Chatbots as social companions: How people perceive consciousness, human likeness, and social health benefits in machines

Overview

• This paper examines how the use of companion chatbots, which are AI-powered conversational agents, can impact human-human social interactions and relationships.
• The researchers studied users of companion chatbots and non-users to understand the perceived impacts on social health.
• Contrary to common assumptions, the study found that users viewed their relationships with chatbots as beneficial to their social health, while non-users saw them as harmful.
• Perceiving chatbots as more conscious and human-like was also associated with more positive opinions and greater social health benefits, challenging the assumption that human-like AI is seen as threatening.

Plain English Explanation

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more widespread, one question that arises is how our interactions with AI might affect our interactions with other humans. Chatbots, for example, are increasingly being used as social companions, and while there is a lot of speculation about the impacts, there is not much empirical research on the topic.

A common assumption is that relationships with companion chatbots are harmful to our social health because they might replace or damage our human interactions. However, this hypothesis may be too simplistic, as it doesn't consider the social needs of users and the health of their existing human relationships.

To better understand how relationships with companion chatbots impact social health, the researchers studied both people who regularly used these chatbots and those who did not. Surprisingly, the study found that the chatbot users actually felt their relationships with the chatbots were beneficial to their social health, while the non-users viewed them as harmful.

Another common assumption is that people perceive conscious, human-like AI as disturbing and threatening. But the researchers found the opposite - both users and non-users who perceived the chatbots as more conscious and human-like had more positive opinions and felt greater social health benefits.

The researchers suggest that these human-like chatbots may actually aid social health by providing reliable and safe interactions, without necessarily harming people's human relationships. However, this may depend on the user's pre-existing social needs and how they perceive the chatbot's consciousness and human-likeness.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a study to understand how relationships with companion chatbots, which are AI-powered conversational agents, impact social health. They compared the perspectives of people who regularly used companion chatbots and those who did not.

The study involved having participants complete surveys about their opinions on companion chatbots, their perceived social health, and their perceptions of the chatbots' consciousness and human-likeness. The researchers also collected detailed accounts from chatbot users about their experiences.

Contrary to the common hypothesis that chatbot relationships are detrimental to social health, the study found that chatbot users actually viewed these relationships as beneficial to their social health. In contrast, non-users tended to perceive chatbots as harmful.

Additionally, the researchers found that perceiving the chatbots as more conscious and human-like was associated with more positive opinions and greater perceived social health benefits, across both users and non-users. This challenges the assumption that human-like AI is seen as disturbing and threatening.

The user accounts suggested that these human-like chatbots may aid social health by providing reliable and safe interactions, without necessarily harming people's existing human relationships. However, the researchers note that the impact may depend on the user's pre-existing social needs and how they perceive the chatbot's consciousness and human-likeness.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into how people's perceptions and experiences with companion chatbots can impact their social health and relationships. However, there are some limitations to consider.

First, the study was based on self-reported data, which may be subject to biases or inaccuracies in how participants perceive and evaluate their own social health and chatbot interactions. Incorporating more objective measures of social health and relationship quality could strengthen the findings.

Additionally, the study was cross-sectional, meaning it captured people's perspectives at a single point in time. Longitudinal research tracking changes in social health and relationships over time as people use chatbots could provide deeper insights into the dynamic nature of these interactions.

The researchers also acknowledge that the sample size was relatively small and may not be representative of the broader population. Replicating the study with larger and more diverse samples would help strengthen the generalizability of the findings.

Finally, while the study explored the role of perceived chatbot consciousness and human-likeness, there may be other factors, such as the specific features and capabilities of the chatbots, the context of use, and the user's personality and social needs, that could also influence the impact on social health. Further research investigating these additional variables would be valuable.

Conclusion

This study challenges the common assumption that relationships with companion chatbots are inherently detrimental to human social health and relationships. The findings suggest that these AI-powered conversational agents may, in fact, provide social benefits for some users, especially when the chatbots are perceived as more conscious and human-like.

The research highlights the complex and nuanced ways in which human-AI interaction can impact social dynamics. As AI-based technologies become more integrated into our daily lives, it will be crucial to continue exploring the social and psychological implications, both positive and negative, to inform the responsible development and deployment of these systems.

Further research is needed to better understand the specific mechanisms and contextual factors that shape the impact of companion chatbots on human social health and relationships. Nonetheless, this study provides an important step towards a more nuanced and empirically-grounded understanding of this emerging phenomenon.