Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences

Read original: arXiv:2409.16478 - Published 9/26/2024 by Erica Coppolillo, Simone Mungari, Ettore Ritacco, Francesco Fabbri, Marco Minici, Francesco Bonchi, Giuseppe Manco
Total Score

0

Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper proposes a simulation framework to study the effects of recommender systems on user preferences over time.
  • It explores the concept of "algorithmic drift," where users' preferences gradually shift due to the recommendations they receive.
  • The framework allows researchers to simulate user behavior and measure how recommender systems impact user preferences.

Plain English Explanation

Recommender systems are algorithms that suggest products, content, or information to users based on their past interactions and preferences. However, these systems can have unintended consequences over time.

The Algorithmic Drift paper introduces a simulation framework to understand how recommender systems can influence and potentially change user preferences over time. This "algorithmic drift" effect occurs when a user's interests gradually shift due to the recommendations they receive.

For example, imagine a music streaming service that consistently recommends a certain genre to a user. Over time, the user may start to prefer that genre more, even if it wasn't their original preference. The simulation framework allows researchers to model and measure this kind of preference shift.

By using this simulation tool, researchers can study the long-term impacts of recommender systems and identify potential issues, such as reducing diversity or influencing users' opinions. This can help inform the design of more ethical and transparent recommender systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a simulation framework that models the interactions between users and a recommender system. The framework includes the following key components:

  1. User Model: Represents individual users and their evolving preferences over time. Users have an initial set of preferences that can shift based on the recommendations they receive.

  2. Recommender System: Provides personalized recommendations to users based on their current preferences and interaction history. The recommender system is a crucial part of the feedback loop that can drive algorithmic drift.

  3. Simulation Dynamics: Defines how users interact with the recommender system and how their preferences change over time. This includes modeling user engagement, response to recommendations, and preference update mechanisms.

The researchers conducted experiments using this simulation framework to investigate the effects of different recommender system designs and user characteristics on the emergence of algorithmic drift. They measured metrics such as the degree of preference shift, the diversity of recommendations, and the convergence of user preferences.

The results reveal that recommender systems can indeed lead to significant changes in user preferences over time, with the extent of drift depending on factors like the recommender's exploration-exploitation tradeoff, the users' initial preference diversity, and the sensitivity of user preferences to recommendations.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Simplifying Assumptions: The user model and simulation dynamics rely on simplifying assumptions that may not fully capture the complexities of real-world user behavior and preference formation.

  2. Lack of Empirical Validation: The framework has not yet been validated against real-world data, which is necessary to ensure the simulation accurately reflects actual user-recommender interactions.

  3. Generalizability: The specific findings may be dependent on the particular configurations and design choices made in the simulation. More research is needed to understand the generalizability of the results.

  4. Ethical Considerations: The paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of algorithmic drift, such as its potential to reinforce biases or limit user agency. Further exploration of these issues would be valuable.

  5. Practical Applications: While the simulation framework is a useful research tool, more work is needed to translate the insights into practical guidelines for the design of ethical and transparent recommender systems.

Conclusion

The Algorithmic Drift paper presents a novel simulation framework that allows researchers to study the long-term effects of recommender systems on user preferences. By modeling the feedback loop between users and recommender systems, the framework enables the exploration of the "algorithmic drift" phenomenon, where user preferences gradually shift due to the recommendations they receive.

The results highlight the potential for recommender systems to significantly influence user preferences over time, with implications for the diversity of recommendations, the convergence of user interests, and the ethical design of these systems. This work lays the groundwork for further research on interactive counterfactual exploration of algorithmic harms and the development of more socially responsible recommender systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences
Total Score

0

Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences

Erica Coppolillo, Simone Mungari, Ettore Ritacco, Francesco Fabbri, Marco Minici, Francesco Bonchi, Giuseppe Manco

