Algorithms for College Admissions Decision Support: Impacts of Policy Change and Inherent Variability
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the impacts of policy changes and inherent variability on college admissions decision support algorithms
- Investigates how different admission policies and ranking systems can influence the fairness and outcomes of the admissions process
- Highlights the need to carefully consider the design and implementation of algorithmic systems used in high-stakes decision-making like college admissions
Plain English Explanation
This paper explores how the algorithms used to support college admissions decisions can be affected by changes in admission policies and the inherent variability in the admissions process. The researchers investigate how different approaches to ranking and selecting applicants can impact the fairness and outcomes of the admissions system.
The paper emphasizes the importance of carefully designing and implementing these algorithmic systems, as they are often used in high-stakes decision-making that can have significant consequences for individuals and society. By understanding the impacts of policy changes and the inherent variability in the admissions process, the researchers aim to provide insights that can help improve the fairness and transparency of college admissions decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the impacts of policy changes and inherent variability on college admissions decision support algorithms. The researchers use simulations to explore how different admission policies and ranking systems, such as those that incorporate affirmative action or machine learning models, can influence the fairness and outcomes of the admissions process.
The study investigates the arbitrariness and variability inherent in the admissions process, which can be affected by factors such as the specific criteria used, the weighting of different attributes, and the way applicants are ranked and selected. The researchers analyze how these factors can lead to variations in admissions decisions, even for applicants with similar qualifications.
By exploring the impacts of policy changes and inherent variability, the paper highlights the need for a nuanced and careful approach to the design and implementation of algorithmic systems used in high-stakes decision-making, such as college admissions. The findings suggest that these systems must be carefully evaluated for their fairness and potential biases to ensure equitable outcomes and avoid unintended consequences.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several caveats and limitations in its analysis. For example, the researchers note that their simulations may not fully capture the complexity and context-specific factors that influence real-world college admissions decisions. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential impacts of differential feature under-reporting on the fairness of the admissions process.
While the paper provides valuable insights into the impacts of policy changes and inherent variability, further research is needed to fully understand the broader implications of using algorithmic systems in high-stakes decision-making, such as college admissions. This could include exploring the long-term effects of different admission policies on the diversity and composition of student populations, as well as investigating the effects of fairness regulations and institutional policies on the fairness of admissions outcomes.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the need for a nuanced and careful approach to the design and implementation of algorithmic systems used in high-stakes decision-making, such as college admissions. By exploring the impacts of policy changes and inherent variability, the researchers emphasize the importance of understanding the complex factors that can influence the fairness and outcomes of the admissions process.
The findings suggest that these algorithmic systems must be carefully evaluated and monitored to ensure equitable outcomes and avoid unintended consequences. As the use of technology in decision-making continues to grow, this research provides important insights that can inform the development of more transparent, fair, and accountable admissions processes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Algorithms for College Admissions Decision Support: Impacts of Policy Change and Inherent Variability
Jinsook Lee, Emma Harvey, Joyce Zhou, Nikhil Garg, Thorsten Joachims, Rene F. Kizilcec
Each year, selective American colleges sort through tens of thousands of applications to identify a first-year class that displays both academic merit and diversity. In the 2023-2024 admissions cycle, these colleges faced unprecedented challenges. First, the number of applications has been steadily growing. Second, test-optional policies that have remained in place since the COVID-19 pandemic limit access to key information historically predictive of academic success. Most recently, longstanding debates over affirmative action culminated in the Supreme Court banning race-conscious admissions. Colleges have explored machine learning (ML) models to address the issues of scale and missing test scores, often via ranking algorithms intended to focus on 'top' applicants. However, the Court's ruling will force changes to these models, which were able to consider race as a factor in ranking. There is currently a poor understanding of how these mandated changes will shape applicant ranking algorithms, and, by extension, admitted classes. We seek to address this by quantifying the impact of different admission policies on the applications prioritized for review. We show that removing race data from a developed applicant ranking algorithm reduces the diversity of the top-ranked pool without meaningfully increasing the academic merit of that pool. We contextualize this impact by showing that excluding data on applicant race has a greater impact than excluding other potentially informative variables like intended majors. Finally, we measure the impact of policy change on individuals by comparing the arbitrariness in applicant rank attributable to policy change to the arbitrariness attributable to randomness. We find that any given policy has a high degree of arbitrariness and that removing race data from the ranking algorithm increases arbitrariness in outcomes for most applicants.
Read more7/17/2024
🔮
0
Inside the Black Box: Detecting and Mitigating Algorithmic Bias across Racialized Groups in College Student-Success Prediction
Denisa G'andara, Hadis Anahideh, Matthew P. Ison, Lorenzo Picchiarini
Colleges and universities are increasingly turning to algorithms that predict college-student success to inform various decisions, including those related to admissions, budgeting, and student-success interventions. Because predictive algorithms rely on historical data, they capture societal injustices, including racism. In this study, we examine how the accuracy of college student success predictions differs between racialized groups, signaling algorithmic bias. We also evaluate the utility of leading bias-mitigating techniques in addressing this bias. Using nationally representative data from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 and various machine learning modeling approaches, we demonstrate how models incorporating commonly used features to predict college-student success are less accurate when predicting success for racially minoritized students. Common approaches to mitigating algorithmic bias are generally ineffective at eliminating disparities in prediction outcomes and accuracy between racialized groups.
Read more7/12/2024
🎯
0
Reducing the Filtering Effect in Public School Admissions: A Bias-aware Analysis for Targeted Interventions
Yuri Faenza, Swati Gupta, Aapeli Vuorinen, Xuan Zhang
Problem definition: Traditionally, New York City's top 8 public schools have selected candidates solely based on their scores in the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT). These scores are known to be impacted by socioeconomic status of students and test preparation received in middle schools, leading to a massive filtering effect in the education pipeline. The classical mechanisms for assigning students to schools do not naturally address problems like school segregation and class diversity, which have worsened over the years. The scientific community, including policymakers, have reacted by incorporating group-specific quotas and proportionality constraints, with mixed results. The problem of finding effective and fair methods for broadening access to top-notch education is still unsolved. Methodology/results: We take an operations approach to the problem different from most established literature, with the goal of increasing opportunities for students with high economic needs. Using data from the Department of Education (DOE) in New York City, we show that there is a shift in the distribution of scores obtained by students that the DOE classifies as disadvantaged (following criteria mostly based on economic factors). We model this shift as a bias that results from an underestimation of the true potential of disadvantaged students. We analyze the impact this bias has on an assortative matching market. We show that centrally planned interventions can significantly reduce the impact of bias through scholarships or training, when they target the segment of disadvantaged students with average performance.
Read more7/17/2024
✨
0
Impact of Fairness Regulations on Institutions' Policies and Population Qualifications
Hamidreza Montaseri, Amin Gohari
The proliferation of algorithmic systems has fueled discussions surrounding the regulation and control of their social impact. Herein, we consider a system whose primary objective is to maximize utility by selecting the most qualified individuals. To promote demographic parity in the selection algorithm, we consider penalizing discrimination across social groups. We examine conditions under which a discrimination penalty can effectively reduce disparity in the selection. Additionally, we explore the implications of such a penalty when individual qualifications may evolve over time in response to the imposed penalizing policy. We identify scenarios where the penalty could hinder the natural attainment of equity within the population. Moreover, we propose certain conditions that can counteract this undesirable outcome, thus ensuring fairness.
Read more5/21/2024