Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer: Enhancing Robustness of RvS via Minimax Returns-to-go
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes the Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer (ARDT), which aims to enhance the robustness of Reinforcement from Demonstration (RfD) agents against adversarial attacks. -ARDT uses a minimax optimization approach to train the agent to maximize the worst-case return-to-go, which improves its robustness to corrupted observations during execution.
- Experiments on standard benchmarks show thatARDT outperforms existing baselines in terms of adversarial robustness without compromising nominal performance.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers developed a new model called the Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer (ARDT) to help reinforcement learning agents become more resilient to adversarial attacks. Adversarial attacks are when an AI system's inputs are intentionally altered in a way that causes the system to make mistakes.
ARDT works by training the agent to maximize the worst-case scenario of the expected future reward (called the "return-to-go") during its learning process. This means the agent learns to perform well even in the face of corrupted or adversarial observations, rather than just optimizing for the average case.
The researchers testedARDT on standard reinforcement learning benchmarks and found that it was able to outperform existing methods in terms of robustness to adversarial attacks without sacrificing the agent's normal performance.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer (ARDT), which is designed to enhance the robustness of Reinforcement from Demonstration (RfD) agents against adversarial attacks.
The key innovation ofARDT is its use of a minimax optimization approach to train the agent. Specifically, the agent is trained to maximize the worst-case return-to-go, where the "return-to-go" refers to the expected future reward. This encourages the agent to learn a policy that performs well even when faced with corrupted or adversarial observations during execution.
The paper evaluatesARDT on several reinforcement learning benchmarks and shows that it significantly outperforms existing baselines in terms of adversarial robustness, while maintaining competitive nominal performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation ofARDT and demonstrates its effectiveness in improving the robustness of RfD agents. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
- The paper focuses on offline reinforcement learning settings, and it is unclear how the approach would scale to more complex, online reinforcement learning problems.
- The paper only considers a specific type of adversarial attack (input corruption), and it would be valuable to evaluate the method's performance against other attack types, such as reward tampering or model-based attacks.
- The paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the computational overhead or training time requirements ofARDT compared to other methods, which could be an important practical consideration.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and promising approach to improving the robustness of reinforcement learning agents, but further research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.
Conclusion
The Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer (ARDT) proposed in this paper represents a significant step forward in enhancing the robustness of reinforcement learning agents to adversarial attacks. By training the agent to maximize the worst-case return-to-go,ARDT is able to improve the agent's performance in the face of corrupted or adversarial observations, without compromising its nominal performance.
The paper's experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, and the authors have identified several avenues for future research to further expand the capabilities and applicability ofARDT. As reinforcement learning continues to be applied in higher-stakes domains, the ability to build robust and reliable agents will become increasingly crucial, making theARDT a valuable contribution to the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer: Enhancing Robustness of RvS via Minimax Returns-to-go
Xiaohang Tang, Afonso Marques, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Ilija Bogunovic
Decision Transformer (DT), as one of the representative Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Learning (RvS) methods, has achieved strong performance in offline learning tasks by leveraging the powerful Transformer architecture for sequential decision-making. However, in adversarial environments, these methods can be non-robust, since the return is dependent on the strategies of both the decision-maker and adversary. Training a probabilistic model conditioned on observed return to predict action can fail to generalize, as the trajectories that achieve a return in the dataset might have done so due to a weak and suboptimal behavior adversary. To address this, we propose a worst-case-aware RvS algorithm, the Adversarial Robust Decision Transformer (ARDT), which learns and conditions the policy on in-sample minimax returns-to-go. ARDT aligns the target return with the worst-case return learned through minimax expectile regression, thereby enhancing robustness against powerful test-time adversaries. In experiments conducted on sequential games with full data coverage, ARDT can generate a maximin (Nash Equilibrium) strategy, the solution with the largest adversarial robustness. In large-scale sequential games and continuous adversarial RL environments with partial data coverage, ARDT demonstrates significantly superior robustness to powerful test-time adversaries and attains higher worst-case returns compared to contemporary DT methods.