Digital platforms such as social media and e-commerce websites adopt Recommender Systems to provide value to the user. However, the social consequences deriving from their adoption are still unclear. Many scholars argue that recommenders may lead to detrimental effects, such as bias-amplification deriving from the feedback loop between algorithmic suggestions and users' choices. Nonetheless, the extent to which recommenders influence changes in users leaning remains uncertain. In this context, it is important to provide a controlled environment for evaluating the recommendation algorithm before deployment. To address this, we propose a stochastic simulation framework that mimics user-recommender system interactions in a long-term scenario. In particular, we simulate the user choices by formalizing a user model, which comprises behavioral aspects, such as the user resistance towards the recommendation algorithm and their inertia in relying on the received suggestions. Additionally, we introduce two novel metrics for quantifying the algorithm's impact on user preferences, specifically in terms of drift over time. We conduct an extensive evaluation on multiple synthetic datasets, aiming at testing the robustness of our framework when considering different scenarios and hyper-parameters setting. The experimental results prove that the proposed methodology is effective in detecting and quantifying the drift over the users preferences by means of the simulation. All the code and data used to perform the experiments are publicly available.

Read more

9/26/2024

Interactive Counterfactual Exploration of Algorithmic Harms in Recommender Systems
Total Score

0

Interactive Counterfactual Exploration of Algorithmic Harms in Recommender Systems

Yongsu Ahn, Quinn K Wolter, Jonilyn Dick, Janet Dick, Yu-Ru Lin

Recommender systems have become integral to digital experiences, shaping user interactions and preferences across various platforms. Despite their widespread use, these systems often suffer from algorithmic biases that can lead to unfair and unsatisfactory user experiences. This study introduces an interactive tool designed to help users comprehend and explore the impacts of algorithmic harms in recommender systems. By leveraging visualizations, counterfactual explanations, and interactive modules, the tool allows users to investigate how biases such as miscalibration, stereotypes, and filter bubbles affect their recommendations. Informed by in-depth user interviews, this tool benefits both general users and researchers by increasing transparency and offering personalized impact assessments, ultimately fostering a better understanding of algorithmic biases and contributing to more equitable recommendation outcomes. This work provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in mitigating bias and enhancing fairness in machine learning algorithms.

Read more

9/12/2024

Bias Reduction in Social Networks through Agent-Based Simulations
Total Score

0

Bias Reduction in Social Networks through Agent-Based Simulations

Nathan Bartley, Keith Burghardt, Kristina Lerman

Online social networks use recommender systems to suggest relevant information to their users in the form of personalized timelines. Studying how these systems expose people to information at scale is difficult to do as one cannot assume each user is subject to the same timeline condition and building appropriate evaluation infrastructure is costly. We show that a simple agent-based model where users have fixed preferences affords us the ability to compare different recommender systems (and thus different personalized timelines) in their ability to skew users' perception of their network. Importantly, we show that a simple greedy algorithm that constructs a feed based on network properties reduces such perception biases comparable to a random feed. This underscores the influence network structure has in determining the effectiveness of recommender systems in the social network context and offers a tool for mitigating perception biases through algorithmic feed construction.

Read more

9/26/2024

Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation Policies
Total Score

0

Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation Policies

Chih-Wei Hsu, Martin Mladenov, Ofer Meshi, James Pine, Hubert Pham, Shane Li, Xujian Liang, Anton Polishko, Li Yang, Ben Scheetz, Craig Boutilier

Evaluation of policies in recommender systems typically involves A/B testing using live experiments on real users to assess a new policy's impact on relevant metrics. This ``gold standard'' comes at a high cost, however, in terms of cycle time, user cost, and potential user retention. In developing policies for ``onboarding'' new users, these costs can be especially problematic, since on-boarding occurs only once. In this work, we describe a simulation methodology used to augment (and reduce) the use of live experiments. We illustrate its deployment for the evaluation of ``preference elicitation'' algorithms used to onboard new users of the YouTube Music platform. By developing counterfactually robust user behavior models, and a simulation service that couples such models with production infrastructure, we are able to test new algorithms in a way that reliably predicts their performance on key metrics when deployed live. We describe our domain, our simulation models and platform, results of experiments and deployment, and suggest future steps needed to further realistic simulation as a powerful complement to live experiments.

Read more

9/27/2024