Adaptive Control in Assistive Application -- A Study Evaluating Shared Control by Users with Limited Upper Limb Mobility
2406.06103
0
0
Abstract
Shared control in assistive robotics blends human autonomy with computer assistance, thus simplifying complex tasks for individuals with physical impairments. This study assesses an adaptive Degrees of Freedom control method specifically tailored for individuals with upper limb impairments. It employs a between-subjects analysis with 24 participants, conducting 81 trials across three distinct input devices in a realistic everyday-task setting. Given the diverse capabilities of the vulnerable target demographic and the known challenges in statistical comparisons due to individual differences, the study focuses primarily on subjective qualitative data. The results reveal consistently high success rates in trial completions, irrespective of the input device used. Participants appreciated their involvement in the research process, displayed a positive outlook, and quick adaptability to the control system. Notably, each participant effectively managed the given task within a short time frame.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the use of shared control in assistive robotic applications for users with limited upper limb mobility.
- The study evaluates the effectiveness of adaptive control strategies that combine user input with autonomous system capabilities to improve task performance and user experience.
- The paper investigates how different levels of shared control affect user interaction and task outcomes, providing insights for the design of more effective assistive technologies.
Plain English Explanation
Assistive robots can help people with disabilities or limited mobility perform everyday tasks more easily. In this study, the researchers looked at ways to combine human control and autonomous robot control in these assistive systems. They wanted to see how much control the user should have versus how much control the robot should have, and how that affects the user's experience and ability to complete tasks.
The key idea is "shared control" - the robot and the user work together, with the robot providing some automatic assistance based on the user's inputs. This is similar to how self-driving cars combine human control and autonomous features.
The researchers tested different levels of shared control with users who have limited mobility in their arms and hands. They looked at how well the users could perform tasks, how much mental effort it took them, and how satisfied they were with the experience.
Overall, the study provides insights into designing better assistive robots that can adapt to the user's needs and preferences. This builds on previous work on transitional XR frameworks for shared control and the design of compact 3D end-effectors for assistive applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an experimental study that evaluates the use of shared control in assistive robotic applications for users with limited upper limb mobility. The researchers investigated how different levels of adaptive control, which blends user input with autonomous system capabilities, impact task performance, user workload, and user experience.
The study used a robotic manipulator with a 3D end-effector to assist participants in completing pick-and-place tasks. The design and evaluation of such compact 3D end-effectors is an important consideration for assistive robotics. Participants operated the robot under three control conditions:
- Shared Control: The robot's autonomous control adapted to the user's inputs to provide varying levels of assistance.
- Autonomous Control: The robot operated autonomously without user input.
- Manual Control: The user had full manual control of the robot.
The researchers measured task completion time, user workload, and user preference to assess the impact of the control modes. This builds on prior work on shared autonomy via variable impedance control and virtual fixtures.
The results showed that the shared control condition led to the best overall performance, with users completing tasks faster and reporting lower workload compared to the other conditions. Participants also expressed a strong preference for the shared control approach, indicating it provided an effective balance of user control and autonomous assistance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of shared control strategies in the context of assistive robotics, offering valuable insights for the design of such systems. However, the study does have some limitations:
- The participant pool was relatively small (N=12), so the findings may not fully generalize to a broader population of users with upper limb disabilities.
- The tasks evaluated were relatively simple pick-and-place operations, and it's unclear how the results would scale to more complex or varied tasks.
- The paper does not provide detailed information on the specific control algorithms and adaptive strategies used, making it difficult to fully assess their technical implementation and potential for further refinement.
Overall, the study presents a valuable contribution to the understanding of shared control in assistive robotics, but additional research is needed to fully explore the potential and limitations of these techniques for users with diverse needs and capabilities.
Conclusion
This research paper offers important insights into the design of shared control systems for assistive robotics applications. The experimental evaluation demonstrates the benefits of blending user input with autonomous capabilities, leading to improved task performance and user experience for individuals with limited upper limb mobility.
The findings suggest that adaptive shared control strategies can effectively support users in completing everyday tasks, reducing their cognitive workload and providing a more satisfying interaction. These insights can inform the development of next-generation assistive technologies that better adapt to the needs and preferences of users, empowering them to live more independently and participate more actively in their daily lives.
