Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers

Read original: arXiv:2405.10360 - Published 5/20/2024 by Neil Dowling, Maxwell T. West, Angus Southwell, Azar C. Nakhl, Martin Sevior, Muhammad Usman, Kavan Modi
Total Score

0

Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers, which are machine learning models that use quantum mechanical principles for classification tasks.
  • The researchers investigate the ability of quantum classifiers to withstand adversarial attacks, where an adversary introduces small, carefully crafted perturbations to the input data to cause the model to make incorrect predictions.
  • The paper provides theoretical guarantees and empirical evidence for the increased adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers compared to their classical counterparts.

Plain English Explanation

Quantum classifiers are a type of machine learning model that take advantage of quantum mechanical principles to perform classification tasks, such as identifying objects in images or categorizing text. This paper looks at how well these quantum classifiers can withstand adversarial attacks, where someone intentionally tries to trick the model into making mistakes by making tiny changes to the input data.

The researchers show that quantum classifiers are generally more resistant to these adversarial attacks compared to traditional, classical machine learning models. This means that it's harder for someone to fool a quantum classifier by making small, sneaky changes to the data. The paper provides both theoretical proofs and experimental evidence to support this finding.

Understanding the adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers is important as these models become more widely used, especially in sensitive applications like medical diagnosis or financial fraud detection, where it's crucial that the models make reliable and trustworthy predictions. The increased resilience of quantum classifiers to adversarial attacks could make them a more secure and dependable choice in these high-stakes scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by introducing the concept of adversarial robustness in the context of quantum machine learning. The researchers then provide a formal definition of adversarial robustness for quantum classifiers and derive theoretical bounds on the adversarial perturbations required to fool such models.

Specifically, the authors show that the adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers scales favorably with the system size, meaning that larger quantum systems are more resistant to adversarial attacks. This is in contrast to classical machine learning models, where adversarial robustness tends to degrade as the model complexity increases.

The theoretical analysis is supported by numerical experiments, where the researchers compare the adversarial robustness of quantum and classical classifiers on several benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that quantum classifiers consistently outperform their classical counterparts in terms of adversarial robustness, with the performance gap widening as the system size increases.

The researchers attribute the enhanced adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers to the inherent properties of quantum mechanics, such as the exponential scaling of the Hilbert space and the sensitivity of quantum states to perturbations.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical and empirical foundation for the improved adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers. However, it's important to note that the analysis is limited to a specific class of quantum classifiers and may not extend to all quantum machine learning models.

Additionally, the paper does not address the practical challenges of implementing and training robust quantum classifiers, such as the resource requirements and the sensitivity to noise and errors in quantum hardware.

Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of these findings to a wider range of quantum machine learning architectures and to investigate the privacy advantages that quantum classifiers may offer compared to classical models.

Conclusion

This paper provides a compelling case for the enhanced adversarial robustness of quantum classifiers compared to classical machine learning models. The theoretical guarantees and empirical results suggest that quantum classifiers could be a more secure and reliable choice for applications where model reliability and resilience to adversarial attacks are critical.

As quantum computing continues to advance and quantum machine learning becomes more practical, the insights from this paper could help guide the development of robust and secure quantum-based classification systems with broad real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers
Total Score

0

Adversarial Robustness Guarantees for Quantum Classifiers

Neil Dowling, Maxwell T. West, Angus Southwell, Azar C. Nakhl, Martin Sevior, Muhammad Usman, Kavan Modi

Despite their ever more widespread deployment throughout society, machine learning algorithms remain critically vulnerable to being spoofed by subtle adversarial tampering with their input data. The prospect of near-term quantum computers being capable of running {quantum machine learning} (QML) algorithms has therefore generated intense interest in their adversarial vulnerability. Here we show that quantum properties of QML algorithms can confer fundamental protections against such attacks, in certain scenarios guaranteeing robustness against classically-armed adversaries. We leverage tools from many-body physics to identify the quantum sources of this protection. Our results offer a theoretical underpinning of recent evidence which suggest quantum advantages in the search for adversarial robustness. In particular, we prove that quantum classifiers are: (i) protected against weak perturbations of data drawn from the trained distribution, (ii) protected against local attacks if they are insufficiently scrambling, and (iii) protected against universal adversarial attacks if they are sufficiently quantum chaotic. Our analytic results are supported by numerical evidence demonstrating the applicability of our theorems and the resulting robustness of a quantum classifier in practice. This line of inquiry constitutes a concrete pathway to advantage in QML, orthogonal to the usually sought improvements in model speed or accuracy.

Read more

5/20/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

A Comparative Analysis of Adversarial Robustness for Quantum and Classical Machine Learning Models

Maximilian Wendlinger, Kilian Tscharke, Pascal Debus

Quantum machine learning (QML) continues to be an area of tremendous interest from research and industry. While QML models have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks much in the same manner as classical machine learning models, it is still largely unknown how to compare adversarial attacks on quantum versus classical models. In this paper, we show how to systematically investigate the similarities and differences in adversarial robustness of classical and quantum models using transfer attacks, perturbation patterns and Lipschitz bounds. More specifically, we focus on classification tasks on a handcrafted dataset that allows quantitative analysis for feature attribution. This enables us to get insight, both theoretically and experimentally, on the robustness of classification networks. We start by comparing typical QML model architectures such as amplitude and re-upload encoding circuits with variational parameters to a classical ConvNet architecture. Next, we introduce a classical approximation of QML circuits (originally obtained with Random Fourier Features sampling but adapted in this work to fit a trainable encoding) and evaluate this model, denoted Fourier network, in comparison to other architectures. Our findings show that this Fourier network can be seen as a middle ground on the quantum-classical boundary. While adversarial attacks successfully transfer across this boundary in both directions, we also show that regularization helps quantum networks to be more robust, which has direct impact on Lipschitz bounds and transfer attacks.

Read more

4/26/2024

Quantum Adversarial Learning for Kernel Methods
Total Score

0

Quantum Adversarial Learning for Kernel Methods

Giuseppe Montalbano, Leonardo Banchi

We show that hybrid quantum classifiers based on quantum kernel methods and support vector machines are vulnerable against adversarial attacks, namely small engineered perturbations of the input data can deceive the classifier into predicting the wrong result. Nonetheless, we also show that simple defence strategies based on data augmentation with a few crafted perturbations can make the classifier robust against new attacks. Our results find applications in security-critical learning problems and in mitigating the effect of some forms of quantum noise, since the attacker can also be understood as part of the surrounding environment.

Read more

4/10/2024

Certifiably Robust Encoding Schemes
Total Score

0

Certifiably Robust Encoding Schemes

Aman Saxena, Tom Wollschlager, Nicola Franco, Jeanette Miriam Lorenz, Stephan Gunnemann

Quantum machine learning uses principles from quantum mechanics to process data, offering potential advances in speed and performance. However, previous work has shown that these models are susceptible to attacks that manipulate input data or exploit noise in quantum circuits. Following this, various studies have explored the robustness of these models. These works focus on the robustness certification of manipulations of the quantum states. We extend this line of research by investigating the robustness against perturbations in the classical data for a general class of data encoding schemes. We show that for such schemes, the addition of suitable noise channels is equivalent to evaluating the mean value of the noiseless classifier at the smoothed data, akin to Randomized Smoothing from classical machine learning. Using our general framework, we show that suitable additions of phase-damping noise channels improve empirical and provable robustness for the considered class of encoding schemes.

Read more

8/6/2024