtain, this allows the model to explore a larger part of the input space, with the same annotation budget. We build our acquisition function on the previously proposed BALD objective for Gaussian Processes, and empirically demonstrate the gains of being able to adjust the annotation precision in the active learning loop.

8/19/2024

Active learning for efficient annotation in precision agriculture: a use-case on crop-weed semantic segmentation

Bart M. van Marrewijk, Charbel Dandjinou, Dan Jeric Arcega Rustia, Nicolas Franco Gonzalez, Boubacar Diallo, J'er^ome Dias, Paul Melki, Pieter M. Blok

Optimizing deep learning models requires large amounts of annotated images, a process that is both time-intensive and costly. Especially for semantic segmentation models in which every pixel must be annotated. A potential strategy to mitigate annotation effort is active learning. Active learning facilitates the identification and selection of the most informative images from a large unlabelled pool. The underlying premise is that these selected images can improve the model's performance faster than random selection to reduce annotation effort. While active learning has demonstrated promising results on benchmark datasets like Cityscapes, its performance in the agricultural domain remains largely unexplored. This study addresses this research gap by conducting a comparative study of three active learning-based acquisition functions: Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement (BALD), stochastic-based BALD (PowerBALD), and Random. The acquisition functions were tested on two agricultural datasets: Sugarbeet and Corn-Weed, both containing three semantic classes: background, crop and weed. Our results indicated that active learning, especially PowerBALD, yields a higher performance than Random sampling on both datasets. But due to the relatively large standard deviations, the differences observed were minimal; this was partly caused by high image redundancy and imbalanced classes. Specifically, more than 89% of the pixels belonged to the background class on both datasets. The absence of significant results on both datasets indicates that further research is required for applying active learning on agricultural datasets, especially if they contain a high-class imbalance and redundant images. Recommendations and insights are provided in this paper to potentially resolve such issues.

4/4/2024

Active Learning for Derivative-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis with Gaussian Processes

Syrine Belakaria, Benjamin Letham, Janardhan Rao Doppa, Barbara Engelhardt, Stefano Ermon, Eytan Bakshy

We consider the problem of active learning for global sensitivity analysis of expensive black-box functions. Our aim is to efficiently learn the importance of different input variables, e.g., in vehicle safety experimentation, we study the impact of the thickness of various components on safety objectives. Since function evaluations are expensive, we use active learning to prioritize experimental resources where they yield the most value. We propose novel active learning acquisition functions that directly target key quantities of derivative-based global sensitivity measures (DGSMs) under Gaussian process surrogate models. We showcase the first application of active learning directly to DGSMs, and develop tractable uncertainty reduction and information gain acquisition functions for these measures. Through comprehensive evaluation on synthetic and real-world problems, our study demonstrates how these active learning acquisition strategies substantially enhance the sample efficiency of DGSM estimation, particularly with limited evaluation budgets. Our work paves the way for more efficient and accurate sensitivity analysis in various scientific and engineering applications.

7/16/2024

Amortized Active Learning for Nonparametric Functions

Cen-You Li, Marc Toussaint, Barbara Rakitsch, Christoph Zimmer

Active learning (AL) is a sequential learning scheme aiming to select the most informative data. AL reduces data consumption and avoids the cost of labeling large amounts of data. However, AL trains the model and solves an acquisition optimization for each selection. It becomes expensive when the model training or acquisition optimization is challenging. In this paper, we focus on active nonparametric function learning, where the gold standard Gaussian process (GP) approaches suffer from cubic time complexity. We propose an amortized AL method, where new data are suggested by a neural network which is trained up-front without any real data (Figure 1). Our method avoids repeated model training and requires no acquisition optimization during the AL deployment. We (i) utilize GPs as function priors to construct an AL simulator, (ii) train an AL policy that can zero-shot generalize from simulation to real learning problems of nonparametric functions and (iii) achieve real-time data selection and comparable learning performances to time-consuming baseline methods.

9/12/2024