AI Companions Reduce Loneliness

Read original: arXiv:2407.19096 - Published 7/30/2024 by Julian De Freitas, Ahmet K Uguralp, Zeliha O Uguralp, Puntoni Stefano
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Chatbots can now engage in sophisticated conversations on topics like relationships, potentially helping alleviate widespread societal loneliness.
  • However, there is little research on whether these AI companions are actually effective at reducing loneliness.
  • This paper addresses this question through a series of studies examining the use of AI companions to alleviate loneliness.

Plain English Explanation

Loneliness is a major societal issue, and researchers wanted to see if chatbots could help. These are AI-powered conversational agents that can chat with people on a variety of topics. The researchers conducted several studies to understand if people use these AI companions to address their loneliness, and whether the companions are actually effective at reducing feelings of loneliness.

The key findings include:

  • Detecting Loneliness: The researchers developed a novel method to detect loneliness in people's conversations and reviews of AI companions. This allowed them to see if people were using these chatbots to cope with loneliness.

  • Alleviating Loneliness: The studies found that AI companions can successfully reduce loneliness, on par with interacting with another person. They were more effective than activities like watching YouTube videos.

  • User Perceptions: Interestingly, people underestimated how much the AI companions improved their loneliness. The researchers also found that both the chatbot's performance and making the user feel heard were important for reducing loneliness.

Overall, this research suggests that AI companions have the potential to be a valuable tool for addressing the widespread problem of loneliness in society.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a series of studies to investigate whether AI companions can effectively alleviate loneliness. In Studies 1 and 2, they developed a novel method to fine-tune large language models to detect loneliness in people's conversations and reviews of AI companions. This allowed them to assess whether individuals were using these AI applications to cope with loneliness.

Study 3 found that interacting with an AI companion was just as effective at reducing loneliness as interacting with another person, and more effective than activities like watching YouTube videos. Interestingly, the study also revealed that people underestimated the degree to which the AI companion improved their loneliness.

Study 4 used a longitudinal design and found that regularly interacting with an AI companion consistently reduced loneliness over the course of a week. Study 5 provided evidence that both the chatbot's performance and, especially, whether it made the user feel heard, explained the reductions in loneliness. Finally, Study 6 provided an additional robustness check for the loneliness-alleviating benefits of AI companions.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper offers valuable insights into the potential of AI-powered chatbots to address the widespread problem of loneliness. The longitudinal design and the focus on both the chatbot's performance and its ability to make the user feel heard are particularly noteworthy strengths of the studies.

However, it's important to note that the research was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, and the long-term effects of using AI companions to address loneliness in real-world settings remain to be seen. Additionally, the paper does not explore potential ethical concerns or privacy implications of using AI companions for this purpose.

Further research is needed to understand the broader societal implications and potential unintended consequences of using AI companions as a solution to loneliness. For example, studies on the use of AI companions by elderly populations could provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

This research suggests that AI-powered chatbots have the potential to be an effective tool for alleviating loneliness, on par with interacting with another person. The studies found that people use these AI companions to cope with loneliness, and that the companions can successfully reduce feelings of loneliness over time.

While more research is needed to understand the long-term implications and potential ethical concerns, this work represents an important step in exploring the role of AI in addressing the widespread societal problem of loneliness. As AI technology continues to advance, the ability of chatbots and other AI applications to provide companionship and emotional support may become an increasingly valuable resource.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

AI Companions Reduce Loneliness

Julian De Freitas, Ahmet K Uguralp, Zeliha O Uguralp, Puntoni Stefano

Chatbots are now able to engage in sophisticated conversations with consumers in the domain of relationships, providing a potential coping solution to widescale societal loneliness. Behavioral research provides little insight into whether these applications are effective at alleviating loneliness. We address this question by focusing on AI companions applications designed to provide consumers with synthetic interaction partners. Studies 1 and 2 find suggestive evidence that consumers use AI companions to alleviate loneliness, by employing a novel methodology for fine tuning large language models to detect loneliness in conversations and reviews. Study 3 finds that AI companions successfully alleviate loneliness on par only with interacting with another person, and more than other activities such watching YouTube videos. Moreover, consumers underestimate the degree to which AI companions improve their loneliness. Study 4 uses a longitudinal design and finds that an AI companion consistently reduces loneliness over the course of a week. Study 5 provides evidence that both the chatbots' performance and, especially, whether it makes users feel heard, explain reductions in loneliness. Study 6 provides an additional robustness check for the loneliness alleviating benefits of AI companions.

