AGS-GNN: Attribute-guided Sampling for Graph Neural Networks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces AGS-GNN, a new approach for sampling nodes in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that leverages node attributes to improve performance on graphs with heterophily (where connected nodes tend to have dissimilar attributes).
- The key idea is to use submodular functions to guide the node sampling process, which can efficiently capture both structural and attribute information.
- Experiments show that AGS-GNN outperforms existing GNN models on a variety of benchmark datasets with varying degrees of homophily and heterophily.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a powerful tool for analyzing and making predictions on graph-structured data, such as social networks or biological pathways. Traditional GNN models work well when the graph exhibits homophily - where connected nodes tend to have similar attributes. However, they can struggle on graphs with heterophily, where connected nodes have dissimilar attributes.
The AGS-GNN model introduced in this paper aims to address this challenge. The key idea is to use the node attributes to guide the process of selecting which nodes to include when training the GNN model. By smartly choosing which nodes to focus on, AGS-GNN can better capture both the structural and attribute-based relationships in the graph, leading to improved performance on heterophilic graphs.
The researchers use a mathematical concept called submodular functions to efficiently guide this node sampling process. Submodular functions have the property that adding a new element to a small set tends to provide a bigger improvement than adding it to a large set. This aligns well with the intuition that focusing on a carefully selected subset of nodes can be more informative than randomly sampling nodes.
Through experiments on various benchmark datasets, the authors show that AGS-GNN outperforms existing GNN models, especially on graphs with significant heterophily. This suggests that the attribute-guided sampling approach is an effective way to make GNNs more robust and adaptable to different types of graph structures.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of this paper is the AGS-GNN model, which uses submodular functions to guide the node sampling process in Graph Neural Networks.
Formally, the authors consider a graph G = (V, E) with a set of nodes V and edges E, along with node attributes X. The goal is to learn a node classification task, where each node has a label y.
Traditional GNN models like GCN and GraphSAGE rely on a fixed, uniform sampling of neighboring nodes during the message passing process. In contrast, AGS-GNN uses an attribute-guided sampling (AGS) approach to dynamically select the most informative subset of nodes to include.
The key idea is to define a submodular function f(S) that measures the "informativeness" of a set of nodes S. This function captures both the structural properties (connectivity) and attribute similarity of the nodes in S. By maximizing this submodular function, AGS-GNN can efficiently identify the most relevant nodes to include in the message passing step.
The authors propose two specific submodular functions to use in AGS-GNN:
- Facility Location function: Measures the overall similarity between the selected nodes and their unselected neighbors.
- Graph Cut function: Measures the connectivity and attribute dissimilarity between the selected and unselected nodes.
These submodular functions are then used within a greedy optimization algorithm to iteratively select the most informative nodes for the GNN model.
Experiments on a variety of benchmark datasets show that AGS-GNN consistently outperforms standard GNN models, especially on graphs with significant heterophily. The authors attribute this success to the ability of the attribute-guided sampling approach to better capture both structural and attribute-based relationships in the graph.
Critical Analysis
The AGS-GNN model presents a promising approach for making GNNs more robust to heterophilic graph structures. The use of submodular functions to guide the node sampling process is a clever and theoretically-grounded idea that aligns well with the intuition that focusing on a carefully selected subset of nodes can be more informative than random sampling.
However, the paper does not extensively explore the limitations or potential drawbacks of the AGS-GNN approach. For example, the computational complexity of the submodular optimization procedure is not discussed, which could be a practical concern for large-scale graphs. Additionally, the authors do not investigate how the performance of AGS-GNN might scale with the size and complexity of the input graph.
It would also be interesting to see a more detailed analysis of the types of graphs and tasks where AGS-GNN provides the greatest performance improvements over standard GNN models. Understanding the specific graph characteristics and node/edge properties that play a role in the success of AGS-GNN could provide valuable insights for future research.
Overall, the AGS-GNN model represents an important step towards making GNNs more adaptable and effective on a wider range of graph-structured data. Further exploration of its limitations and potential extensions could lead to even more robust and versatile graph representation learning techniques.
Conclusion
The AGS-GNN model introduced in this paper offers a novel approach for improving the performance of Graph Neural Networks on graphs with heterophilic structures. By using submodular functions to guide the node sampling process, AGS-GNN is able to capture both structural and attribute-based relationships in the graph, leading to superior results compared to standard GNN models.
The key contribution of this work is the clever use of submodular optimization to efficiently identify the most informative subset of nodes to include in the GNN training process. This attribute-guided sampling strategy represents an important step towards making GNNs more adaptable and robust to a wider range of graph characteristics.
