Adaptive Gradient Enhanced Gaussian Process Surrogates for Inverse Problems
2404.01864
0
0
Abstract
Generating simulated training data needed for constructing sufficiently accurate surrogate models to be used for efficient optimization or parameter identification can incur a huge computational effort in the offline phase. We consider a fully adaptive greedy approach to the computational design of experiments problem using gradient-enhanced Gaussian process regression as surrogates. Designs are incrementally defined by solving an optimization problem for accuracy given a certain computational budget. We address not only the choice of evaluation points but also of required simulation accuracy, both of values and gradients of the forward model. Numerical results show a significant reduction of the computational effort compared to just position-adaptive and static designs as well as a clear benefit of including gradient information into the surrogate training.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper presents an adaptive gradient-enhanced Gaussian process surrogate model for solving inverse problems.
- The approach aims to efficiently estimate parameters in complex physical systems by constructing a surrogate model that captures the relationship between parameters and system outputs.
- The surrogate model is iteratively refined using gradient information to improve its accuracy and efficiency.
- The method is demonstrated on several benchmark inverse problems, showing improved performance compared to standard Gaussian process surrogates.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new technique for solving "inverse problems" - situations where we want to figure out the underlying parameters or properties of a complex system, based on observations of the system's behavior.
Imagine you have a machine that takes in a set of input settings and produces some output. You might want to know what the internal parameters of that machine are, based on the inputs and outputs you measure. This is an inverse problem.
The researchers developed a special type of "surrogate model" - a simplified mathematical representation of the complex system - to help solve these inverse problems more efficiently. Their key innovation is that they allow the surrogate model to be gradually improved or "adapted" by using information about the gradients or slopes of the relationships between inputs and outputs.
This gradient-enhanced approach allows the surrogate model to capture the system's behavior more accurately, using fewer observations or experiments. The end result is that the researchers can estimate the underlying parameters of the system more quickly and accurately compared to standard techniques.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an "adaptive gradient-enhanced Gaussian process" (AGGP) surrogate modeling approach for solving inverse problems. Inverse problems involve estimating the unknown input parameters of a system based on observations of its outputs.
The AGGP method constructs a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate model to approximate the complex forward model that maps the input parameters to the system outputs. Crucially, the surrogate is iteratively refined by incorporating gradient information, which the authors show can significantly improve the accuracy and efficiency of the parameter estimation.
The gradient information is obtained either analytically (if the forward model is differentiable) or via finite differences. This gradient-enhanced GP is then used within a Bayesian optimization framework to efficiently explore the parameter space and identify the optimal parameters that best match the observed system outputs.
The AGGP method is demonstrated on several benchmark inverse problems, including estimating material properties from structural deformation data and recovering the shape of an airfoil from pressure measurements. The results show that the AGGP approach outperforms standard GP surrogates, requiring fewer function evaluations to achieve a given level of accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and well-executed approach for solving inverse problems using gradient-enhanced Gaussian process surrogates. The authors thoroughly validate their method on diverse benchmark problems and demonstrate clear performance improvements over standard techniques.
One potential limitation is the reliance on gradient information, which may not always be available, especially for complex forward models with black-box components. The authors do address this by providing a finite difference approach, but this could introduce additional computational overhead.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the impact of noise or uncertainty in the observed system outputs, which is a common challenge in real-world inverse problems. Further analysis of the method's robustness to such factors would strengthen the claims.
Despite these minor caveats, the AGGP approach represents a valuable contribution to the field of inverse problem solving. The adaptive nature of the surrogate model and its ability to leverage gradient information is a promising direction for improving the efficiency and accuracy of parameter estimation in complex physical systems.
