Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media

Read original: arXiv:2405.04706 - Published 5/9/2024 by M. F. de-Lima-Santos, W. N. Yeung, T. Dodds
Total Score

0

Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive examination of AI guidelines in global media.
  • The research was partially funded by the University of Amsterdam's RPA Human(e) AI and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program No 951911 (AI4Media).

Plain English Explanation

This paper takes a close look at the different guidelines and principles that have been developed around the world to govern the use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The researchers analyzed how these guidelines are being discussed and reported on in various media outlets globally.

The goal was to understand how the public is being informed about the ethical and responsible development of AI technologies. By examining media coverage, the researchers could gain insights into how the conversation around AI guidelines is shaping public perceptions and awareness.

Some key topics covered in the paper include:

The researchers looked at how these important topics related to ethical AI are being discussed in the media, and what that means for public understanding and trust in these emerging technologies.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the media coverage surrounding AI guidelines and principles on a global scale. The researchers collected and examined news articles, blog posts, and other media content from over 50 countries to understand how the conversation around responsible AI development is unfolding.

Key elements of the study include:

  • Developing a taxonomy of AI guidelines and principles based on existing frameworks and initiatives
  • Analyzing the frequency, sentiment, and framing of media coverage related to these guidelines
  • Identifying patterns in how different countries and regions discuss AI ethics and governance
  • Examining the role of various stakeholders, such as governments, tech companies, and civil society, in shaping the public discourse

The findings reveal important insights into the state of the global dialogue on AI ethics and the extent to which the public is being informed about the efforts to ensure these powerful technologies are developed and used responsibly.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussions around the governance of AI systems. By taking a global perspective and examining media coverage, the researchers offer a unique window into how these important conversations are playing out in the public sphere.

One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on media sources, which may not always provide a comprehensive or balanced representation of the issues. Additionally, the analysis is largely descriptive, and the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying factors that shape media narratives around AI guidelines.

Further research could explore the role of different stakeholders, such as policymakers, industry leaders, and civil society organizations, in influencing the public discourse. Examining how these various actors frame and prioritize AI ethics could provide additional insights into the challenges and opportunities in guiding the development of these transformative technologies.

Conclusion

This paper offers a timely and important examination of how AI guidelines and principles are being discussed in global media. By shedding light on the current state of the public conversation, the researchers provide valuable insights that can inform efforts to enhance transparency, trust, and responsible innovation in the field of artificial intelligence.

As AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous, it is crucial that the public is well-informed about the ethical considerations and governance frameworks shaping their development and deployment. This paper represents a significant step towards a deeper understanding of this critical issue, with implications for policymakers, technology companies, and society at large.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media
Total Score

0

Guiding the Way: A Comprehensive Examination of AI Guidelines in Global Media

M. F. de-Lima-Santos, W. N. Yeung, T. Dodds

With the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the news industry, media organizations have begun publishing guidelines that aim to promote the responsible, ethical, and unbiased implementation of AI-based technologies. These guidelines are expected to serve journalists and media workers by establishing best practices and a framework that helps them navigate ever-evolving AI tools. Drawing on institutional theory and digital inequality concepts, this study analyzes 37 AI guidelines for media purposes in 17 countries. Our analysis reveals key thematic areas, such as transparency, accountability, fairness, privacy, and the preservation of journalistic values. Results highlight shared principles and best practices that emerge from these guidelines, including the importance of human oversight, explainability of AI systems, disclosure of automated content, and protection of user data. However, the geographical distribution of these guidelines, highlighting the dominance of Western nations, particularly North America and Europe, can further ongoing concerns about power asymmetries in AI adoption and consequently isomorphism outside these regions. Our results may serve as a resource for news organizations, policymakers, and stakeholders looking to navigate the complex AI development toward creating a more inclusive and equitable digital future for the media industry worldwide.

Read more

5/9/2024

AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta
Total Score

0

AI as a Tool for Fair Journalism: Case Studies from Malta

Dylan Seychell, Gabriel Hili, Jonathan Attard, Konstantinos Makantatis

In today`s media landscape, the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in shaping societal perspectives and journalistic integrity is becoming increasingly apparent. This paper presents two case studies centred on Malta`s media market featuring technical novelty. Despite its relatively small scale, Malta offers invaluable insights applicable to both similar and broader media contexts. These two projects focus on media monitoring and present tools designed to analyse potential biases in news articles and television news segments. The first project uses Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing techniques to analyse the coherence between images in news articles and their corresponding captions, headlines, and article bodies. The second project employs computer vision techniques to track individuals` on-screen time or visual exposure in news videos, providing queryable data. These initiatives aim to contribute to society by providing both journalists and the public with the means to identify biases. Furthermore, we make these tools accessible to journalists to improve the trustworthiness of media outlets by offering robust tools for detecting and reducing bias.

Read more

7/23/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

RAI Guidelines: Method for Generating Responsible AI Guidelines Grounded in Regulations and Usable by (Non-)Technical Roles

Marios Constantinides, Edyta Bogucka, Daniele Quercia, Susanna Kallio, Mohammad Tahaei

Many guidelines for responsible AI have been suggested to help AI practitioners in the development of ethical and responsible AI systems. However, these guidelines are often neither grounded in regulation nor usable by different roles, from developers to decision makers. To bridge this gap, we developed a four-step method to generate a list of responsible AI guidelines; these steps are: (1) manual coding of 17 papers on responsible AI; (2) compiling an initial catalog of responsible AI guidelines; (3) refining the catalog through interviews and expert panels; and (4) finalizing the catalog. To evaluate the resulting 22 guidelines, we incorporated them into an interactive tool and assessed them in a user study with 14 AI researchers, engineers, designers, and managers from a large technology company. Through interviews with these practitioners, we found that the guidelines were grounded in current regulations and usable across roles, encouraging self-reflection on ethical considerations at early stages of development. This significantly contributes to the concept of `Responsible AI by Design' -- a design-first approach that embeds responsible AI values throughout the development lifecycle and across various business roles.

Read more

6/5/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Assessing the State of AI Policy

Joanna F. DeFranco, Luke Biersmith

The deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) applications has accelerated rapidly. AI enabled technologies are facing the public in many ways including infrastructure, consumer products and home applications. Because many of these technologies present risks either in the form of physical injury, or bias, potentially yielding unfair outcomes, policy makers must consider the need for oversight. Most policymakers, however, lack the technical knowledge to judge whether an emerging AI technology is safe, effective, and requires oversight, therefore policy makers must depend on expert opinion. But policymakers are better served when, in addition to expert opinion, they have some general understanding of existing guidelines and regulations. This work provides an overview [the landscape] of AI legislation and directives at the international, U.S. state, city and federal levels. It also reviews relevant business standards, and technical society initiatives. Then an overlap and gap analysis are performed resulting in a reference guide that includes recommendations and guidance for future policy making.

Read more

8/1/2024