Further research is needed to explore the scalability of these approaches, their applicability to more complex tasks, and the integration of advanced control algorithms and safety mechanisms. Nonetheless, this study represents an important step forward in the field of assistive robotics, paving the way for more personalized and effective solutions to support individuals with physical disabilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
➖
Socially-Aware Shared Control Navigation for Assistive Mobile Robots in the Built Environment
Yifan Xu, Qianwei Wang, Vineet Kamat, Carol Menassa
0
0
As the number of Persons with Disabilities (PWD), particularly those with one or more physical impairments, increases, there is an increasing demand for assistive robotic technologies that can support independent mobility in the built environment and reduce the burden on caregivers. Current assistive mobility platforms (e.g., robotic wheelchairs) often fail to incorporate user preferences and control, leading to reduced trust and efficiency. Existing shared control algorithms do not allow the incorporation of the user control preferences inside the navigation framework or the path planning algorithm. In addition, existing dynamic local planner algorithms for robotic wheelchairs do not take into account the social spaces of people, potentially leading such platforms to infringe upon these areas and cause discomfort. To address these concerns, this work introduces a novel socially-aware shared autonomy-based navigation system for assistive mobile robotic platforms. Our navigation framework comprises a Global Planner and a Local Planner. To implement the Global Planner, the proposed approach introduces a novel User Preference Field (UPF) theory within its global planning framework, explicitly acknowledging user preferences to adeptly navigate away from congested areas. For the Local Planner, we propose a Socially-aware Shared Control-based Model Predictive Control with Dynamic Control Barrier Function (SS-MPC-DCBF) to adjust movements in real-time, integrating user preferences for safer, more autonomous navigation. Evaluation results show that our Global Planner aligns closely with user preferences compared to baselines, and our Local Planner demonstrates enhanced safety and efficiency in dynamic and static scenarios. This integrated approach fosters trust and autonomy, crucial for the acceptance of assistive mobility technologies in the built environment.
5/28/2024
🤖
AdaptiX -- A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive Robotics
Max Pascher, Felix Ferdinand Goldau, Kirill Kronhardt, Udo Frese, Jens Gerken
0
0
With the ongoing efforts to empower people with mobility impairments and the increase in technological acceptance by the general public, assistive technologies, such as collaborative robotic arms, are gaining popularity. Yet, their widespread success is limited by usability issues, specifically the disparity between user input and software control along the autonomy continuum. To address this, shared control concepts provide opportunities to combine the targeted increase of user autonomy with a certain level of computer assistance. This paper presents the free and open-source AdaptiX XR framework for developing and evaluating shared control applications in a high-resolution simulation environment. The initial framework consists of a simulated robotic arm with an example scenario in Virtual Reality (VR), multiple standard control interfaces, and a specialized recording/replay system. AdaptiX can easily be extended for specific research needs, allowing Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers to rapidly design and test novel interaction methods, intervention strategies, and multi-modal feedback techniques, without requiring an actual physical robotic arm during the early phases of ideation, prototyping, and evaluation. Also, a Robot Operating System (ROS) integration enables the controlling of a real robotic arm in a PhysicalTwin approach without any simulation-reality gap. Here, we review the capabilities and limitations of AdaptiX in detail and present three bodies of research based on the framework. AdaptiX can be accessed at https://adaptix.robot-research.de.
5/20/2024
Design and Control of a Low-cost Non-backdrivable End-effector Upper Limb Rehabilitation Device
Fulan Li, Yunfei Guo, Wenda Xu, Weide Zhang, Fangyun Zhao, Baiyu Wang, Huaguang Du, Chengkun Zhang
0
0
This paper presents the development of an upper limb end-effector based rehabilitation device for stroke patients, offering assistance or resistance along any 2-dimensional trajectory during physical therapy. It employs a non-backdrivable ball-screw-driven mechanism for enhanced control accuracy. The control system features three novel algorithms: First, the Implicit Euler velocity control algorithm (IEVC) highlighted for its state-of-the-art accuracy, stability, efficiency and generalizability in motion restriction control. Second, an Admittance Virtual Dynamics simulation algorithm that achieves a smooth and natural human interaction with the non-backdrivable end-effector. Third, a generalized impedance force calculation algorithm allowing efficient impedance control on any trajectory or area boundary. Experimental validation demonstrated the system's effectiveness in accurate end-effector position control across various trajectories and configurations. The proposed upper limb end-effector-based rehabilitation device, with its high performance and adaptability, holds significant promise for extensive clinical application, potentially improving rehabilitation outcomes for stroke patients.
6/24/2024
❗
The Brain-Inspired Cooperative Shared Control for Brain-Machine Interface
Shengjie Zheng, Ling Liu, Junjie Yang, Lang Qian, Gang Gao, Xin Chen, Wenqi Jin, Chunshan Deng, Xiaojian Li
0
0
In the practical application of brain-machine interface technology, the problem often faced is the low information content and high noise of the neural signals collected by the electrode and the difficulty of decoding by the decoder, which makes it difficult for the robotic to obtain stable instructions to complete the task. The idea based on the principle of cooperative shared control can be achieved by extracting general motor commands from brain activity, while the fine details of the movement can be hosted to the robot for completion, or the brain can have complete control. This study proposes a brain-machine interface shared control system based on spiking neural networks for robotic arm movement control and wheeled robots wheel speed control and steering, respectively. The former can reliably control the robotic arm to move to the destination position, while the latter controls the wheeled robots for object tracking and map generation. The results show that the shared control based on brain-inspired intelligence can perform some typical tasks in complex environments and positively improve the fluency and ease of use of brain-machine interaction, and also demonstrate the potential of this control method in clinical applications of brain-machine interfaces.
6/27/2024