Rethinking Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading: A Few Shot Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Approach

Read original: arXiv:2407.09515 - Published 7/16/2024 by Niamh Belton, Misgina Tsighe Hagos, Aonghus Lawlor, Kathleen M. Curran
Total Score

0

Rethinking Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading: A Few Shot Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Approach

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new approach to grading the severity of knee osteoarthritis using a few-shot self-supervised contrastive learning method.
  • Knee osteoarthritis is a common and debilitating condition, and current grading methods can be subjective and inconsistent.
  • The authors aim to develop a more reliable and objective way to assess osteoarthritis severity using medical imaging data.

Plain English Explanation

Knee osteoarthritis is a condition where the cartilage in the knee joint wears down over time, leading to pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Doctors often use X-ray images to grade the severity of osteoarthritis on a scale, but this method can be subjective and inconsistent between different doctors.

The researchers in this paper wanted to find a more reliable way to assess osteoarthritis severity. They used a technique called "few-shot self-supervised contrastive learning" to train a machine learning model to analyze X-ray images and automatically grade the severity of osteoarthritis. This approach only requires a small number of labeled training images, making it more practical than methods that need a large labeled dataset.

The key idea is to have the model learn useful features from the X-ray images in a self-supervised way, without needing detailed labels. The model then uses these learned features to quickly adapt and grade the severity of osteoarthritis in new images, even with just a few labeled examples. This could lead to more consistent and objective assessments of osteoarthritis, which could improve patient care and treatment decisions.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a few-shot self-supervised contrastive learning approach for assessing the severity of knee osteoarthritis from X-ray images. The method first trains a neural network in a self-supervised manner to learn useful visual representations from the unlabeled X-ray images. This is done using a contrastive learning objective, which encourages the model to extract features that can distinguish between similar and dissimilar image patches.

Once the self-supervised pretraining is complete, the model is then fine-tuned on a small number of labeled X-ray images to predict the osteoarthritis severity grade. The authors show that this few-shot fine-tuning approach can achieve high accuracy on the grading task, outperforming models trained from scratch or using traditional transfer learning.

Experiments are conducted on two knee X-ray datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method. The authors also analyze the learned visual representations and show that they capture meaningful features related to osteoarthritis, such as joint space narrowing and osteophyte formation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for automating the grading of knee osteoarthritis severity, which could help improve consistency and objectivity in clinical assessments. The few-shot fine-tuning strategy is particularly compelling, as it reduces the need for large labeled datasets that can be difficult to obtain in medical imaging.

However, the paper does not fully address some potential limitations and caveats. For example, the performance of the method may be sensitive to the quality and diversity of the training data, and it's unclear how well it would generalize to X-ray images from different imaging protocols or populations.

Additionally, while the authors analyze the learned visual representations, more work may be needed to fully understand the model's decision-making process and ensure it is basing its predictions on clinically relevant features, rather than potentially spurious correlations.

Further research is also needed to evaluate the clinical utility and real-world impact of this approach, such as comparing it to human expert assessments and assessing its ability to predict important clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel few-shot self-supervised contrastive learning approach for automating the grading of knee osteoarthritis severity from X-ray images. The method shows promising results in terms of accuracy and efficiency, requiring only a small number of labeled examples for fine-tuning.

If further developed and validated, this technique could lead to more consistent and objective assessments of osteoarthritis, which could in turn improve patient care and treatment decisions. The self-supervised pretraining strategy also highlights the potential for leveraging unlabeled medical imaging data to build more robust and generalizable models.

Overall, this research represents an important step towards the development of more advanced and clinically useful AI tools for musculoskeletal disease assessment and management.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Rethinking Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading: A Few Shot Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Approach
Total Score

0

Rethinking Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading: A Few Shot Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning Approach

Niamh Belton, Misgina Tsighe Hagos, Aonghus Lawlor, Kathleen M. Curran

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating disease affecting over 250 million people worldwide. Currently, radiologists grade the severity of OA on an ordinal scale from zero to four using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) system. Recent studies have raised concern in relation to the subjectivity of the KL grading system, highlighting the requirement for an automated system, while also indicating that five ordinal classes may not be the most appropriate approach for assessing OA severity. This work presents preliminary results of an automated system with a continuous grading scale. This system, namely SS-FewSOME, uses self-supervised pre-training to learn robust representations of the features of healthy knee X-rays. It then assesses the OA severity by the X-rays' distance to the normal representation space. SS-FewSOME initially trains on only 'few' examples of healthy knee X-rays, thus reducing the barriers to clinical implementation by eliminating the need for large training sets and costly expert annotations that existing automated systems require. The work reports promising initial results, obtaining a positive Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of 0.43, having had access to only 30 ground truth labels at training time.

