Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Conversational Systems

Read original: arXiv:2407.21712 - Published 8/1/2024 by Xi Wang, Procheta Sen, Ruizhe Li, Emine Yilmaz
Total Score

0

Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Conversational Systems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Proposes an adaptive retrieval-augmented generation (ARAG) approach for improving the performance of conversational systems
  • Dynamically selects the most appropriate retrieval module based on the current conversation context
  • Integrates retrieved information into the language generation process to enhance the relevance and coherence of system responses

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces an adaptive retrieval-augmented generation (ARAG) approach for conversational systems. Conventional retrieval-augmented generation models use a fixed retrieval module to supplement the language generation process. In contrast, ARAG dynamically selects the most suitable retrieval module based on the current conversation context.

This adaptive selection allows the system to leverage the most relevant external information to generate coherent and informative responses. The retrieved information is then seamlessly integrated into the language generation process, enhancing the overall quality and relevance of the system's responses.

By adapting the retrieval module to the conversation context, ARAG aims to improve the performance of conversational systems, making them more engaging and helpful for users.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an adaptive retrieval-augmented generation (ARAG) framework for conversational systems. The key components of ARAG include:

  1. Retrieval Module Selection: The system dynamically selects the most appropriate retrieval module based on the current conversation context. This is achieved through a gating mechanism that evaluates the suitability of each retrieval module and chooses the one that is most relevant.

  2. Retrieval-Augmented Generation: The selected retrieval module is used to gather relevant information, which is then integrated into the language generation process. This integration helps to enhance the relevance, coherence, and quality of the system's responses.

The authors evaluate ARAG on several conversational tasks, including open-domain dialogue and task-oriented dialogue. The results demonstrate that ARAG outperforms conventional retrieval-augmented generation approaches, highlighting the benefits of adaptive retrieval module selection.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for improving the performance of conversational systems through the use of retrieval-augmented generation. The key strength of ARAG is its ability to dynamically adapt the retrieval module to the current conversation context, allowing the system to leverage the most relevant external information.

One potential limitation of the research is the need for a comprehensive evaluation across a diverse set of conversational tasks and datasets. The authors have focused primarily on open-domain dialogue and task-oriented dialogue, and it would be valuable to assess the performance of ARAG in other conversational scenarios, such as multi-turn dialogues or specialized domains.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity and runtime performance of the ARAG framework. As conversational systems often operate in real-time environments, understanding the scalability and efficiency of the proposed approach would be important for practical deployment.

Conclusion

The adaptive retrieval-augmented generation (ARAG) approach presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of conversational systems. By dynamically selecting the most appropriate retrieval module based on the current context, ARAG demonstrates the ability to enhance the relevance, coherence, and quality of system responses.

The successful application of ARAG across multiple conversational tasks highlights its potential to improve the overall user experience and engagement in conversational systems. As the research in this area continues to evolve, further exploration of ARAG's scalability, efficiency, and generalization to diverse conversational scenarios would be valuable to fully unlock its potential.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Conversational Systems
Total Score

0

Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Conversational Systems

Xi Wang, Procheta Sen, Ruizhe Li, Emine Yilmaz

Despite the success of integrating large language models into the development of conversational systems, many studies have shown the effectiveness of retrieving and augmenting external knowledge for informative responses. Hence, many existing studies commonly assume the always need for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) in a conversational system without explicit control. This raises a research question about such a necessity. In this study, we propose to investigate the need for each turn of system response to be augmented with external knowledge. In particular, by leveraging human judgements on the binary choice of adaptive augmentation, we develop RAGate, a gating model, which models conversation context and relevant inputs to predict if a conversational system requires RAG for improved responses. We conduct extensive experiments on devising and applying RAGate to conversational models and well-rounded analyses of different conversational scenarios. Our experimental results and analysis indicate the effective application of RAGate in RAG-based conversational systems in identifying system responses for appropriate RAG with high-quality responses and a high generation confidence. This study also identifies the correlation between the generation's confidence level and the relevance of the augmented knowledge.

Read more

8/1/2024

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey
Total Score

0

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey

Shangyu Wu, Ying Xiong, Yufei Cui, Haolun Wu, Can Chen, Ye Yuan, Lianming Huang, Xue Liu, Tei-Wei Kuo, Nan Guan, Chun Jason Xue

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great success in various fields, benefiting from their huge amount of parameters that store knowledge. However, LLMs still suffer from several key issues, such as hallucination problems, knowledge update issues, and lacking domain-specific expertise. The appearance of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which leverages an external knowledge database to augment LLMs, makes up those drawbacks of LLMs. This paper reviews all significant techniques of RAG, especially in the retriever and the retrieval fusions. Besides, tutorial codes are provided for implementing the representative techniques in RAG. This paper further discusses the RAG training, including RAG with/without datastore update. Then, we introduce the application of RAG in representative natural language processing tasks and industrial scenarios. Finally, this paper discusses the future directions and challenges of RAG for promoting its development.

Read more

7/22/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey

Hao Yu, Aoran Gan, Kai Zhang, Shiwei Tong, Qi Liu, Zhaofeng Liu

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently gained traction in natural language processing. Numerous studies and real-world applications are leveraging its ability to enhance generative models through external information retrieval. Evaluating these RAG systems, however, poses unique challenges due to their hybrid structure and reliance on dynamic knowledge sources. To better understand these challenges, we conduct A Unified Evaluation Process of RAG (Auepora) and aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and benchmarks of RAG systems. Specifically, we examine and compare several quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation components, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness, within the current RAG benchmarks, encompassing the possible output and ground truth pairs. We then analyze the various datasets and metrics, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and suggest potential directions to advance the field of RAG benchmarks.

Read more

7/4/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

PersonaRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with User-Centric Agents

Saber Zerhoudi, Michael Granitzer

Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with generating reliable outputs due to outdated knowledge and hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models address this by enhancing LLMs with external knowledge, but often fail to personalize the retrieval process. This paper introduces PersonaRAG, a novel framework incorporating user-centric agents to adapt retrieval and generation based on real-time user data and interactions. Evaluated across various question answering datasets, PersonaRAG demonstrates superiority over baseline models, providing tailored answers to user needs. The results suggest promising directions for user-adapted information retrieval systems.

Read more

7/15/2024