Conclusion
This research paper presents an adaptive gradient-enhanced Gaussian process surrogate modeling technique for solving inverse problems. By iteratively refining the surrogate model with gradient information, the approach can more efficiently estimate the underlying parameters of complex physical systems compared to standard Gaussian process methods.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their AGGP approach on several benchmark problems, showcasing its potential to accelerate parameter identification in a wide range of applications, from material characterization to aerodynamic shape design. While the method has some limitations, it represents an important advancement in surrogate-based inverse problem solving that could have significant implications for fields that rely on accurate parameter estimation, such as engineering, physics, and climate modeling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🐍
Efficient Learning of Accurate Surrogates for Simulations of Complex Systems
A. Diaw, M. McKerns, I. Sagert, L. G. Stanton, M. S. Murillo
0
0
Machine learning methods are increasingly used to build computationally inexpensive surrogates for complex physical models. The predictive capability of these surrogates suffers when data are noisy, sparse, or time-dependent. As we are interested in finding a surrogate that provides valid predictions of any potential future model evaluations, we introduce an online learning method empowered by optimizer-driven sampling. The method has two advantages over current approaches. First, it ensures that all turning points on the model response surface are included in the training data. Second, after any new model evaluations, surrogates are tested and retrained (updated) if the score drops below a validity threshold. Tests on benchmark functions reveal that optimizer-directed sampling generally outperforms traditional sampling methods in terms of accuracy around local extrema, even when the scoring metric favors overall accuracy. We apply our method to simulations of nuclear matter to demonstrate that highly accurate surrogates for the nuclear equation of state can be reliably auto-generated from expensive calculations using a few model evaluations.
5/20/2024
🤯
Variational Bayesian surrogate modelling with application to robust design optimisation
Thomas A. Archbold, Ieva Kazlauskaite, Fehmi Cirak
0
0
Surrogate models provide a quick-to-evaluate approximation to complex computational models and are essential for multi-query problems like design optimisation. The inputs of current computational models are usually high-dimensional and uncertain. We consider Bayesian inference for constructing statistical surrogates with input uncertainties and intrinsic dimensionality reduction. The surrogates are trained by fitting to data from prevalent deterministic computational models. The assumed prior probability density of the surrogate is a Gaussian process. We determine the respective posterior probability density and parameters of the posited statistical model using variational Bayes. The non-Gaussian posterior is approximated by a simpler trial density with free variational parameters and the discrepancy between them is measured using the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. We employ the stochastic gradient method to compute the variational parameters and other statistical model parameters by minimising the KL divergence. We demonstrate the accuracy and versatility of the proposed reduced dimension variational Gaussian process (RDVGP) surrogate on illustrative and robust structural optimisation problems with cost functions depending on a weighted sum of the mean and standard deviation of model outputs.
4/24/2024
Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics
Kislaya Ravi, Vladyslav Fediukov, Felix Dietrich, Tobias Neckel, Fabian Buse, Michael Bergmann, Hans-Joachim Bungartz
0
0
One of the main challenges in surrogate modeling is the limited availability of data due to resource constraints associated with computationally expensive simulations. Multi-fidelity methods provide a solution by chaining models in a hierarchy with increasing fidelity, associated with lower error, but increasing cost. In this paper, we compare different multi-fidelity methods employed in constructing Gaussian process surrogates for regression. Non-linear autoregressive methods in the existing literature are primarily confined to two-fidelity models, and we extend these methods to handle more than two levels of fidelity. Additionally, we propose enhancements for an existing method incorporating delay terms by introducing a structured kernel. We demonstrate the performance of these methods across various academic and real-world scenarios. Our findings reveal that multi-fidelity methods generally have a smaller prediction error for the same computational cost as compared to the single-fidelity method, although their effectiveness varies across different scenarios.
4/19/2024
🏷️
Improving Linear System Solvers for Hyperparameter Optimisation in Iterative Gaussian Processes
Jihao Andreas Lin, Shreyas Padhy, Bruno Mlodozeniec, Javier Antor'an, Jos'e Miguel Hern'andez-Lobato
0
0
Scaling hyperparameter optimisation to very large datasets remains an open problem in the Gaussian process community. This paper focuses on iterative methods, which use linear system solvers, like conjugate gradients, alternating projections or stochastic gradient descent, to construct an estimate of the marginal likelihood gradient. We discuss three key improvements which are applicable across solvers: (i) a pathwise gradient estimator, which reduces the required number of solver iterations and amortises the computational cost of making predictions, (ii) warm starting linear system solvers with the solution from the previous step, which leads to faster solver convergence at the cost of negligible bias, (iii) early stopping linear system solvers after a limited computational budget, which synergises with warm starting, allowing solver progress to accumulate over multiple marginal likelihood steps. These techniques provide speed-ups of up to $72times$ when solving to tolerance, and decrease the average residual norm by up to $7times$ when stopping early.
6/7/2024