AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents

Read original: arXiv:2408.08089 - Published 8/16/2024 by Guhong Chen, Liyang Fan, Zihan Gong, Nan Xie, Zixuan Li, Ziqiang Liu, Chengming Li, Qiang Qu, Shiwen Ni, Min Yang
Total Score

0

AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a simulation system called AgentCourt that models a court environment with adversarial lawyer agents.
  • The lawyers in this system are evolvable agents that can adapt and improve their strategies over time.
  • The goal is to study the dynamics of the legal system and how different lawyer strategies and behaviors impact the court process and outcomes.

Plain English Explanation

AgentCourt is a simulation tool that creates a virtual court system with artificial intelligence (AI) lawyers. These lawyer agents are designed to compete against each other, much like real lawyers do in a courtroom.

The key innovation is that the lawyer agents can evolve and adapt their strategies over time. As they engage in simulated court cases, they learn and improve their tactics, just as human lawyers do through experience.

By observing how these AI lawyers interact and how the court proceedings unfold, the researchers aim to gain insights into the dynamics of the legal system. They can study things like how different lawyering styles and strategies impact the outcomes, and how the system as a whole behaves over time.

This type of simulation allows the researchers to explore the legal domain in a controlled and flexible environment, without the constraints of the real world. It's a way to experiment with and better understand the complex interactions that shape the legal process.

Technical Explanation

The core of the AgentCourt system is the evolvable lawyer agents that engage in simulated court cases. These agents are designed with neural networks that allow them to learn and adapt their strategies over the course of multiple trials.

The agents compete against each other in a virtual courtroom setting, presenting arguments, cross-examining witnesses, and attempting to persuade the judge or jury. Their performance is evaluated based on factors like trial outcomes, persuasiveness, and adherence to legal principles.

As the agents accumulate experience, they are able to evolve their strategies, adjusting their tactics, decision-making processes, and underlying knowledge. This evolutionary process is guided by a genetic algorithm that selects for the most successful agent behaviors.

The researchers can then analyze the resulting dynamics of the court system, looking at things like the emergence of dominant strategies, the impact of different agent characteristics, and the overall stability and fairness of the simulated legal proceedings.

Critical Analysis

The AgentCourt system provides a novel and flexible approach to studying the legal domain, but it also has some limitations and potential issues to consider:

  • The simulation is necessarily a simplification of the real-world legal system, and may not capture all the nuances and complexities of actual court proceedings.
  • The evolution of the lawyer agents is guided by a specific algorithm, which could introduce biases or skew the results in certain directions.
  • The evaluation criteria used to judge the agents' performance may not fully reflect the multifaceted nature of effective lawyering, which involves factors beyond just trial outcomes.
  • The study of the system's dynamics and emergent behaviors relies on the specific implementation and parameterization of the simulation, which could limit the generalizability of the findings.

Additionally, there are ethical considerations around the use of AI in the legal domain, such as concerns about algorithmic bias, transparency, and accountability. The researchers would need to carefully address these issues to ensure the responsible development and deployment of such systems.

Conclusion

The AgentCourt simulation system represents an innovative approach to studying the legal domain by modeling it as a multi-agent system with evolvable lawyer agents. This allows researchers to explore the dynamics and emergent behaviors of the legal system in a controlled and flexible environment.

While the system has limitations and potential issues to address, it offers a promising avenue for gaining insights into the complex interactions and strategies that shape the legal process. By better understanding these dynamics, the researchers hope to inform the development of more effective and equitable legal systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents
Total Score

0

AgentCourt: Simulating Court with Adversarial Evolvable Lawyer Agents

Guhong Chen, Liyang Fan, Zihan Gong, Nan Xie, Zixuan Li, Ziqiang Liu, Chengming Li, Qiang Qu, Shiwen Ni, Min Yang

