Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress
2310.17688
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressing rapidly, and companies are shifting their focus to developing generalist AI systems that can autonomously act and pursue goals. Increases in capabilities and autonomy may soon massively amplify AI's impact, with risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. Although researchers have warned of extreme risks from AI, there is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Society's response, despite promising first steps, is incommensurate with the possibility of rapid, transformative progress that is expected by many experts. AI safety research is lagging. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems. In this short consensus paper, we describe extreme risks from upcoming, advanced AI systems. Drawing on lessons learned from other safety-critical technologies, we then outline a comprehensive plan combining technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance mechanisms for a more commensurate preparation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Rapid progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) is leading to the development of generalist AI systems that can act autonomously and pursue their own goals.
- These advanced AI systems pose significant risks, including large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control.
- Researchers have warned of these extreme risks, but there is a lack of consensus on how to manage them, and society's response is not commensurate with the possibility of rapid, transformative AI progress.
- AI safety research is lagging, and current governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, especially when it comes to autonomous systems.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is advancing rapidly, and companies are now focused on developing AI systems that can act independently and pursue their own goals, without constant human supervision. As these AI systems become more capable and autonomous, they could have a massive impact on the world, and there are serious risks that need to be addressed.
Some of the potential risks include large-scale harm to society, such as job displacement and social disruption; AI systems being used for malicious purposes, like autonomous weapons; and the possibility of losing human control over these powerful AI systems, which could have catastrophic consequences.
Researchers have warned about these extreme risks, but there is still a lot of uncertainty and debate about how these risks might actually play out, and what can be done to manage them. Despite some promising first steps, society's overall response to the potential dangers of advanced AI is not proportionate to the risk, especially given the rapid progress and transformative potential of AI.
More work is needed to ensure that AI systems are developed and deployed safely, with proper safeguards and governance mechanisms in place to prevent misuse and recklessness, especially when it comes to autonomous AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper describes the rapidly advancing state of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, with companies now focused on developing generalist AI systems that can act autonomously and pursue their own goals. The authors argue that as these AI systems become more capable and autonomous, the risks they pose could be extreme, including large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and an irreversible loss of human control.
The paper notes that while researchers have warned of these risks, there is a lack of consensus on how exactly such risks might arise and how to manage them. The authors state that society's response to the possibility of rapid, transformative AI progress is currently incommensurate, with AI safety research lagging and present governance initiatives lacking the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, particularly when it comes to autonomous systems.
Drawing on lessons learned from other safety-critical technologies, the authors outline a comprehensive plan to address these risks. This plan combines technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance mechanisms to better prepare for the societal impacts of advanced AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the potential risks posed by advanced, autonomous AI systems, and the need for a more robust and coordinated response from the research community, policymakers, and society as a whole. The authors make a compelling case that the current state of AI safety research and governance initiatives is not sufficient to address the scale and severity of the risks they describe.
However, the paper could be strengthened by delving deeper into the specific mechanisms by which these risks might arise, and providing more detailed insights into how the proposed "comprehensive plan" could be implemented in practice. The authors also do not address the potential benefits and opportunities that may come with advanced AI systems, which could help provide a more balanced perspective.
Additionally, the paper would benefit from acknowledging the inherent challenges and uncertainties involved in anticipating and managing the long-term impacts of transformative AI technologies. Encouraging readers to think critically about these complex issues, while maintaining an objective and respectful tone, would further enhance the paper's contribution to this important debate.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the urgent need for a more comprehensive and proactive approach to addressing the risks posed by advanced, autonomous AI systems. As AI technology continues to progress rapidly, the potential for large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and a loss of human control over these powerful systems is a serious concern that requires immediate attention.
While researchers have warned of these extreme risks, the authors argue that society's response has so far been inadequate, with AI safety research lagging and current governance initiatives lacking the necessary mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness. By outlining a plan that combines technical research and development with proactive, adaptive governance, the authors aim to catalyze a more commensurate preparation for the societal impacts of transformative AI progress.
Ultimately, this paper serves as a call to action, urging the research community, policymakers, and the public to come together and address the critical challenges posed by the rise of advanced, autonomous AI systems. Only through a comprehensive and coordinated effort can we hope to ensure that the immense potential of AI is harnessed in a way that benefits humanity as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI
Jamie Bernardi, Gabriel Mukobi, Hilary Greaves, Lennart Heim, Markus Anderljung
0
0
Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse. However, this approach becomes less feasible as the number of developers of advanced AI grows, and impedes beneficial use-cases as well as harmful ones. In response, we urge a complementary approach: increasing societal adaptation to advanced AI, that is, reducing the expected negative impacts from a given level of diffusion of a given AI capability. We introduce a conceptual framework which helps identify adaptive interventions that avoid, defend against and remedy potentially harmful uses of AI systems, illustrated with examples in election manipulation, cyberterrorism, and loss of control to AI decision-makers. We discuss a three-step cycle that society can implement to adapt to AI. Increasing society's ability to implement this cycle builds its resilience to advanced AI. We conclude with concrete recommendations for governments, industry, and third-parties.
