AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- AI-powered autonomous weapons (AWS) pose significant risks to geopolitical stability and could threaten AI research
- The paper explores the current state of AWS development, the potential risks they pose, and the need for greater oversight and regulation
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the growing use of AI-powered autonomous weapons (AWS) and the risks they pose to global stability and the future of AI research. AWS are weapon systems that can identify and engage targets without direct human control. While these technologies are still developing, they have the potential to increase the scale and speed of warfare in ways that could destabilize geopolitics.
The paper outlines the current state of AWS development, including the varying levels of autonomy and the nations and organizations that are actively pursuing these capabilities. It then explores the key risks associated with AWS, such as the potential for increased military escalation, the erosion of human control over life-or-death decisions, and the diversion of AI research towards military applications.
The authors argue that the use of AWS risks undermining international norms and exacerbating tensions between nations. They also highlight the threat that AWS pose to the broader AI research community, as the public backlash against military AI applications could jeopardize funding and public support for AI development overall.
To address these concerns, the paper calls for greater oversight and regulation of AWS development, as well as the implementation of robust safety measures and ethical frameworks to ensure that these technologies are not misused. The authors emphasize the need for a collaborative, international approach to governing the use of AWS and mitigating their potential negative impacts.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of AI-powered autonomous weapons (AWS). It examines the varying levels of autonomy in AWS systems, ranging from semi-autonomous to fully autonomous, and the nations and organizations that are actively pursuing these capabilities, such as the United States, Russia, and China.
The authors then explore the potential risks associated with the proliferation of AWS, including the possibility of increased military escalation, the erosion of human control over life-or-death decisions, and the diversion of AI research towards military applications. They argue that the use of AWS could undermine international norms and exacerbate tensions between nations, as evidenced by the growing concerns over the power of AI-enabled systems and the security risks posed by AI-ML-enabled connected systems.
The paper also highlights the threat that AWS pose to the broader AI research community, as the public backlash against military AI applications could jeopardize funding and public support for AI development overall. The authors argue that this could have far-reaching consequences, as AI research is crucial for addressing a wide range of societal challenges, and the public's perception of AI will play a significant role in shaping its future development.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the potential risks associated with the development and use of AI-powered autonomous weapons. The authors provide a well-researched and thoughtful analysis of the current state of AWS and the threats they pose to geopolitical stability and the broader AI research community.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the technical details of AWS systems or the specific approaches being taken by different nations and organizations. While this may be outside the scope of the paper, a more in-depth technical analysis could provide additional insights and help inform the discussion around regulation and oversight.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential benefits of AWS, such as their ability to reduce military casualties or perform tasks that are too dangerous for human soldiers. While the authors rightly focus on the risks, a more balanced perspective that acknowledges both the potential benefits and drawbacks of these technologies could strengthen the overall argument.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the need to prioritize the governance and regulation of AI-powered autonomous weapons. The authors' call for a collaborative, international approach to addressing these issues is particularly timely and relevant given the rapidly evolving nature of this technology.
Conclusion
The paper highlights the significant risks posed by the development and use of AI-powered autonomous weapons (AWS). It argues that these technologies threaten geopolitical stability and could have far-reaching consequences for the broader AI research community.
The authors provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of AWS development, including the varying levels of autonomy and the nations and organizations pursuing these capabilities. They then explore the key risks associated with AWS, such as increased military escalation, the erosion of human control, and the diversion of AI research towards military applications.