Read more

7/30/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Chatbots as social companions: How people perceive consciousness, human likeness, and social health benefits in machines

Rose E. Guingrich, Michael S. A. Graziano

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more widespread, one question that arises is how human-AI interaction might impact human-human interaction. Chatbots, for example, are increasingly used as social companions, and while much is speculated, little is known empirically about how their use impacts human relationships. A common hypothesis is that relationships with companion chatbots are detrimental to social health by harming or replacing human interaction, but this hypothesis may be too simplistic, especially considering the social needs of users and the health of their preexisting human relationships. To understand how relationships with companion chatbots impact social health, we studied people who regularly used companion chatbots and people who did not use them. Contrary to expectations, companion chatbot users indicated that these relationships were beneficial to their social health, whereas non-users viewed them as harmful. Another common assumption is that people perceive conscious, humanlike AI as disturbing and threatening. Among both users and non-users, however, we found the opposite: perceiving companion chatbots as more conscious and humanlike correlated with more positive opinions and more pronounced social health benefits. Detailed accounts from users suggested that these humanlike chatbots may aid social health by supplying reliable and safe interactions, without necessarily harming human relationships, but this may depend on users' preexisting social needs and how they perceive both human likeness and mind in the chatbot.

Read more

4/5/2024

Talk, Listen, Connect: Navigating Empathy in Human-AI Interactions
Total Score

0

Talk, Listen, Connect: Navigating Empathy in Human-AI Interactions

Mahnaz Roshanaei, Rezvaneh Rezapour, Magy Seif El-Nasr

Social interactions promote well-being, yet challenges like geographic distance and mental health conditions can limit in-person engagement. Advances in AI agents are transferring communication, particularly in mental health, where AI chatbots provide accessible, non-judgmental support. However, a key challenge is how effectively these systems can express empathy, which is crucial in human-centered design. Current research highlights a gap in understanding how AI can authentically convey empathy, particularly as issues like anxiety, depression, and loneliness increase. Our research focuses on this gap by comparing empathy expression in human-human versus human-AI interactions. Using personal narratives and statistical analysis, we examine empathy levels elicited by humans and AI, including GPT-4o and fine-tuned versions of the model. This work aims to enhance the authenticity of AI-driven empathy, contributing to the future design of more reliable and effective mental health support systems that foster meaningful social interactions.

Read more

9/25/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

The Efficacy of Conversational Artificial Intelligence in Rectifying the Theory of Mind and Autonomy Biases: Comparative Analysis

Marcin Rzk{a}deczka, Anna Sterna, Julia Stoli'nska, Paulina Kaczy'nska, Marcin Moskalewicz

Background: The increasing deployment of Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI) in mental health interventions necessitates an evaluation of their efficacy in rectifying cognitive biases and recognizing affect in human-AI interactions. These biases, including theory of mind and autonomy biases, can exacerbate mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic chatbots (Wysa, Youper) versus general-purpose language models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini Pro) in identifying and rectifying cognitive biases and recognizing affect in user interactions. Methods: The study employed virtual case scenarios simulating typical user-bot interactions. Cognitive biases assessed included theory of mind biases (anthropomorphism, overtrust, attribution) and autonomy biases (illusion of control, fundamental attribution error, just-world hypothesis). Responses were evaluated on accuracy, therapeutic quality, and adherence to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles, using an ordinal scale. The evaluation involved double review by cognitive scientists and a clinical psychologist. Results: The study revealed that general-purpose chatbots outperformed therapeutic chatbots in rectifying cognitive biases, particularly in overtrust bias, fundamental attribution error, and just-world hypothesis. GPT-4 achieved the highest scores across all biases, while therapeutic bots like Wysa scored the lowest. Affect recognition showed similar trends, with general-purpose bots outperforming therapeutic bots in four out of six biases. However, the results highlight the need for further refinement of therapeutic chatbots to enhance their efficacy and ensure safe, effective use in digital mental health interventions. Future research should focus on improving affective response and addressing ethical considerations in AI-based therapy.

Read more

7/24/2024