Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
2405.07437
0
0
⛏️
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a pivotal innovation in natural language processing, enhancing generative models by incorporating external information retrieval. Evaluating RAG systems, however, poses distinct challenges due to their hybrid structure and reliance on dynamic knowledge sources. We consequently enhanced an extensive survey and proposed an analysis framework for benchmarks of RAG systems, RAGR (Retrieval, Generation, Additional Requirement), designed to systematically analyze RAG benchmarks by focusing on measurable outputs and established truths. Specifically, we scrutinize and contrast multiple quantifiable metrics of the Retrieval and Generation component, such as relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness, of the internal links within the current RAG evaluation methods, covering the possible output and ground truth pairs. We also analyze the integration of additional requirements of different works, discuss the limitations of current benchmarks, and propose potential directions for further research to address these shortcomings and advance the field of RAG evaluation. In conclusion, this paper collates the challenges associated with RAG evaluation. It presents a thorough analysis and examination of existing methodologies for RAG benchmark design based on the proposed RGAR framework.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a breakthrough in natural language processing that enhances generative models by incorporating external information retrieval.
- Evaluating RAG systems poses unique challenges due to their hybrid structure and reliance on dynamic knowledge sources.
- Researchers have proposed an analysis framework called RAGR (Retrieval, Generation, Additional Requirement) to systematically evaluate RAG benchmarks.
Plain English Explanation
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a new approach in natural language processing that aims to improve the performance of language models by combining them with information retrieval systems. This allows the models to draw upon external knowledge sources, rather than relying solely on the information they were trained on.
However, evaluating these RAG systems is a complex task. Because they are a hybrid of different components, it's not straightforward to measure their overall performance. The knowledge sources they use can also be constantly changing, which adds another layer of difficulty.
To address these challenges, researchers have developed a framework called RAGR (Retrieval, Generation, Additional Requirement). This framework provides a structured way to analyze the different aspects of RAG benchmarks, focusing on measurable outputs and established truths. The framework examines the quality of the retrieval component, the faithfulness of the generation component, and any additional requirements specific to different RAG systems.
By using this RAGR framework, researchers can more effectively evaluate and compare the performance of various RAG systems, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and suggest ways to improve the field of RAG evaluation.
Technical Explanation
The RAGR (Retrieval, Generation, Additional Requirement) framework was developed to systematically analyze benchmarks for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. RAG systems integrate information retrieval and language generation, which poses unique challenges for evaluation.
The RAGR framework focuses on three key aspects of RAG benchmarks:
- Retrieval: Evaluating the relevance, accuracy, and faithfulness of the information retrieved by the system.
- Generation: Assessing the quality, coherence, and faithfulness of the generated text.
- Additional Requirements: Analyzing any specific requirements or constraints imposed by different RAG systems, such as blending retrieval and generation or integrating with large language models.
By systematically examining these components, the RAGR framework provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating the performance of RAG systems and identifying areas for improvement.
Critical Analysis
The RAGR framework proposed in the paper addresses important challenges in evaluating RAG systems. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
- The framework focuses on measurable outputs and established truths, but it may not capture more subjective aspects of RAG system performance, such as user satisfaction or real-world applicability.
- The framework does not provide guidance on how to weight the different components (retrieval, generation, additional requirements) when assessing overall system performance.
- The paper does not explore the impact of dynamic knowledge sources on RAG system evaluation, which is a key challenge in this field.
Additionally, the researchers could have delved deeper into potential biases or fairness issues that may arise in RAG systems, as these are important considerations for real-world deployment.
Overall, the RAGR framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of RAG evaluation, but further research is needed to address these limitations and continue advancing the state of the art.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the challenges associated with evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. It introduces the RAGR (Retrieval, Generation, Additional Requirement) framework as a systematic approach to benchmarking RAG systems, focusing on measurable outputs and established truths.
By examining the retrieval, generation, and additional requirements components of RAG systems, the RAGR framework provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to assess the performance of these hybrid models. This can help identify areas for improvement and drive further advancements in the field of RAG.
