AdaptiX -- A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive Robotics

Read original: arXiv:2310.15887 - Published 5/20/2024 by Max Pascher, Felix Ferdinand Goldau, Kirill Kronhardt, Udo Frese, Jens Gerken
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents the AdaptiX XR framework, a free and open-source tool for developing and evaluating shared control applications in a high-resolution simulation environment.
  • Shared control combines user autonomy with computer assistance to address usability issues in assistive technologies like collaborative robotic arms.
  • AdaptiX provides a simulated robotic arm, standard control interfaces, and a specialized recording/replay system, allowing researchers to rapidly design and test novel interaction methods without a physical robot.
  • The framework also enables a Physical Twin approach to control a real robotic arm, bridging the simulation-reality gap.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new tool called AdaptiX that helps researchers develop and test assistive technologies, like robotic arms, that can be controlled by people with mobility impairments. The key challenge with these technologies is finding the right balance between user control and computer assistance, so that the user feels empowered but the system is still easy to use.

AdaptiX provides a simulated robotic arm and various control interfaces that researchers can experiment with. This allows them to try out different ways of combining user input and computer control, without needing to have a physical robot on hand. The framework also has features that make it easy to record and replay user interactions, so researchers can analyze and improve their designs.

Additionally, AdaptiX can connect to a real robotic arm, letting researchers test their ideas in the real world after refining them in the simulation. This helps bridge the gap between the virtual and physical environments, ensuring the technology works as intended when deployed.

Overall, AdaptiX gives researchers a flexible and powerful platform to develop and evaluate assistive technologies, helping to make these tools more usable and accessible for people with mobility challenges.

Technical Explanation

The AdaptiX XR framework, presented in this paper, is a free and open-source tool for developing and evaluating shared control applications in a high-resolution simulation environment. Shared control concepts aim to combine the targeted increase of user autonomy with a certain level of computer assistance, addressing usability issues in assistive technologies like collaborative robotic arms.

The initial AdaptiX framework consists of a simulated robotic arm with an example scenario in Virtual Reality (VR), multiple standard control interfaces, and a specialized recording/replay system. This allows Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers to rapidly design and test novel interaction methods, intervention strategies, and multi-modal feedback techniques, without requiring an actual physical robotic arm during the early phases of ideation, prototyping, and evaluation.

Additionally, the framework's Robot Operating System (ROS) integration enables the controlling of a real robotic arm in a Physical Twin approach without any simulation-reality gap. This allows researchers to validate their findings in a real-world setting after refining their designs in the virtual environment.

The paper reviews the capabilities and limitations of AdaptiX in detail and presents three bodies of research that have been conducted using the framework, demonstrating its versatility and potential impact on the field of assistive technologies.

Critical Analysis

The AdaptiX framework provides a valuable tool for researchers working on shared control applications and assistive technologies. By offering a high-fidelity simulation environment and the ability to connect to physical robotic systems, the framework helps bridge the gap between virtual prototyping and real-world deployment.

However, the paper acknowledges some limitations of the current implementation. For example, the authors note that the simulation environment may not perfectly capture the nuances of real-world interactions, and further work is needed to ensure a seamless transition from the virtual to the physical domain.

Additionally, while the framework supports a wide range of control interfaces and feedback modalities, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific tradeoffs and design considerations for each input/output method. Researchers may need to explore these aspects in more detail to develop truly effective and user-centered shared control solutions.

Finally, the paper would benefit from a more comprehensive discussion of the ethical implications of shared control technology, particularly in the context of assistive devices. Issues of user autonomy, privacy, and safety should be carefully considered as the field of assistive robotics continues to evolve.

Conclusion

The AdaptiX XR framework presented in this paper offers a powerful and flexible platform for researchers working on shared control applications and assistive technologies. By providing a high-fidelity simulation environment, standard control interfaces, and a Physical Twin approach, AdaptiX enables rapid prototyping, testing, and validation of novel interaction methods and intervention strategies.