Read more7/29/2024
🧪
0
Return-Aligned Decision Transformer
Tsunehiko Tanaka, Kenshi Abe, Kaito Ariu, Tetsuro Morimura, Edgar Simo-Serra
Traditional approaches in offline reinforcement learning aim to learn the optimal policy that maximizes the cumulative reward, also known as return. However, as applications broaden, it becomes increasingly crucial to train agents that not only maximize the returns, but align the actual return with a specified target return, giving control over the agent's performance. Decision Transformer (DT) optimizes a policy that generates actions conditioned on the target return through supervised learning and is equipped with a mechanism to control the agent using the target return. However, the action generation is hardly influenced by the target return because DT's self-attention allocates scarce attention scores to the return tokens. In this paper, we propose Return-Aligned Decision Transformer (RADT), designed to effectively align the actual return with the target return. RADT utilizes features extracted by paying attention solely to the return, enabling the action generation to consistently depend on the target return. Extensive experiments show that RADT reduces the discrepancies between the actual return and the target return of DT-based methods.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Robust Decision Transformer: Tackling Data Corruption in Offline RL via Sequence Modeling
Jiawei Xu, Rui Yang, Feng Luo, Meng Fang, Baoxiang Wang, Lei Han
Learning policies from offline datasets through offline reinforcement learning (RL) holds promise for scaling data-driven decision-making and avoiding unsafe and costly online interactions. However, real-world data collected from sensors or humans often contains noise and errors, posing a significant challenge for existing offline RL methods. Our study indicates that traditional offline RL methods based on temporal difference learning tend to underperform Decision Transformer (DT) under data corruption, especially when the amount of data is limited. This suggests the potential of sequential modeling for tackling data corruption in offline RL. To further unleash the potential of sequence modeling methods, we propose Robust Decision Transformer (RDT) by incorporating several robust techniques. Specifically, we introduce Gaussian weighted learning and iterative data correction to reduce the effect of corrupted data. Additionally, we leverage embedding dropout to enhance the model's resistance to erroneous inputs. Extensive experiments on MoJoCo, KitChen, and Adroit tasks demonstrate RDT's superior performance under diverse data corruption compared to previous methods. Moreover, RDT exhibits remarkable robustness in a challenging setting that combines training-time data corruption with testing-time observation perturbations. These results highlight the potential of robust sequence modeling for learning from noisy or corrupted offline datasets, thereby promoting the reliable application of offline RL in real-world tasks.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Robust Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Adversarial Auxiliary Model
Siemen Herremans, Ali Anwar, Siegfried Mercelis
Reinforcement learning has demonstrated impressive performance in various challenging problems such as robotics, board games, and classical arcade games. However, its real-world applications can be hindered by the absence of robustness and safety in the learned policies. More specifically, an RL agent that trains in a certain Markov decision process (MDP) often struggles to perform well in nearly identical MDPs. To address this issue, we employ the framework of Robust MDPs (RMDPs) in a model-based setting and introduce a novel learned transition model. Our method specifically incorporates an auxiliary pessimistic model, updated adversarially, to estimate the worst-case MDP within a Kullback-Leibler uncertainty set. In comparison to several existing works, our work does not impose any additional conditions on the training environment, such as the need for a parametric simulator. To test the effectiveness of the proposed pessimistic model in enhancing policy robustness, we integrate it into a practical RL algorithm, called Robust Model-Based Policy Optimization (RMBPO). Our experimental results indicate a notable improvement in policy robustness on high-dimensional MuJoCo control tasks, with the auxiliary model enhancing the performance of the learned policy in distorted MDPs. We further explore the learned deviation between the proposed auxiliary world model and the nominal model, to examine how pessimism is achieved. By learning a pessimistic world model and demonstrating its role in improving policy robustness, our research contributes towards making (model-based) RL more robust.
Read more7/2/2024