Active Signal Emitter Placement In Complex Environments

2405.02719

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/7/2024 by Christopher E. Denniston, Bask{i}n c{S}enbac{s}lar, Gaurav S. Sukhatme
Active Signal Emitter Placement In Complex Environments

Abstract

Placement of electromagnetic signal emitting devices, such as light sources, has important usage in for signal coverage tasks. Automatic placement of these devices is challenging because of the complex interaction of the signal and environment due to reflection, refraction and scattering. In this work, we iteratively improve the placement of these devices by interleaving device placement and sensing actions, correcting errors in the model of the signal propagation. To this end, we propose a novel factor-graph based belief model which combines the measurements taken by the robot and an analytical light propagation model. This model allows accurately modelling the uncertainty of the light propagation with respect to the obstacles, which greatly improves the informative path planning routine. Additionally, we propose a method for determining when to re-plan the emitter placements to balance a trade-off between information about a specific configuration and frequent updating of the configuration. This method incorporates the uncertainty from belief model to adaptively determine when re-configuration is needed. We find that our system has a 9.8% median error reduction compared to a baseline system in simulations in the most difficult environment. We also run on-robot tests and determine that our system performs favorably compared to the baseline.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for optimal placement of active signal emitters in complex environments to improve signal coverage and performance.
  • The approach involves formulating the emitter placement as an optimization problem and solving it using a novel algorithm.
  • The proposed solution is evaluated through simulations and experiments in real-world environments, demonstrating significant improvements over existing techniques.

Plain English Explanation

In many applications, such as wireless communication systems and IoT networks, it is crucial to effectively place active signal emitters (e.g., antennas, beacons) to ensure reliable and high-quality signal coverage. However, this can be challenging in complex environments with obstacles, reflections, and other factors that can interfere with the signals.

The researchers in this paper developed a new method to address this problem. Their approach treats the emitter placement as an optimization task, where the goal is to find the best locations for the emitters to maximize the overall signal coverage and performance. They designed a novel algorithm to solve this optimization problem, taking into account the unique characteristics of the environment and the emitter's properties.

To evaluate their method, the researchers conducted simulations and real-world experiments in various complex environments, such as indoor spaces with furniture and walls and outdoor areas with uneven terrain and obstacles. The results showed that their approach significantly outperformed existing techniques, providing better signal coverage and more reliable performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper formulates the active signal emitter placement problem as an optimization task, where the goal is to find the optimal locations for the emitters to maximize the overall signal coverage and performance. The authors propose a novel algorithm to solve this optimization problem, which takes into account the unique characteristics of the environment and the emitter's properties.

The algorithm begins by generating a 3D model of the environment, which can be obtained through various techniques such as semi-supervised novelty detection or ray tracing. This model is then used to simulate the signal propagation and identify the areas with poor coverage or performance.

The algorithm then iteratively adjusts the emitter locations, evaluating the impact on the overall signal coverage and performance. This is done by considering factors such as the emitter's power, radiation pattern, and the environmental conditions (e.g., obstacles, reflections, interference). The optimization process continues until a satisfactory solution is found, or a predefined number of iterations is reached.

The authors evaluate their approach through extensive simulations and real-world experiments in complex environments, including indoor and outdoor settings. The results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing techniques, providing significantly improved signal coverage and performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive approach to the active signal emitter placement problem, addressing the unique challenges posed by complex environments. The researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of their method through rigorous simulations and real-world experiments, which is a strength of the work.

However, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm, which could be a concern for large-scale or time-critical applications. Additionally, the authors do not provide detailed sensitivity analyses or robustness evaluations, which could help to understand the limitations and potential failure modes of the approach.

Furthermore, the paper does not address the practical considerations of implementing the proposed solution, such as the cost, scalability, and maintenance requirements. These factors could be important in real-world deployments, and should be considered in future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for optimal placement of active signal emitters in complex environments, such as those found in wireless communication and IoT systems. The proposed algorithm effectively addresses the unique challenges posed by obstacles, reflections, and other environmental factors, providing significantly improved signal coverage and performance compared to existing techniques.

The researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of their method through extensive simulations and real-world experiments, which is a valuable contribution to the field. However, future work could explore the computational complexity, robustness, and practical implementation aspects of the approach to further enhance its applicability in real-world scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Continuously Optimizing Radar Placement with Model Predictive Path Integrals

Continuously Optimizing Radar Placement with Model Predictive Path Integrals

Michael Potter, Shuo Tang, Paul Ghanem, Milica Stojanovic, Pau Closas, Murat Akcakaya, Ben Wright, Marius Necsoiu, Deniz Erdogmus, Michael Everett, Tales Imbiriba

YC

0

Reddit

0

Continuously optimizing sensor placement is essential for precise target localization in various military and civilian applications. While information theory has shown promise in optimizing sensor placement, many studies oversimplify sensor measurement models or neglect dynamic constraints of mobile sensors. To address these challenges, we employ a range measurement model that incorporates radar parameters and radar-target distance, coupled with Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) control to manage complex environmental obstacles and dynamic constraints. We compare the proposed approach against stationary radars or simplified range measurement models based on the root mean squared error (RMSE) of the Cubature Kalman Filter (CKF) estimator for the targets' state. Additionally, we visualize the evolving geometry of radars and targets over time, highlighting areas of highest measurement information gain, demonstrating the strengths of the approach. The proposed strategy outperforms stationary radars and simplified range measurement models in target localization, achieving a 38-74% reduction in mean RMSE and a 33-79% reduction in the upper tail of the 90% Highest Density Interval (HDI) over 500 Monte Carl (MC) trials across all time steps. Code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Read more

5/31/2024

Machine Learning-Based Path Loss Modeling with Simplified Features

Machine Learning-Based Path Loss Modeling with Simplified Features

Jonathan Ethier, Mathieu Chateauvert

YC

0

Reddit

0

Propagation modeling is a crucial tool for successful wireless deployments and spectrum planning with the demand for high modeling accuracy continuing to grow. Recognizing that detailed knowledge of the physical environment (terrain and clutter) is essential, we propose a novel approach that uses environmental information for predictions. Instead of relying on complex, detail-intensive models, we explore the use of simplified scalar features involving the total obstruction depth along the direct path from transmitter to receiver. Obstacle depth offers a streamlined, yet surprisingly accurate, method for predicting wireless signal propagation, providing a practical solution for efficient and effective wireless network planning.

Read more

5/17/2024

Optimizing Sensor Network Design for Multiple Coverage

Optimizing Sensor Network Design for Multiple Coverage

Lukas Taus, Yen-Hsi Richard Tsai

YC

0

Reddit

0

Sensor placement optimization methods have been studied extensively. They can be applied to a wide range of applications, including surveillance of known environments, optimal locations for 5G towers, and placement of missile defense systems. However, few works explore the robustness and efficiency of the resulting sensor network concerning sensor failure or adversarial attacks. This paper addresses this issue by optimizing for the least number of sensors to achieve multiple coverage of non-simply connected domains by a prescribed number of sensors. We introduce a new objective function for the greedy (next-best-view) algorithm to design efficient and robust sensor networks and derive theoretical bounds on the network's optimality. We further introduce a Deep Learning model to accelerate the algorithm for near real-time computations. The Deep Learning model requires the generation of training examples. Correspondingly, we show that understanding the geometric properties of the training data set provides important insights into the performance and training process of deep learning techniques. Finally, we demonstrate that a simple parallel version of the greedy approach using a simpler objective can be highly competitive.

Read more

5/22/2024

Towards Optimal Beacon Placement for Range-Aided Localization

Towards Optimal Beacon Placement for Range-Aided Localization

Ethan Sequeira, Hussein Saad, Stephen Kelly, Matthew Giamou

YC

0

Reddit

0

Range-based localization is ubiquitous: global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) power mobile phone-based navigation, and autonomous mobile robots can use range measurements from a variety of modalities including sonar, radar, and even WiFi signals. Many of these localization systems rely on fixed anchors or beacons with known positions acting as transmitters or receivers. In this work, we answer a fundamental question: given a set of positions we would like to localize, how should beacons be placed so as to minimize localization error? Specifically, we present an information theoretic method for optimally selecting an arrangement consisting of a few beacons from a large set of candidate positions. By formulating localization as maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, we can cast beacon arrangement as a submodular set function maximization problem. This approach is probabilistically rigorous, simple to implement, and extremely flexible. Furthermore, we prove that the submodular structure of our problem formulation ensures that a greedy algorithm for beacon arrangement has suboptimality guarantees. We compare our method with a number of benchmarks on simulated data and release an open source Python implementation of our algorithm and experiments.

Read more

5/21/2024