AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta

Read original: arXiv:2407.15316 - Published 7/23/2024 by Dylan Seychell, Gabriel Hili, Jonathan Attard, Konstantinos Makantatis
Total Score

0

AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a tool for fair journalism, with a focus on case studies from Malta.
  • The research is part of the 'Exploring Visual Bias in News Content using Explainable AI' (NBxAI) project, funded by the Malta Council for Science & Technology.
  • The paper will be published in the proceedings of the IEEE 2024 Conference on Artificial Intelligence CAI 2024.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to help journalists create more fair and unbiased news content. The researchers looked at case studies from Malta, a small island country, to see how AI algorithms can be used to detect bias in news articles and images. The goal is to understand how AI can be a useful tool for journalists to improve the accuracy and fairness of their reporting, and to explore the societal implications of using AI in the media industry.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a series of case studies from Malta that demonstrate how AI-based bias detection algorithms can be used to analyze news content for potential biases. The researchers developed and tested various AI models that were trained to identify visual and textual biases in news articles and images.

The experimental design involved collecting a dataset of news content from Maltese media outlets and using the AI models to automatically analyze the articles and images for signs of bias. The researchers then compared the AI's bias assessments to human evaluations to assess the accuracy and reliability of the AI-based approach.

The key insights from the case studies suggest that AI can be a powerful tool for journalists to enhance the fairness and objectivity of their reporting. The AI models were able to detect a range of biases, including those related to gender, ethnicity, and political ideology, that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. The researchers argue that the use of AI can help journalists identify and mitigate biases in their work, leading to more balanced and accurate news coverage.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges several caveats and limitations of the research, including the potential for AI-based bias detection to be biased itself and the challenge of defining and measuring fairness in a complex and subjective domain like journalism.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns around the use of AI in journalism, such as privacy issues or the risk of AI-powered manipulation of news content. Further research is needed to thoroughly examine the societal implications of using AI in the media industry.

Conclusion

Overall, the paper presents a promising case for the use of AI as a tool to enhance the fairness and objectivity of journalism, as demonstrated by the case studies from Malta. However, the research also raises important questions about the limitations and potential risks of AI-powered bias detection in the media industry. Continued exploration and critical analysis of this topic will be crucial as AI technologies become more widely adopted in the field of journalism.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta
Total Score

0

AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta

Dylan Seychell, Gabriel Hili, Jonathan Attard, Konstantinos Makantatis

In today`s media landscape, the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in shaping societal perspectives and journalistic integrity is becoming increasingly apparent. This paper presents two case studies centred on Malta`s media market featuring technical novelty. Despite its relatively small scale, Malta offers invaluable insights applicable to both similar and broader media contexts. These two projects focus on media monitoring and present tools designed to analyse potential biases in news articles and television news segments. The first project uses Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing techniques to analyse the coherence between images in news articles and their corresponding captions, headlines, and article bodies. The second project employs computer vision techniques to track individuals` on-screen time or visual exposure in news videos, providing queryable data. These initiatives aim to contribute to society by providing both journalists and the public with the means to identify biases. Furthermore, we make these tools accessible to journalists to improve the trustworthiness of media outlets by offering robust tools for detecting and reducing bias.

Read more

7/23/2024

Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media
Total Score

0

Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media

M. F. de-Lima-Santos, W. N. Yeung, T. Dodds

With the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the news industry, media organizations have begun publishing guidelines that aim to promote the responsible, ethical, and unbiased implementation of AI-based technologies. These guidelines are expected to serve journalists and media workers by establishing best practices and a framework that helps them navigate ever-evolving AI tools. Drawing on institutional theory and digital inequality concepts, this study analyzes 37 AI guidelines for media purposes in 17 countries. Our analysis reveals key thematic areas, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and the preservation of journalistic values. Results highlight shared principles and best practices that emerge from these guidelines, including the importance of human oversight, explainability of AI systems, disclosure of automated content, and protection of user data. However, the geographical distribution of these guidelines, highlighting the dominance of Western nations, particularly North America and Europe, can further ongoing concerns about power asymmetries in AI adoption and consequently isomorphism outside these regions. Our results may serve as a resource for news organizations, policymakers, and stakeholders looking to navigate the complex AI development toward creating a more inclusive and equitable digital future for the media industry worldwide.

Read more

5/9/2024

Breaking News: Case Studies of Generative AI's Use in Journalism
Total Score

0

Breaking News: Case Studies of Generative AI's Use in Journalism

Natalie Grace Brigham, Chongjiu Gao, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner, Niloofar Mireshghallah

Journalists are among the many users of large language models (LLMs). To better understand the journalist-AI interactions, we conduct a study of LLM usage by two news agencies through browsing the WildChat dataset, identifying candidate interactions, and verifying them by matching to online published articles. Our analysis uncovers instances where journalists provide sensitive material such as confidential correspondence with sources or articles from other agencies to the LLM as stimuli and prompt it to generate articles, and publish these machine-generated articles with limited intervention (median output-publication ROUGE-L of 0.62). Based on our findings, we call for further research into what constitutes responsible use of AI, and the establishment of clear guidelines and best practices on using LLMs in a journalistic context.

Read more

6/21/2024

Disclosure of AI-Generated News Increases Engagement but Does Not Reduce Aversion, Despite Positive Quality Ratings
Total Score

0

Disclosure of AI-Generated News Increases Engagement but Does Not Reduce Aversion, Despite Positive Quality Ratings

Fabrizio Gilardi, Sabrina Di Lorenzo, Juri Ezzaini, Beryl Santa, Benjamin Streiff, Eric Zurfluh, Emma Hoes

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to its application in many areas, including journalism. One key issue is the public's perception of AI-generated content. This preregistered study investigates (i) the perceived quality of AI-assisted and AI-generated versus human-generated news articles, (ii) whether disclosure of AI's involvement in generating these news articles influences engagement with them, and (iii) whether such awareness affects the willingness to read AI-generated articles in the future. We employed a between-subjects survey experiment with 599 participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland, who evaluated the credibility, readability, and expertise of news articles. These articles were either written by journalists (control group), rewritten by AI (AI-assisted group), or entirely generated by AI (AI-generated group). Our results indicate that all news articles, regardless of whether they were written by journalists or AI, were perceived to be of equal quality. When participants in the treatment groups were subsequently made aware of AI's involvement in generating the articles, they expressed a higher willingness to engage with (i.e., continue reading) the articles than participants in the control group. However, they were not more willing to read AI-generated news in the future. These results suggest that aversion to AI usage in news media is not primarily rooted in a perceived lack of quality, and that by disclosing using AI, journalists could attract more immediate engagement with their content, at least in the short term.

Read more

9/6/2024