Active Sensing of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression with Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2408.02349 - Published 8/23/2024 by Khanh Nguyen, Huy Hoang Nguyen, Egor Panfilov, Aleksei Tiulpin
Total Score

0

Active Sensing of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression with Reinforcement Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Proposes a reinforcement learning approach for actively sensing the progression of knee osteoarthritis
  • Aims to optimize the timing and frequency of imaging tests to monitor disease progression
  • Potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes by tailoring monitoring strategies

Plain English Explanation

The research paper introduces a reinforcement learning approach to actively monitor the progression of knee osteoarthritis. Knee osteoarthritis is a common joint disease that can worsen over time, and regular medical imaging tests are used to track its progression.

The researchers' goal is to develop a system that can optimize the timing and frequency of these imaging tests. By using reinforcement learning, the system can learn the best schedule for each individual patient based on their unique disease progression patterns. This could help reduce healthcare costs by avoiding unnecessary tests, while also improving patient outcomes by ensuring the right tests are performed at the optimal times.

The key idea is that the reinforcement learning algorithm can "learn" the most informative times to take images of the knee joint and track changes. Over time, the system gets better at predicting when the next test should be scheduled based on the previous test results and the patient's disease history. This allows for a more personalized and efficient monitoring approach compared to a one-size-fits-all schedule.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a Markov decision process (MDP) formulation to model the active sensing problem for knee osteoarthritis progression. The state of the MDP represents the current disease severity, and the actions correspond to the decision to perform an imaging test or not.

The reinforcement learning agent aims to learn an optimal policy that determines the best times to conduct imaging tests in order to accurately track disease progression. The reward function encourages the agent to minimize the number of tests while maximizing the information gained about the disease state.

The authors evaluate their approach using simulated disease progression data, as well as real-world clinical data from a longitudinal knee osteoarthritis study. The results demonstrate that the reinforcement learning system can outperform standard fixed-interval monitoring strategies in terms of test efficiency and accuracy in estimating disease progression.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a promising framework for optimizing the monitoring of knee osteoarthritis progression using reinforcement learning. However, there are a few limitations and areas for further research:

  • The approach relies on accurate disease progression modeling, which may be challenging given the complex and heterogeneous nature of knee osteoarthritis.
  • The evaluation is based on simulated data and a single real-world dataset, so further validation on larger, more diverse patient populations is needed.
  • The paper does not address potential ethical concerns around automated decision-making for healthcare interventions, which would need to be carefully considered.

Additionally, while the authors mention the potential cost savings and improved patient outcomes, more work is needed to quantify these benefits and understand the real-world implications of deploying such a system in clinical practice.

Conclusion

This research proposes an innovative reinforcement learning approach to actively sense the progression of knee osteoarthritis. By optimizing the timing and frequency of imaging tests, the system has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes through more personalized and efficient monitoring strategies.

The technical details of the Markov decision process formulation and reinforcement learning implementation provide a solid foundation for further exploration and refinement of this approach. However, additional validation, ethical considerations, and real-world impact assessments will be important next steps to fully realize the benefits of this technology in clinical practice.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Active Sensing of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression with Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Active Sensing of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression with Reinforcement Learning

Khanh Nguyen, Huy Hoang Nguyen, Egor Panfilov, Aleksei Tiulpin

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal disease, which has no cure. Knee OA (KOA) is one of the highest causes of disability worldwide, and it costs billions of United States dollars to the global community. Prediction of KOA progression has been of high interest to the community for years, as it can advance treatment development through more efficient clinical trials and improve patient outcomes through more efficient healthcare utilization. Existing approaches for predicting KOA, however, are predominantly static, i.e. consider data from a single time point to predict progression many years into the future, and knee level, i.e. consider progression in a single joint only. Due to these and related reasons, these methods fail to deliver the level of predictive performance, which is sufficient to result in cost savings and better patient outcomes. Collecting extensive data from all patients on a regular basis could address the issue, but it is limited by the high cost at a population level. In this work, we propose to go beyond static prediction models in OA, and bring a novel Active Sensing (AS) approach, designed to dynamically follow up patients with the objective of maximizing the number of informative data acquisitions, while minimizing their total cost over a period of time. Our approach is based on Reinforcement Learning (RL), and it leverages a novel reward function designed specifically for AS of disease progression in more than one part of a human body. Our method is end-to-end, relies on multi-modal Deep Learning, and requires no human input at inference time. Throughout an exhaustive experimental evaluation, we show that using RL can provide a higher monetary benefit when compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Read more

