Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation Policies
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Describes a user simulation approach to evaluate preference elicitation policies in recommender systems (RS)
- Aims to minimize the need for live experiments by using simulated users to assess different strategies for gathering user preferences
- Presents a framework for simulating user preferences and interactions with an RS to compare the effectiveness of various preference elicitation techniques
Plain English Explanation
Recommender systems are tools that suggest products or content to users based on their preferences. Building effective recommender systems requires understanding user preferences, which is often done through live experiments where real users interact with the system.
However, running live experiments can be costly and time-consuming. This paper introduces a way to simulate user behavior and preferences to evaluate different strategies for gathering user preferences without needing to conduct as many real-world experiments.
The researchers developed a framework that models user preferences and how users might interact with a music recommender system. They then used this simulated environment to compare the performance of different techniques for eliciting user preferences, such as asking users directly or observing their interactions.
This allows recommender system designers to test various preference elicitation strategies without needing to recruit large numbers of real users for live experiments. The simulation-based approach can help identify the most effective ways to gather user preferences and improve recommender system performance.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a user simulation framework to evaluate preference elicitation policies in interactive recommender systems. The key components include:
-
User Model: The researchers developed a generative model to simulate user preferences and how those preferences evolve over time as the user interacts with the recommender system.
-
Interaction Simulator: This module simulates how the user would interact with the recommender system, including providing feedback, making selections, and updating their preferences.
-
Preference Elicitation Policies: The framework supports evaluating different strategies for eliciting user preferences, such as:
- Direct preference elicitation: Asking the user to rate or provide feedback on items
- Implicit preference elicitation: Observing the user's interactions to infer their preferences
The researchers conducted experiments using the simulation framework to compare the effectiveness of these preference elicitation policies. They found that a hybrid approach combining both direct and implicit elicitation outperformed either method alone in terms of recommendation accuracy and user satisfaction.
Critical Analysis
The user simulation approach presented in this paper is a novel and promising way to reduce the need for live experiments in recommender system development. By modeling user behavior and preferences, researchers can explore different preference elicitation strategies without the time and cost associated with recruiting large numbers of real users.
However, the fidelity of the simulated user model is a key limitation. While the authors demonstrate the model can capture certain user behaviors, it may not fully reflect the complexity of real human preferences and decision-making processes. Further research is needed to validate the simulation framework against real-world user data.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a music recommender system use case. The generalizability of the approach to other domains, such as e-commerce or content recommendations, should be explored. Differences in user preferences and interactions across domains may require modifications to the simulation framework.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a user simulation framework to evaluate preference elicitation policies in recommender systems. By modeling user behavior and preferences, the approach allows researchers to test different strategies for gathering user input without the need for extensive live experiments.
The results suggest that a hybrid approach combining direct and implicit preference elicitation can outperform either method alone. While the simulation-based methodology has limitations, it represents a promising step towards more efficient and effective recommender system development. Further research is needed to refine the user modeling approach and validate its applicability across a broader range of recommender system use cases.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Minimizing Live Experiments in Recommender Systems: User Simulation to Evaluate Preference Elicitation Policies
Chih-Wei Hsu, Martin Mladenov, Ofer Meshi, James Pine, Hubert Pham, Shane Li, Xujian Liang, Anton Polishko, Li Yang, Ben Scheetz, Craig Boutilier
Evaluation of policies in recommender systems typically involves A/B testing using live experiments on real users to assess a new policy's impact on relevant metrics. This ``gold standard'' comes at a high cost, however, in terms of cycle time, user cost, and potential user retention. In developing policies for ``onboarding'' new users, these costs can be especially problematic, since on-boarding occurs only once. In this work, we describe a simulation methodology used to augment (and reduce) the use of live experiments. We illustrate its deployment for the evaluation of ``preference elicitation'' algorithms used to onboard new users of the YouTube Music platform. By developing counterfactually robust user behavior models, and a simulation service that couples such models with production infrastructure, we are able to test new algorithms in a way that reliably predicts their performance on key metrics when deployed live. We describe our domain, our simulation models and platform, results of experiments and deployment, and suggest future steps needed to further realistic simulation as a powerful complement to live experiments.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Algorithmic Drift: A Simulation Framework to Study the Effects of Recommender Systems on User Preferences
Erica Coppolillo, Simone Mungari, Ettore Ritacco, Francesco Fabbri, Marco Minici, Francesco Bonchi, Giuseppe Manco
Digital platforms such as social media and e-commerce websites adopt Recommender Systems to provide value to the user. However, the social consequences deriving from their adoption are still unclear. Many scholars argue that recommenders may lead to detrimental effects, such as bias-amplification deriving from the feedback loop between algorithmic suggestions and users' choices. Nonetheless, the extent to which recommenders influence changes in users leaning remains uncertain. In this context, it is important to provide a controlled environment for evaluating the recommendation algorithm before deployment. To address this, we propose a stochastic simulation framework that mimics user-recommender system interactions in a long-term scenario. In particular, we simulate the user choices by formalizing a user model, which comprises behavioral aspects, such as the user resistance towards the recommendation algorithm and their inertia in relying on the received suggestions. Additionally, we introduce two novel metrics for quantifying the algorithm's impact on user preferences, specifically in terms of drift over time. We conduct an extensive evaluation on multiple synthetic datasets, aiming at testing the robustness of our framework when considering different scenarios and hyper-parameters setting. The experimental results prove that the proposed methodology is effective in detecting and quantifying the drift over the users preferences by means of the simulation. All the code and data used to perform the experiments are publicly available.
Read more9/26/2024
1
An LLM-based Recommender System Environment
Nathan Corecco, Giorgio Piatti, Luca A. Lanzendorfer, Flint Xiaofeng Fan, Roger Wattenhofer
Reinforcement learning (RL) has gained popularity in the realm of recommender systems due to its ability to optimize long-term rewards and guide users in discovering relevant content. However, the successful implementation of RL in recommender systems is challenging because of several factors, including the limited availability of online data for training on-policy methods. This scarcity requires expensive human interaction for online model training. Furthermore, the development of effective evaluation frameworks that accurately reflect the quality of models remains a fundamental challenge in recommender systems. To address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework for synthetic environments that simulate human behavior by harnessing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). We complement our framework with in-depth ablation studies and demonstrate its effectiveness with experiments on movie and book recommendations. Using LLMs as synthetic users, this work introduces a modular and novel framework to train RL-based recommender systems. The software, including the RL environment, is publicly available on GitHub.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Harm Mitigation in Recommender Systems under User Preference Dynamics
Jerry Chee, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Udi Weinsberg, Sarah Dean, Stratis Ioannidis
We consider a recommender system that takes into account the interplay between recommendations, the evolution of user interests, and harmful content. We model the impact of recommendations on user behavior, particularly the tendency to consume harmful content. We seek recommendation policies that establish a tradeoff between maximizing click-through rate (CTR) and mitigating harm. We establish conditions under which the user profile dynamics have a stationary point, and propose algorithms for finding an optimal recommendation policy at stationarity. We experiment on a semi-synthetic movie recommendation setting initialized with real data and observe that our policies outperform baselines at simultaneously maximizing CTR and mitigating harm.
Read more6/17/2024