Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning
2405.18540
0
0
Abstract
Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe and responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). Developing effective protection against many modes of attack prompts requires discovering diverse attacks. Automated red-teaming typically uses reinforcement learning to fine-tune an attacker language model to generate prompts that elicit undesirable responses from a target LLM, as measured, for example, by an auxiliary toxicity classifier. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. As a flexible and probabilistically principled alternative, we propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts. We find that the attacks generated by our method are effective against a wide range of target LLMs, both with and without safety tuning, and transfer well between target LLMs. Finally, we demonstrate that models safety-tuned using a dataset of red-teaming prompts generated by our method are robust to attacks from other RL-based red-teaming approaches.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores techniques for learning diverse attacks on large language models, with the goal of enabling more robust "red-teaming" and safety tuning of these models.
- The researchers propose a novel method for generating adversarial attacks that can bypass existing defense mechanisms and expose vulnerabilities in large language models.
- The paper also introduces a game-theoretic framework for modeling the interplay between language model developers and malicious actors, providing insights into optimal defense strategies.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on finding ways to test the security and safety of large language models, like GPT-4, by trying to "hack" or exploit them in creative ways. The researchers developed a new technique that can generate a wide variety of attacks that can get around the current defenses that are used to try to make these models safer and more secure.
They also created a framework that models the "back-and-forth" between the companies developing these language models and the people trying to find ways to misuse or manipulate them. This gives insights into the best strategies for defending against these kinds of attacks.
The goal is to make these powerful language models more robust and reliable, by identifying their vulnerabilities before they can be exploited in the real world. The techniques described in this paper could help improve the safety and security of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a method for generating diverse adversarial attacks on large language models, with the aim of enabling more robust "red-teaming" and safety tuning. The researchers develop a novel attack generation framework that can bypass existing defenses and uncover vulnerabilities in models like GPT-4.
The framework uses a game-theoretic approach to model the interplay between the language model developers and malicious actors trying to exploit the models. This provides insights into optimal defense strategies, as described in the related work on red-teaming large language models.
The attack generation process involves training a separate model to craft adversarial prompts that can fool the target language model into producing undesirable outputs. This approach aims to generate a diverse set of attacks that go beyond simple prompting attacks and explore more nuanced vulnerabilities.
The paper also discusses the challenges of ensuring the safety and generalization of large language models and the potential for techniques like instruction tuning to improve their robustness.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to identifying vulnerabilities in large language models, which is an important area of research for ensuring the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems. The game-theoretic framework provides a useful lens for understanding the dynamics between model developers and potential adversaries.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential for unintended consequences or misuse of the attack generation techniques. While the goal is to improve model safety, there is a risk that the same techniques could be used by malicious actors to actively undermine language models in the real world.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical considerations and potential societal impacts of this type of research. As language models become increasingly ubiquitous, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of techniques that can be used to exploit their vulnerabilities.
Further research is needed to ensure that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, and to develop robust safeguards and responsible use guidelines for these attack generation techniques.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to testing the security and safety of large language models, with the goal of making these powerful AI systems more robust and reliable. The researchers developed a method for generating diverse adversarial attacks that can bypass existing defenses, as well as a game-theoretic framework for modeling the interplay between model developers and potential adversaries.
While the techniques described in the paper have the potential to significantly improve the safety and security of large language models, they also raise important ethical and societal concerns that warrant further investigation. As these models become more ubiquitous, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of techniques that can be used to exploit their vulnerabilities, and to develop responsible guidelines for their use.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
Simone Tedeschi, Felix Friedrich, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting, Roberto Navigli, Huu Nguyen, Bo Li
0
0
When building Large Language Models (LLMs), it is paramount to bear safety in mind and protect them with guardrails. Indeed, LLMs should never generate content promoting or normalizing harmful, illegal, or unethical behavior that may contribute to harm to individuals or society. This principle applies to both normal and adversarial use. In response, we introduce ALERT, a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It is designed to evaluate the safety of LLMs through red teaming methodologies and consists of more than 45k instructions categorized using our novel taxonomy. By subjecting LLMs to adversarial testing scenarios, ALERT aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models. Furthermore, the fine-grained taxonomy enables researchers to perform an in-depth evaluation that also helps one to assess the alignment with various policies. In our experiments, we extensively evaluate 10 popular open- and closed-source LLMs and demonstrate that many of them still struggle to attain reasonable levels of safety.