As the use of RAG systems continues to grow, the insights and analysis presented in this paper will be crucial for ensuring the development of robust, reliable, and ethical natural language processing technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey
Penghao Zhao, Hailin Zhang, Qinhan Yu, Zhengren Wang, Yunteng Geng, Fangcheng Fu, Ling Yang, Wentao Zhang, Jie Jiang, Bin Cui
0
0
Advancements in model algorithms, the growth of foundational models, and access to high-quality datasets have propelled the evolution of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC). Despite its notable successes, AIGC still faces hurdles such as updating knowledge, handling long-tail data, mitigating data leakage, and managing high training and inference costs. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a paradigm to address such challenges. In particular, RAG introduces the information retrieval process, which enhances the generation process by retrieving relevant objects from available data stores, leading to higher accuracy and better robustness. In this paper, we comprehensively review existing efforts that integrate RAG technique into AIGC scenarios. We first classify RAG foundations according to how the retriever augments the generator, distilling the fundamental abstractions of the augmentation methodologies for various retrievers and generators. This unified perspective encompasses all RAG scenarios, illuminating advancements and pivotal technologies that help with potential future progress. We also summarize additional enhancements methods for RAG, facilitating effective engineering and implementation of RAG systems. Then from another view, we survey on practical applications of RAG across different modalities and tasks, offering valuable references for researchers and practitioners. Furthermore, we introduce the benchmarks for RAG, discuss the limitations of current RAG systems, and suggest potential directions for future research. Github: https://github.com/PKU-DAIR/RAG-Survey.
6/3/2024
🛸
Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Alireza Salemi, Hamed Zamani
0
0
Evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) presents challenges, particularly for retrieval models within these systems. Traditional end-to-end evaluation methods are computationally expensive. Furthermore, evaluation of the retrieval model's performance based on query-document relevance labels shows a small correlation with the RAG system's downstream performance. We propose a novel evaluation approach, eRAG, where each document in the retrieval list is individually utilized by the large language model within the RAG system. The output generated for each document is then evaluated based on the downstream task ground truth labels. In this manner, the downstream performance for each document serves as its relevance label. We employ various downstream task metrics to obtain document-level annotations and aggregate them using set-based or ranking metrics. Extensive experiments on a wide range of datasets demonstrate that eRAG achieves a higher correlation with downstream RAG performance compared to baseline methods, with improvements in Kendall's $tau$ correlation ranging from 0.168 to 0.494. Additionally, eRAG offers significant computational advantages, improving runtime and consuming up to 50 times less GPU memory than end-to-end evaluation.
4/23/2024
R^2AG: Incorporating Retrieval Information into Retrieval Augmented Generation
Fuda Ye, Shuangyin Li, Yongqi Zhang, Lei Chen
0
0
Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) has been applied in many scenarios to augment large language models (LLMs) with external documents provided by retrievers. However, a semantic gap exists between LLMs and retrievers due to differences in their training objectives and architectures. This misalignment forces LLMs to passively accept the documents provided by the retrievers, leading to incomprehension in the generation process, where the LLMs are burdened with the task of distinguishing these documents using their inherent knowledge. This paper proposes R$^2$AG, a novel enhanced RAG framework to fill this gap by incorporating Retrieval information into Retrieval Augmented Generation. Specifically, R$^2$AG utilizes the nuanced features from the retrievers and employs a R$^2$-Former to capture retrieval information. Then, a retrieval-aware prompting strategy is designed to integrate retrieval information into LLMs' generation. Notably, R$^2$AG suits low-source scenarios where LLMs and retrievers are frozen. Extensive experiments across five datasets validate the effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency of R$^2$AG. Our analysis reveals that retrieval information serves as an anchor to aid LLMs in the generation process, thereby filling the semantic gap.
6/21/2024
🛸
DuetRAG: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Dian Jiao, Li Cai, Jingsheng Huang, Wenqiao Zhang, Siliang Tang, Yueting Zhuang
0
0
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods augment the input of Large Language Models (LLMs) with relevant retrieved passages, reducing factual errors in knowledge-intensive tasks. However, contemporary RAG approaches suffer from irrelevant knowledge retrieval issues in complex domain questions (e.g., HotPot QA) due to the lack of corresponding domain knowledge, leading to low-quality generations. To address this issue, we propose a novel Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework, DuetRAG. Our bootstrapping philosophy is to simultaneously integrate the domain fintuning and RAG models to improve the knowledge retrieval quality, thereby enhancing generation quality. Finally, we demonstrate DuetRAG' s matches with expert human researchers on HotPot QA.
5/24/2024