The framework's open-source nature and ROS integration make it accessible to a wide range of researchers, fostering collaboration and advancing the state of the art in this important field. As assistive technologies continue to evolve and become more widely adopted, tools like AdaptiX will play a crucial role in ensuring these systems are designed with the user's needs and autonomy at the forefront.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

AdaptiX -- A Transitional XR Framework for Development and Evaluation of Shared Control Applications in Assistive Robotics

Max Pascher, Felix Ferdinand Goldau, Kirill Kronhardt, Udo Frese, Jens Gerken

With the ongoing efforts to empower people with mobility impairments and the increase in technological acceptance by the general public, assistive technologies, such as collaborative robotic arms, are gaining popularity. Yet, their widespread success is limited by usability issues, specifically the disparity between user input and software control along the autonomy continuum. To address this, shared control concepts provide opportunities to combine the targeted increase of user autonomy with a certain level of computer assistance. This paper presents the free and open-source AdaptiX XR framework for developing and evaluating shared control applications in a high-resolution simulation environment. The initial framework consists of a simulated robotic arm with an example scenario in Virtual Reality (VR), multiple standard control interfaces, and a specialized recording/replay system. AdaptiX can easily be extended for specific research needs, allowing Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers to rapidly design and test novel interaction methods, intervention strategies, and multi-modal feedback techniques, without requiring an actual physical robotic arm during the early phases of ideation, prototyping, and evaluation. Also, a Robot Operating System (ROS) integration enables the controlling of a real robotic arm in a PhysicalTwin approach without any simulation-reality gap. Here, we review the capabilities and limitations of AdaptiX in detail and present three bodies of research based on the framework. AdaptiX can be accessed at https://adaptix.robot-research.de.

Read more

5/20/2024

Adaptive Control in Assistive Application -- A Study Evaluating Shared Control by Users with Limited Upper Limb Mobility
Total Score

0

Adaptive Control in Assistive Application -- A Study Evaluating Shared Control by Users with Limited Upper Limb Mobility

Felix Ferdinand Goldau, Max Pascher, Annalies Baumeister, Patrizia Tolle, Jens Gerken, Udo Frese

Shared control in assistive robotics blends human autonomy with computer assistance, thus simplifying complex tasks for individuals with physical impairments. This study assesses an adaptive Degrees of Freedom control method specifically tailored for individuals with upper limb impairments. It employs a between-subjects analysis with 24 participants, conducting 81 trials across three distinct input devices in a realistic everyday-task setting. Given the diverse capabilities of the vulnerable target demographic and the known challenges in statistical comparisons due to individual differences, the study focuses primarily on subjective qualitative data. The results reveal consistently high success rates in trial completions, irrespective of the input device used. Participants appreciated their involvement in the research process, displayed a positive outlook, and quick adaptability to the control system. Notably, each participant effectively managed the given task within a short time frame.

Read more

6/11/2024

Exploring AI-enhanced Shared Control for an Assistive Robotic Arm
Total Score

0

Exploring AI-enhanced Shared Control for an Assistive Robotic Arm

Max Pascher, Kirill Kronhardt, Jan Freienstein, Jens Gerken

Assistive technologies and in particular assistive robotic arms have the potential to enable people with motor impairments to live a self-determined life. More and more of these systems have become available for end users in recent years, such as the Kinova Jaco robotic arm. However, they mostly require complex manual control, which can overwhelm users. As a result, researchers have explored ways to let such robots act autonomously. However, at least for this specific group of users, such an approach has shown to be futile. Here, users want to stay in control to achieve a higher level of personal autonomy, to which an autonomous robot runs counter. In our research, we explore how Artifical Intelligence (AI) can be integrated into a shared control paradigm. In particular, we focus on the consequential requirements for the interface between human and robot and how we can keep humans in the loop while still significantly reducing the mental load and required motor skills.

Read more

7/19/2024

XR Prototyping of Mixed Reality Visualizations: Compensating Interaction Latency for a Medical Imaging Robot
Total Score

0

XR Prototyping of Mixed Reality Visualizations: Compensating Interaction Latency for a Medical Imaging Robot

Jan Hendrik Plumer, Kevin Yu, Ulrich Eck, Denis Kalkofen, Philipp Steininger, Nassir Navab, Markus Tatzgern

Researching novel user experiences in medicine is challenging due to limited access to equipment and strict ethical protocols. Extended Reality (XR) simulation technologies offer a cost- and time-efficient solution for developing interactive systems. Recent work has shown Extended Reality Prototyping (XRP)'s potential, but its applicability to specific domains like controlling complex machinery needs further exploration. This paper explores the benefits and limitations of XRP in controlling a mobile medical imaging robot. We compare two XR visualization techniques to reduce perceived latency between user input and robot activation. Our XRP validation study demonstrates its potential for comparative studies, but identifies a gap in modeling human behavior in the analytic XRP validation framework.

Read more

9/17/2024