Read more

7/16/2024

An AI System for Continuous Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading Using Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection with Limited Data
Total Score

0

An AI System for Continuous Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading Using Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection with Limited Data

Niamh Belton, Aonghus Lawlor, Kathleen M. Curran

The diagnostic accuracy and subjectivity of existing Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) ordinal grading systems has been a subject of on-going debate and concern. Existing automated solutions are trained to emulate these imperfect systems, whilst also being reliant on large annotated databases for fully-supervised training. This work proposes a three stage approach for automated continuous grading of knee OA that is built upon the principles of Anomaly Detection (AD); learning a robust representation of healthy knee X-rays and grading disease severity based on its distance to the centre of normality. In the first stage, SS-FewSOME is proposed, a self-supervised AD technique that learns the 'normal' representation, requiring only examples of healthy subjects and <3% of the labels that existing methods require. In the second stage, this model is used to pseudo label a subset of unlabelled data as 'normal' or 'anomalous', followed by denoising of pseudo labels with CLIP. The final stage involves retraining on labelled and pseudo labelled data using the proposed Dual Centre Representation Learning (DCRL) which learns the centres of two representation spaces; normal and anomalous. Disease severity is then graded based on the distance to the learned centres. The proposed methodology outperforms existing techniques by margins of up to 24% in terms of OA detection and the disease severity scores correlate with the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system at the same level as human expert performance. Code available at https://github.com/niamhbelton/SS-FewSOME_Disease_Severity_Knee_Osteoarthritis.

Read more

7/17/2024

Active Sensing of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression with Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Active Sensing of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression with Reinforcement Learning

Khanh Nguyen, Huy Hoang Nguyen, Egor Panfilov, Aleksei Tiulpin

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal disease, which has no cure. Knee OA (KOA) is one of the highest causes of disability worldwide, and it costs billions of United States dollars to the global community. Prediction of KOA progression has been of high interest to the community for years, as it can advance treatment development through more efficient clinical trials and improve patient outcomes through more efficient healthcare utilization. Existing approaches for predicting KOA, however, are predominantly static, i.e. consider data from a single time point to predict progression many years into the future, and knee level, i.e. consider progression in a single joint only. Due to these and related reasons, these methods fail to deliver the level of predictive performance, which is sufficient to result in cost savings and better patient outcomes. Collecting extensive data from all patients on a regular basis could address the issue, but it is limited by the high cost at a population level. In this work, we propose to go beyond static prediction models in OA, and bring a novel Active Sensing (AS) approach, designed to dynamically follow up patients with the objective of maximizing the number of informative data acquisitions, while minimizing their total cost over a period of time. Our approach is based on Reinforcement Learning (RL), and it leverages a novel reward function designed specifically for AS of disease progression in more than one part of a human body. Our method is end-to-end, relies on multi-modal Deep Learning, and requires no human input at inference time. Throughout an exhaustive experimental evaluation, we show that using RL can provide a higher monetary benefit when compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Read more

8/23/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Modified Risk Formulation for Improving the Prediction of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression

Haresh Rengaraj Rajamohan, Richard Kijowski, Kyunghyun Cho, Cem M. Deniz

Current methods for predicting osteoarthritis (OA) outcomes do not incorporate disease specific prior knowledge to improve the outcome prediction models. We developed a novel approach that effectively uses consecutive imaging studies to improve OA outcome predictions by incorporating an OA severity constraint. This constraint ensures that the risk of OA for a knee should either increase or remain the same over time. DL models were trained to predict TKR within multiple time periods (1 year, 2 years, and 4 years) using knee radiographs and MRI scans. Models with and without the risk constraint were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) analysis. The novel RiskFORM2 method, leveraging a dual model risk constraint architecture, demonstrated superior performance, yielding an AUROC of 0.87 and AUPRC of 0.47 for 1 year TKR prediction on the OAI radiograph test set, a marked improvement over the 0.79 AUROC and 0.34 AUPRC of the baseline approach. The performance advantage extended to longer followup periods, with RiskFORM2 maintaining a high AUROC of 0.86 and AUPRC of 0.75 in predicting TKR within 4 years. Additionally, when generalizing to the external MOST radiograph test set, RiskFORM2 generalized better with an AUROC of 0.77 and AUPRC of 0.25 for 1 year predictions, which was higher than the 0.71 AUROC and 0.19 AUPRC of the baseline approach. In the MRI test sets, similar patterns emerged, with RiskFORM2 outperforming the baseline approach consistently. However, RiskFORM1 exhibited the highest AUROC of 0.86 and AUPRC of 0.72 for 4 year predictions on the OAI set.

Read more

6/17/2024