5/17/2024
Thousands of AI Authors on the Future of AI
Katja Grace, Harlan Stewart, Julia Fabienne Sandkuhler, Stephen Thomas, Ben Weinstein-Raun, Jan Brauner
0
0
In the largest survey of its kind, 2,778 researchers who had published in top-tier artificial intelligence (AI) venues gave predictions on the pace of AI progress and the nature and impacts of advanced AI systems The aggregate forecasts give at least a 50% chance of AI systems achieving several milestones by 2028, including autonomously constructing a payment processing site from scratch, creating a song indistinguishable from a new song by a popular musician, and autonomously downloading and fine-tuning a large language model. If science continues undisrupted, the chance of unaided machines outperforming humans in every possible task was estimated at 10% by 2027, and 50% by 2047. The latter estimate is 13 years earlier than that reached in a similar survey we conducted only one year earlier [Grace et al., 2022]. However, the chance of all human occupations becoming fully automatable was forecast to reach 10% by 2037, and 50% as late as 2116 (compared to 2164 in the 2022 survey). Most respondents expressed substantial uncertainty about the long-term value of AI progress: While 68.3% thought good outcomes from superhuman AI are more likely than bad, of these net optimists 48% gave at least a 5% chance of extremely bad outcomes such as human extinction, and 59% of net pessimists gave 5% or more to extremely good outcomes. Between 38% and 51% of respondents gave at least a 10% chance to advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. More than half suggested that substantial or extreme concern is warranted about six different AI-related scenarios, including misinformation, authoritarian control, and inequality. There was disagreement about whether faster or slower AI progress would be better for the future of humanity. However, there was broad agreement that research aimed at minimizing potential risks from AI systems ought to be prioritized more.
5/2/2024
AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research
Riley Simmons-Edler, Ryan Badman, Shayne Longpre, Kanaka Rajan
0
0
The recent embrace of machine learning (ML) in the development of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) creates serious risks to geopolitical stability and the free exchange of ideas in AI research. This topic has received comparatively little attention of late compared to risks stemming from superintelligent artificial general intelligence (AGI), but requires fewer assumptions about the course of technological development and is thus a nearer-future issue. ML is already enabling the substitution of AWS for human soldiers in many battlefield roles, reducing the upfront human cost, and thus political cost, of waging offensive war. In the case of peer adversaries, this increases the likelihood of low intensity conflicts which risk escalation to broader warfare. In the case of non-peer adversaries, it reduces the domestic blowback to wars of aggression. This effect can occur regardless of other ethical issues around the use of military AI such as the risk of civilian casualties, and does not require any superhuman AI capabilities. Further, the military value of AWS raises the specter of an AI-powered arms race and the misguided imposition of national security restrictions on AI research. Our goal in this paper is to raise awareness among the public and ML researchers on the near-future risks posed by full or near-full autonomy in military technology, and we provide regulatory suggestions to mitigate these risks. We call upon AI policy experts and the defense AI community in particular to embrace transparency and caution in their development and deployment of AWS to avoid the negative effects on global stability and AI research that we highlight here.
6/4/2024
Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems
David davidad Dalrymple, Joar Skalse, Yoshua Bengio, Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Sanjit Seshia, Steve Omohundro, Christian Szegedy, Ben Goldhaber, Nora Ammann, Alessandro Abate, Joe Halpern, Clark Barrett, Ding Zhao, Tan Zhi-Xuan, Jeannette Wing, Joshua Tenenbaum
0
0
Ensuring that AI systems reliably and robustly avoid harmful or dangerous behaviours is a crucial challenge, especially for AI systems with a high degree of autonomy and general intelligence, or systems used in safety-critical contexts. In this paper, we will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. This is achieved by the interplay of three core components: a world model (which provides a mathematical description of how the AI system affects the outside world), a safety specification (which is a mathematical description of what effects are acceptable), and a verifier (which provides an auditable proof certificate that the AI satisfies the safety specification relative to the world model). We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them. We also argue for the necessity of this approach to AI safety, and for the inadequacy of the main alternative approaches.
5/20/2024