In this paper, we present a simulation system called AgentCourt that simulates the entire courtroom process. The judge, plaintiff's lawyer, defense lawyer, and other participants are autonomous agents driven by large language models (LLMs). Our core goal is to enable lawyer agents to learn how to argue a case, as well as improving their overall legal skills, through courtroom process simulation. To achieve this goal, we propose an adversarial evolutionary approach for the lawyer-agent. Since AgentCourt can simulate the occurrence and development of court hearings based on a knowledge base and LLM, the lawyer agents can continuously learn and accumulate experience from real court cases. The simulation experiments show that after two lawyer-agents have engaged in a thousand adversarial legal cases in AgentCourt (which can take a decade for real-world lawyers), compared to their pre-evolutionary state, the evolved lawyer agents exhibit consistent improvement in their ability to handle legal tasks. To enhance the credibility of our experimental results, we enlisted a panel of professional lawyers to evaluate our simulations. The evaluation indicates that the evolved lawyer agents exhibit notable advancements in responsiveness, as well as expertise and logical rigor. This work paves the way for advancing LLM-driven agent technology in legal scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/relic-yuexi/AgentCourt.

Read more

8/16/2024

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation
Total Score

0

AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation

Zhitao He, Pengfei Cao, Chenhao Wang, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen, Jiexin Xu, Huaijun Li, Xiaojian Jiang, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao

With the development of deep learning, natural language processing technology has effectively improved the efficiency of various aspects of the traditional judicial industry. However, most current efforts focus on tasks within individual judicial stages, making it difficult to handle complex tasks that span multiple stages. As the autonomous agents powered by large language models are becoming increasingly smart and able to make complex decisions in real-world settings, offering new insights for judicial intelligence. In this paper, (1) we propose a novel multi-agent framework, AgentsCourt, for judicial decision-making. Our framework follows the classic court trial process, consisting of court debate simulation, legal resources retrieval and decision-making refinement to simulate the decision-making of judge. (2) we introduce SimuCourt, a judicial benchmark that encompasses 420 Chinese judgment documents, spanning the three most common types of judicial cases. Furthermore, to support this task, we construct a large-scale legal knowledge base, Legal-KB, with multi-resource legal knowledge. (3) Extensive experiments show that our framework outperforms the existing advanced methods in various aspects, especially in generating legal articles, where our model achieves significant improvements of 8.6% and 9.1% F1 score in the first and second instance settings, respectively.

Read more

9/24/2024

Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Legal Assistant with Knowledge Graph Enhanced Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Model
Total Score

0

Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Legal Assistant with Knowledge Graph Enhanced Mixture-of-Experts Large Language Model

Jiaxi Cui, Munan Ning, Zongjian Li, Bohua Chen, Yang Yan, Hao Li, Bin Ling, Yonghong Tian, Li Yuan

AI legal assistants based on Large Language Models (LLMs) can provide accessible legal consulting services, but the hallucination problem poses potential legal risks. This paper presents Chatlaw, an innovative legal assistant utilizing a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model and a multi-agent system to enhance the reliability and accuracy of AI-driven legal services. By integrating knowledge graphs with artificial screening, we construct a high-quality legal dataset to train the MoE model. This model utilizes different experts to address various legal issues, optimizing the accuracy of legal responses. Additionally, Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP), modeled after real law firm workflows, significantly reduce errors and hallucinations in legal services. Our MoE model outperforms GPT-4 in the Lawbench and Unified Qualification Exam for Legal Professionals by 7.73% in accuracy and 11 points, respectively, and also surpasses other models in multiple dimensions during real-case consultations, demonstrating our robust capability for legal consultation.

Read more

5/31/2024

Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents
Total Score

0

Experiential Co-Learning of Software-Developing Agents

Chen Qian, Yufan Dang, Jiahao Li, Wei Liu, Zihao Xie, Yifei Wang, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, Xin Cong, Xiaoyin Che, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have brought significant changes to various domains, especially through LLM-driven autonomous agents. A representative scenario is in software development, where LLM agents demonstrate efficient collaboration, task division, and assurance of software quality, markedly reducing the need for manual involvement. However, these agents frequently perform a variety of tasks independently, without benefiting from past experiences, which leads to repeated mistakes and inefficient attempts in multi-step task execution. To this end, we introduce Experiential Co-Learning, a novel LLM-agent learning framework in which instructor and assistant agents gather shortcut-oriented experiences from their historical trajectories and use these past experiences for future task execution. The extensive experiments demonstrate that the framework enables agents to tackle unseen software-developing tasks more effectively. We anticipate that our insights will guide LLM agents towards enhanced autonomy and contribute to their evolutionary growth in cooperative learning. The code and data are available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/ChatDev.

Read more

6/6/2024