6/26/2024
Red Teaming Game: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Red Teaming Language Models
Chengdong Ma, Ziran Yang, Minquan Gao, Hai Ci, Jun Gao, Xuehai Pan, Yaodong Yang
0
0
Deployable Large Language Models (LLMs) must conform to the criterion of helpfulness and harmlessness, thereby achieving consistency between LLMs outputs and human values. Red-teaming techniques constitute a critical way towards this criterion. Existing work rely solely on manual red team designs and heuristic adversarial prompts for vulnerability detection and optimization. These approaches lack rigorous mathematical formulation, thus limiting the exploration of diverse attack strategy within quantifiable measure and optimization of LLMs under convergence guarantees. In this paper, we present Red-teaming Game (RTG), a general game-theoretic framework without manual annotation. RTG is designed for analyzing the multi-turn attack and defense interactions between Red-team language Models (RLMs) and Blue-team Language Model (BLM). Within the RTG, we propose Gamified Red-teaming Solver (GRTS) with diversity measure of the semantic space. GRTS is an automated red teaming technique to solve RTG towards Nash equilibrium through meta-game analysis, which corresponds to the theoretically guaranteed optimization direction of both RLMs and BLM. Empirical results in multi-turn attacks with RLMs show that GRTS autonomously discovered diverse attack strategies and effectively improved security of LLMs, outperforming existing heuristic red-team designs. Overall, RTG has established a foundational framework for red teaming tasks and constructed a new scalable oversight technique for alignment.
4/9/2024
💬
Mimicking User Data: On Mitigating Fine-Tuning Risks in Closed Large Language Models
Francisco Eiras, Aleksandar Petrov, Phillip H. S. Torr, M. Pawan Kumar, Adel Bibi
0
0
Fine-tuning large language models on small, high-quality datasets can enhance their performance on specific downstream tasks. Recent research shows that fine-tuning on benign, instruction-following data can inadvertently undo the safety alignment process and increase a model's propensity to comply with harmful queries. Although critical, understanding and mitigating safety risks in well-defined tasks remains distinct from the instruction-following context due to structural differences in the data. Our work explores the risks associated with fine-tuning closed models - where providers control how user data is utilized in the process - across diverse task-specific data. We demonstrate how malicious actors can subtly manipulate the structure of almost any task-specific dataset to foster significantly more dangerous model behaviors, while maintaining an appearance of innocuity and reasonable downstream task performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel mitigation strategy that mixes in safety data which mimics the task format and prompting style of the user data, showing this is more effective than existing baselines at re-establishing safety alignment while maintaining similar task performance.
6/18/2024
🚀
Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuning
Qiusi Zhan, Richard Fang, Rohan Bindu, Akul Gupta, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Daniel Kang
0
0
As large language models (LLMs) have increased in their capabilities, so does their potential for dual use. To reduce harmful outputs, produces and vendors of LLMs have used reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF). In tandem, LLM vendors have been increasingly enabling fine-tuning of their most powerful models. However, concurrent work has shown that fine-tuning can remove RLHF protections. We may expect that the most powerful models currently available (GPT-4) are less susceptible to fine-tuning attacks. In this work, we show the contrary: fine-tuning allows attackers to remove RLHF protections with as few as 340 examples and a 95% success rate. These training examples can be automatically generated with weaker models. We further show that removing RLHF protections does not decrease usefulness on non-censored outputs, providing evidence that our fine-tuning strategy does not decrease usefulness despite using weaker models to generate training data. Our results show the need for further research on protections on LLMs.
4/9/2024