8/23/2024

Rethinking Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading: A Few Shot Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Approach
Total Score

0

Rethinking Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading: A Few Shot Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Approach

Niamh Belton, Misgina Tsighe Hagos, Aonghus Lawlor, Kathleen M. Curran

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease affecting over 250 million people worldwide. Currently, radiologists grade the severity of OA on an ordinal scale from zero to four using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) system. Recent studies have raised concern in relation to the subjectivity of the KL grading system, highlighting the requirement for an automated system, while also indicating that five ordinal classes may not be the most appropriate approach for assessing OA severity. This work presents preliminary results of an automated system with a continuous grading scale. This system, namely SS-FewSOME, uses self-supervised pre-training to learn robust representations of the features of healthy knee X-rays. It then assesses the OA severity by the X-rays' distance to the normal representation space. SS-FewSOME initially trains on only 'few' examples of healthy knee X-rays, thus reducing the barriers to clinical implementation by eliminating the need for large training sets and costly expert annotations that existing automated systems require. The work reports promising initial results, obtaining a positive Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of 0.43, having had access to only 30 ground truth labels at training time.

Read more

7/16/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Modified Risk Formulation for Improving the Prediction of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression

Haresh Rengaraj Rajamohan, Richard Kijowski, Kyunghyun Cho, Cem M. Deniz

Current methods for predicting osteoarthritis (OA) outcomes do not incorporate disease specific prior knowledge to improve the outcome prediction models. We developed a novel approach that effectively uses consecutive imaging studies to improve OA outcome predictions by incorporating an OA severity constraint. This constraint ensures that the risk of OA for a knee should either increase or remain the same over time. DL models were trained to predict TKR within multiple time periods (1 year, 2 years, and 4 years) using knee radiographs and MRI scans. Models with and without the risk constraint were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) analysis. The novel RiskFORM2 method, leveraging a dual model risk constraint architecture, demonstrated superior performance, yielding an AUROC of 0.87 and AUPRC of 0.47 for 1 year TKR prediction on the OAI radiograph test set, a marked improvement over the 0.79 AUROC and 0.34 AUPRC of the baseline approach. The performance advantage extended to longer followup periods, with RiskFORM2 maintaining a high AUROC of 0.86 and AUPRC of 0.75 in predicting TKR within 4 years. Additionally, when generalizing to the external MOST radiograph test set, RiskFORM2 generalized better with an AUROC of 0.77 and AUPRC of 0.25 for 1 year predictions, which was higher than the 0.71 AUROC and 0.19 AUPRC of the baseline approach. In the MRI test sets, similar patterns emerged, with RiskFORM2 outperforming the baseline approach consistently. However, RiskFORM1 exhibited the highest AUROC of 0.86 and AUPRC of 0.72 for 4 year predictions on the OAI set.

Read more

6/17/2024

An AI System for Continuous Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading Using Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection with Limited Data
Total Score

0

An AI System for Continuous Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading Using Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection with Limited Data

Niamh Belton, Aonghus Lawlor, Kathleen M. Curran

The diagnostic accuracy and subjectivity of existing Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) ordinal grading systems has been a subject of on-going debate and concern. Existing automated solutions are trained to emulate these imperfect systems, whilst also being reliant on large annotated databases for fully-supervised training. This work proposes a three stage approach for automated continuous grading of knee OA that is built upon the principles of Anomaly Detection (AD); learning a robust representation of healthy knee X-rays and grading disease severity based on its distance to the centre of normality. In the first stage, SS-FewSOME is proposed, a self-supervised AD technique that learns the 'normal' representation, requiring only examples of healthy subjects and <3% of the labels that existing methods require. In the second stage, this model is used to pseudo label a subset of unlabelled data as 'normal' or 'anomalous', followed by denoising of pseudo labels with CLIP. The final stage involves retraining on labelled and pseudo labelled data using the proposed Dual Centre Representation Learning (DCRL) which learns the centres of two representation spaces; normal and anomalous. Disease severity is then graded based on the distance to the learned centres. The proposed methodology outperforms existing techniques by margins of up to 24% in terms of OA detection and the disease severity scores correlate with the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system at the same level as human expert performance. Code available at https://github.com/niamhbelton/SS-FewSOME_Disease_Severity_Knee_Osteoarthritis.

Read more

7/17/2024