While the paper does not extensively explore the limitations of the AGS-GNN approach, the promising results on benchmark datasets suggest that this line of research could have significant implications for real-world applications of graph representation learning, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and biological network modeling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
AGS-GNN: Attribute-guided Sampling for Graph Neural Networks
Siddhartha Shankar Das, S M Ferdous, Mahantesh M Halappanavar, Edoardo Serra, Alex Pothen
We propose AGS-GNN, a novel attribute-guided sampling algorithm for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that exploits node features and connectivity structure of a graph while simultaneously adapting for both homophily and heterophily in graphs. (In homophilic graphs vertices of the same class are more likely to be connected, and vertices of different classes tend to be linked in heterophilic graphs.) While GNNs have been successfully applied to homophilic graphs, their application to heterophilic graphs remains challenging. The best-performing GNNs for heterophilic graphs do not fit the sampling paradigm, suffer high computational costs, and are not inductive. We employ samplers based on feature-similarity and feature-diversity to select subsets of neighbors for a node, and adaptively capture information from homophilic and heterophilic neighborhoods using dual channels. Currently, AGS-GNN is the only algorithm that we know of that explicitly controls homophily in the sampled subgraph through similar and diverse neighborhood samples. For diverse neighborhood sampling, we employ submodularity, which was not used in this context prior to our work. The sampling distribution is pre-computed and highly parallel, achieving the desired scalability. Using an extensive dataset consisting of 35 small ($le$ 100K nodes) and large (>100K nodes) homophilic and heterophilic graphs, we demonstrate the superiority of AGS-GNN compare to the current approaches in the literature. AGS-GNN achieves comparable test accuracy to the best-performing heterophilic GNNs, even outperforming methods using the entire graph for node classification. AGS-GNN also converges faster compared to methods that sample neighborhoods randomly, and can be incorporated into existing GNN models that employ node or graph sampling.
Read more5/27/2024
🔗
0
Restructuring Graph for Higher Homophily via Adaptive Spectral Clustering
Shouheng Li, Dongwoo Kim, Qing Wang
While a growing body of literature has been studying new Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that work on both homophilic and heterophilic graphs, little has been done on adapting classical GNNs to less-homophilic graphs. Although the ability to handle less-homophilic graphs is restricted, classical GNNs still stand out in several nice properties such as efficiency, simplicity, and explainability. In this work, we propose a novel graph restructuring method that can be integrated into any type of GNNs, including classical GNNs, to leverage the benefits of existing GNNs while alleviating their limitations. Our contribution is threefold: a) learning the weight of pseudo-eigenvectors for an adaptive spectral clustering that aligns well with known node labels, b) proposing a new density-aware homophilic metric that is robust to label imbalance, and c) reconstructing the adjacency matrix based on the result of adaptive spectral clustering to maximize the homophilic scores. The experimental results show that our graph restructuring method can significantly boost the performance of six classical GNNs by an average of 25% on less-homophilic graphs. The boosted performance is comparable to state-of-the-art methods.
Read more4/30/2024
0
Heterophilous Distribution Propagation for Graph Neural Networks
Zhuonan Zheng, Sheng Zhou, Hongjia Xu, Ming Gu, Yilun Xu, Ao Li, Yuhong Li, Jingjun Gu, Jiajun Bu
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable success in various graph mining tasks by aggregating information from neighborhoods for representation learning. The success relies on the homophily assumption that nearby nodes exhibit similar behaviors, while it may be violated in many real-world graphs. Recently, heterophilous graph neural networks (HeterGNNs) have attracted increasing attention by modifying the neural message passing schema for heterophilous neighborhoods. However, they suffer from insufficient neighborhood partition and heterophily modeling, both of which are critical but challenging to break through. To tackle these challenges, in this paper, we propose heterophilous distribution propagation (HDP) for graph neural networks. Instead of aggregating information from all neighborhoods, HDP adaptively separates the neighbors into homophilous and heterphilous parts based on the pseudo assignments during training. The heterophilous neighborhood distribution is learned with orthogonality-oriented constraint via a trusted prototype contrastive learning paradigm. Both the homophilous and heterophilous patterns are propagated with a novel semantic-aware message passing mechanism. We conduct extensive experiments on 9 benchmark datasets with different levels of homophily. Experimental results show that our method outperforms representative baselines on heterophilous datasets.
Read more6/3/2024
🧠
0
Incorporating Heterophily into Graph Neural Networks for Graph Classification
Jiayi Yang, Sourav Medya, Wei Ye
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) often assume strong homophily for graph classification, seldom considering heterophily, which means connected nodes tend to have different class labels and dissimilar features. In real-world scenarios, graphs may have nodes that exhibit both homophily and heterophily. Failing to generalize to this setting makes many GNNs underperform in graph classification. In this paper, we address this limitation by identifying three effective designs and develop a novel GNN architecture called IHGNN (short for Incorporating Heterophily into Graph Neural Networks). These designs include the combination of integration and separation of the ego- and neighbor-embeddings of nodes, adaptive aggregation of node embeddings from different layers, and differentiation between different node embeddings for constructing the graph-level readout function. We empirically validate IHGNN on various graph datasets and demonstrate that it outperforms the state-of-the-art GNNs for graph classification.
Read more5/10/2024