Adaptive Soft Error Protection for Deep Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents an adaptive soft error protection approach for deep learning models
- Focuses on input difficulty-aware protection to optimize the use of error protection resources
- Includes a difficulty prediction module to estimate the difficulty of input samples and adaptively apply protective measures
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses an approach to make deep learning models more resilient to soft errors, which are unintended changes in the electrical signals within a computer system that can lead to incorrect outputs. Traditionally, error protection mechanisms are applied uniformly across all inputs, which can be inefficient. This paper proposes an adaptive soft error protection approach that tailors the protection based on the estimated difficulty of the input.
The key idea is to use a difficulty prediction module to assess how challenging each input is for the deep learning model. For easier inputs, less protection is needed, while more protection is applied for harder inputs. This input difficulty-aware protection helps optimize the use of limited error protection resources and improve the overall resilience of the deep learning system.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an adaptive soft error protection framework for deep learning models. The key components are:
-
Difficulty Prediction Module: This module is responsible for estimating the difficulty of each input sample. It takes the input and outputs a difficulty score, which represents how challenging the input is for the deep learning model.
-
Adaptive Protection Mechanism: Based on the difficulty score, the adaptive protection mechanism applies different levels of error protection to the model's computations. For easier inputs, less protection is used, while more protection is applied for harder inputs.
The authors evaluate their approach on various deep learning tasks and architectures, including image classification and language modeling. They demonstrate that the input difficulty-aware protection can significantly improve the resilience of the deep learning system while maintaining high accuracy, compared to uniform error protection schemes.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to adaptive soft error protection for deep learning models. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:
- The accuracy of the difficulty prediction module is crucial, and its performance may be influenced by the quality and diversity of the training data.
- The paper does not explore the impact of architectural modifications on the difficulty prediction and adaptive protection mechanisms.
- The proposed approach may have different trade-offs and performance characteristics across various deep learning tasks and architectures, which could be further investigated.
Overall, the paper offers a novel and practical solution to enhance the resilience of deep learning applications in the face of soft errors, and the ideas presented can inspire further research in this area.
Conclusion
The paper introduces an adaptive soft error protection approach for deep learning models that leverages a difficulty prediction module to optimize the use of error protection resources. By applying more protection to harder inputs and less protection to easier ones, the proposed framework can improve the resilience of deep learning systems without significant accuracy degradation. This work highlights the importance of input difficulty-aware protection and adaptive techniques in enhancing the reliability of deep learning applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Adaptive Soft Error Protection for Deep Learning
Xinghua Xue, Cheng Liu
The rising incidence of soft errors in hardware systems represents a considerable risk to the reliability of deep learning systems and can precipitate severe malfunctions. Although essential, soft error mitigation can impose substantial costs on deep learning systems that are inherently demanding in terms of computation and memory. Previous research has primarily explored variations in vulnerability among different components of computing engines or neural networks, aiming for selective protection to minimize protection overhead. Our approach diverges from these studies by recognizing that the susceptibility of deep learning tasks to soft errors is heavily input-dependent. Notably, some inputs are simpler for deep learning models and inherently exhibit greater tolerance to soft errors. Conversely, more complex inputs are prone to soft error impact. Based on these insights, we introduce an adaptive soft error protection strategy that tailors protection to the computational demands of individual inputs. To implement this strategy, we develop a metric for assessing the complexity of inputs and deploy a lightweight machine learning algorithm to gauge input difficulty. Subsequently, we employ robust protection for challenging inputs and minimal protection for simpler ones. Our experimental evaluation across diverse datasets and deep learning tasks reveals that our adaptive strategy reduces the soft error protection overhead by an average of 46.9%, without compromising system reliability.
Read more7/30/2024
0
Reinforcement Learning-based Adaptive Mitigation of Uncorrected DRAM Errors in the Field
Isaac Boixaderas, Sergi Mor'e, Javier Bartolome, David Vicente, Petar Radojkovi'c, Paul M. Carpenter, Eduard Ayguad'e
Scaling to larger systems, with current levels of reliability, requires cost-effective methods to mitigate hardware failures. One of the main causes of hardware failure is an uncorrected error in memory, which terminates the current job and wastes all computation since the last checkpoint. This paper presents the first adaptive method for triggering uncorrected error mitigation. It uses a prediction approach that considers the likelihood of an uncorrected error and its current potential cost. The method is based on reinforcement learning, and the only user-defined parameters are the mitigation cost and whether the job can be restarted from a mitigation point. We evaluate our method using classical machine learning metrics together with a cost-benefit analysis, which compares the cost of mitigation actions with the benefits from mitigating some of the errors. On two years of production logs from the MareNostrum supercomputer, our method reduces lost compute time by 54% compared with no mitigation and is just 6% below the optimal Oracle method. All source code is open source.
Read more7/24/2024
0
Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques
Cristiana Bolchini, Luca Cassano, Antonio Miele
Machine Learning (ML) is currently being exploited in numerous applications being one of the most effective Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, used in diverse fields, such as vision, autonomous systems, and alike. The trend motivated a significant amount of contributions to the analysis and design of ML applications against faults affecting the underlying hardware. The authors investigate the existing body of knowledge on Deep Learning (among ML techniques) resilience against hardware faults systematically through a thoughtful review in which the strengths and weaknesses of this literature stream are presented clearly and then future avenues of research are set out. The review is based on 220 scientific articles published between January 2019 and March 2024. The authors adopt a classifying framework to interpret and highlight research similarities and peculiarities, based on several parameters, starting from the main scope of the work, the adopted fault and error models, to their reproducibility. This framework allows for a comparison of the different solutions and the identification of possible synergies. Furthermore, suggestions concerning the future direction of research are proposed in the form of open challenges to be addressed.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Characterizing Soft-Error Resiliency in Arm's Ethos-U55 Embedded Machine Learning Accelerator
Abhishek Tyagi, Reiley Jeyapaul, Chuteng Zhu, Paul Whatmough, Yuhao Zhu
As Neural Processing Units (NPU) or accelerators are increasingly deployed in a variety of applications including safety critical applications such as autonomous vehicle, and medical imaging, it is critical to understand the fault-tolerance nature of the NPUs. We present a reliability study of Arm's Ethos-U55, an important industrial-scale NPU being utilised in embedded and IoT applications. We perform large scale RTL-level fault injections to characterize Ethos-U55 against the Automotive Safety Integrity Level D (ASIL-D) resiliency standard commonly used for safety-critical applications such as autonomous vehicles. We show that, under soft errors, all four configurations of the NPU fall short of the required level of resiliency for a variety of neural networks running on the NPU. We show that it is possible to meet the ASIL-D level resiliency without resorting to conventional strategies like Dual Core Lock Step (DCLS) that has an area overhead of 100%. We achieve so through selective protection, where hardware structures are selectively protected (e.g., duplicated, hardened) based on their sensitivity to soft errors and their silicon areas. To identify the optimal configuration that minimizes the area overhead while meeting the ASIL-D standard, the main challenge is the large search space associated with the time-consuming RTL simulation. To address this challenge, we present a statistical analysis tool that is validated against Arm silicon and that allows us to quickly navigate hundreds of billions of fault sites without exhaustive RTL fault injections. We show that by carefully duplicating a small fraction of the functional blocks and hardening the Flops in other blocks meets the ASIL-D safety standard while introducing an area overhead of only 38%.
Read more4/16/2024