To address these concerns, the paper calls for greater oversight and regulation of AWS development, as well as the implementation of robust safety measures and ethical frameworks. The authors emphasize the need for a collaborative, international approach to governing the use of AWS and mitigating their potential negative impacts on global stability and the future of AI research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research
Riley Simmons-Edler, Ryan Badman, Shayne Longpre, Kanaka Rajan
The recent embrace of machine learning (ML) in the development of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) creates serious risks to geopolitical stability and the free exchange of ideas in AI research. This topic has received comparatively little attention of late compared to risks stemming from superintelligent artificial general intelligence (AGI), but requires fewer assumptions about the course of technological development and is thus a nearer-future issue. ML is already enabling the substitution of AWS for human soldiers in many battlefield roles, reducing the upfront human cost, and thus political cost, of waging offensive war. In the case of peer adversaries, this increases the likelihood of low intensity conflicts which risk escalation to broader warfare. In the case of non-peer adversaries, it reduces the domestic blowback to wars of aggression. This effect can occur regardless of other ethical issues around the use of military AI such as the risk of civilian casualties, and does not require any superhuman AI capabilities. Further, the military value of AWS raises the specter of an AI-powered arms race and the misguided imposition of national security restrictions on AI research. Our goal in this paper is to raise awareness among the public and ML researchers on the near-future risks posed by full or near-full autonomy in military technology, and we provide regulatory suggestions to mitigate these risks. We call upon AI policy experts and the defense AI community in particular to embrace transparency and caution in their development and deployment of AWS to avoid the negative effects on global stability and AI research that we highlight here.
Read more6/4/2024
🤖
0
Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress
Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, Pieter Abbeel, Trevor Darrell, Yuval Noah Harari, Ya-Qin Zhang, Lan Xue, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Gillian Hadfield, Jeff Clune, Tegan Maharaj, Frank Hutter, At{i}l{i}m Gunec{s} Baydin, Sheila McIlraith, Qiqi Gao, Ashwin Acharya, David Krueger, Anca Dragan, Philip Torr, Stuart Russell, Daniel Kahneman, Jan Brauner, Soren Mindermann
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressing rapidly, and companies are shifting their focus to developing generalist AI systems that can autonomously act and pursue goals. Increases in capabilities and autonomy may soon massively amplify AI's impact, with risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. Although researchers have warned of extreme risks from AI, there is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Society's response, despite promising first steps, is incommensurate with the possibility of rapid, transformative progress that is expected by many experts. AI safety research is lagging. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems. In this short consensus paper, we describe extreme risks from upcoming, advanced AI systems. Drawing on lessons learned from other safety-critical technologies, we then outline a comprehensive plan combining technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance mechanisms for a more commensurate preparation.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Killer Apps: Low-Speed, Large-Scale AI Weapons
Philip Feldman, Aaron Dant, James R. Foulds
The accelerating advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), highlighted by the development of cutting-edge Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models by organizations such as OpenAI, Meta, and Anthropic, present new challenges and opportunities in warfare and security. Much of the current focus is on AI's integration within weapons systems and its role in rapid decision-making in kinetic conflict. However, an equally important but often overlooked aspect is the potential of AI-based psychological manipulation at internet scales within the information domain. These capabilities could pose significant threats to individuals, organizations, and societies globally. This paper explores the concept of AI weapons, their deployment, detection, and potential countermeasures.
Read more6/18/2024
🤖
0
US-China perspectives on extreme AI risks and global governance
Akash Wasil, Tim Durgin
The United States and China will play an important role in navigating safety and security challenges relating to advanced artificial intelligence. We sought to better understand how experts in each country describe safety and security threats from advanced artificial intelligence, extreme risks from AI, and the potential for international cooperation. Specifically, we compiled publicly-available statements from major technical and policy leaders in both the United States and China. We focused our analysis on advanced forms of artificial intelligence, such as artificial general intelligence (AGI), that may have the most significant impacts on national and global security. Experts in both countries expressed concern about risks from AGI, risks from intelligence explosions, and risks from AI systems that escape human control. Both countries have also launched early efforts designed to promote international cooperation around safety standards and risk management practices. Notably, our findings only reflect information from publicly available sources. Nonetheless, our findings can inform policymakers and researchers about the state of AI discourse in the US and China. We hope such work can contribute to policy discussions around advanced AI, its global security threats, and potential international dialogues or agreements to mitigate such threats.
Read more7/25/2024