Adaptive Backtracking For Faster Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces an "Adaptive Backtracking" method for optimization problems.
- The key idea is to adaptively adjust the step size during the optimization process based on the progress made.
- This allows the method to converge faster than traditional backtracking approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new technique called "Adaptive Backtracking" for optimization problems. Optimization problems involve finding the best set of values for a given objective function, subject to some constraints.
Traditional optimization methods use a fixed step size, meaning they take a predetermined step in each iteration. The "Adaptive Backtracking" approach, on the other hand, dynamically adjusts the step size based on how much progress is being made. If the current step is making good progress, it increases the step size to move faster. If the step is not making much progress, it decreases the step size to avoid overshooting.
This adaptive step size allows the optimization process to converge more quickly than traditional fixed-step methods. The authors show that their Adaptive Backtracking approach can outperform existing optimization techniques on a variety of test problems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces an "Adaptive Backtracking" method for optimization problems. The key idea is to dynamically adjust the step size during the optimization process based on the progress being made.
Specifically, the method maintains a step size parameter that starts at an initial value. In each iteration, it first takes a step using this step size. It then evaluates the objective function at the new point. If the function value has decreased sufficiently, it increases the step size for the next iteration. If the function value has not decreased enough, it decreases the step size.
This adaptive step size adjustment allows the method to converge more efficiently than traditional backtracking approaches with a fixed step size. The authors provide theoretical analysis showing that the Adaptive Backtracking method enjoys favorable convergence properties.
They also demonstrate the empirical performance of Adaptive Backtracking on a variety of optimization test problems, showing that it can outperform existing state-of-the-art optimization techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical and empirical analysis of the Adaptive Backtracking method. The authors carefully consider the convergence properties of the approach and validate its effectiveness through comprehensive experiments.
One potential limitation is that the method may require careful tuning of the initial step size and the step size adjustment parameters to achieve optimal performance. The authors acknowledge this and suggest investigating more automatic step size adaptation as an area for future work.
Additionally, the paper focuses on unconstrained optimization problems. It would be interesting to see how the Adaptive Backtracking method could be extended to handle optimization problems with constraints.
Overall, the paper presents a promising new optimization technique that could have significant practical impact in a variety of domains.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an "Adaptive Backtracking" method for optimization problems. The key innovation is the adaptive adjustment of the step size during the optimization process, which allows the method to converge faster than traditional backtracking approaches.
The authors provide a thorough theoretical analysis of the method's convergence properties and demonstrate its empirical performance on a range of optimization test problems. While the method may require careful tuning in some cases, it represents a promising new direction for improving the efficiency of optimization algorithms.
The Adaptive Backtracking approach could have far-reaching implications for a wide range of applications that rely on optimization, such as machine learning, robotics, and scientific computing. Further research into extensions and applications of this technique could yield valuable insights and advancements in the field of optimization.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Adaptive Backtracking For Faster Optimization
Joao V. Cavalcanti, Laurent Lessard, Ashia C. Wilson
Backtracking line search is foundational in numerical optimization. The basic idea is to adjust the step size of an algorithm by a constant factor until some chosen criterion (e.g. Armijo, Goldstein, Descent Lemma) is satisfied. We propose a new way for adjusting step sizes, replacing the constant factor used in regular backtracking with one that takes into account the degree to which the chosen criterion is violated, without additional computational burden. For convex problems, we prove adaptive backtracking requires fewer adjustments to produce a feasible step size than regular backtracking does for two popular line search criteria: the Armijo condition and the descent lemma. For nonconvex smooth problems, we additionally prove adaptive backtracking enjoys the same guarantees of regular backtracking. Finally, we perform a variety of experiments on over fifteen real world datasets, all of which confirm that adaptive backtracking often leads to significantly faster optimization.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Safeguarding adaptive methods: global convergence of Barzilai-Borwein and other stepsize choices
Hongjia Ou, Andreas Themelis
Leveraging on recent advancements on adaptive methods for convex minimization problems, this paper provides a linesearch-free proximal gradient framework for globalizing the convergence of popular stepsize choices such as Barzilai-Borwein and one-dimensional Anderson acceleration. This framework can cope with problems in which the gradient of the differentiable function is merely locally Holder continuous. Our analysis not only encompasses but also refines existing results upon which it builds. The theory is corroborated by numerical evidence that showcases the synergetic interplay between fast stepsize selections and adaptive methods.
Read more5/14/2024
🛠️
0
A simple uniformly optimal method without line search for convex optimization
Tianjiao Li, Guanghui Lan
Line search (or backtracking) procedures have been widely employed into first-order methods for solving convex optimization problems, especially those with unknown problem parameters (e.g., Lipschitz constant). In this paper, we show that line search is superfluous in attaining the optimal rate of convergence for solving a convex optimization problem whose parameters are not given a priori. In particular, we present a novel accelerated gradient descent type algorithm called auto-conditioned fast gradient method (AC-FGM) that can achieve an optimal $mathcal{O}(1/k^2)$ rate of convergence for smooth convex optimization without requiring the estimate of a global Lipschitz constant or the employment of line search procedures. We then extend AC-FGM to solve convex optimization problems with H{o}lder continuous gradients and show that it automatically achieves the optimal rates of convergence uniformly for all problem classes with the desired accuracy of the solution as the only input. Finally, we report some encouraging numerical results that demonstrate the advantages of AC-FGM over the previously developed parameter-free methods for convex optimization.
Read more8/20/2024
🛠️
0
Adaptive and Optimal Second-order Optimistic Methods for Minimax Optimization
Ruichen Jiang, Ali Kavis, Qiujiang Jin, Sujay Sanghavi, Aryan Mokhtari
We propose adaptive, line search-free second-order methods with optimal rate of convergence for solving convex-concave min-max problems. By means of an adaptive step size, our algorithms feature a simple update rule that requires solving only one linear system per iteration, eliminating the need for line search or backtracking mechanisms. Specifically, we base our algorithms on the optimistic method and appropriately combine it with second-order information. Moreover, distinct from common adaptive schemes, we define the step size recursively as a function of the gradient norm and the prediction error in the optimistic update. We first analyze a variant where the step size requires knowledge of the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Under the additional assumption of Lipschitz continuous gradients, we further design a parameter-free version by tracking the Hessian Lipschitz constant locally and ensuring the iterates remain bounded. We also evaluate the practical performance of our algorithm by comparing it to existing second-order algorithms for minimax optimization.
Read more6/5/2024