ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features

Read original: arXiv:2408.01808 - Published 8/6/2024 by Peng Cheng, Yuwei Wang, Peng Huang, Zhongjie Ba, Xiaodong Lin, Feng Lin, Li Lu, Kui Ren
Total Score

0

ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Developed a low-cost adversarial audio attack called ALIF that can fool black-box speech recognition systems using linguistic features
  • Demonstrated ALIF's effectiveness against three popular speech platforms: Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, Amazon Transcribe, and Microsoft Cognitive Services
  • Conducted extensive experiments to evaluate ALIF's performance and compare it to existing adversarial attack methods

Plain English Explanation

ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features presents a new type of adversarial attack that can trick speech recognition systems without needing access to the internal workings of the system.

The key idea is to leverage linguistic features of the speech, rather than making small imperceptible changes to the audio waveform. By carefully modifying the word choice, sentence structure, and other linguistic properties, the researchers were able to craft audio inputs that would be misclassified by popular speech platforms like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft.

This is significant because most existing adversarial attacks require detailed knowledge of the target system's architecture and parameters. In contrast, ALIF works as a "black-box" attack, meaning it can be applied without any insider information about the speech recognition model.

The researchers conducted extensive experiments to evaluate ALIF's performance. They found that it could achieve high success rates in fooling the speech platforms, while only requiring minimal changes to the original audio. This makes ALIF a practical and low-cost attack that could pose a real threat to the security of voice-based systems.

Technical Explanation

The ALIF paper presents a novel approach for crafting adversarial audio attacks against black-box speech recognition systems. Rather than perturbing the audio waveform, the researchers leverage linguistic features to generate adversarial examples.

The key steps of the ALIF attack are:

  1. Linguistic Feature Extraction: The researchers extract a set of linguistic features from the target audio, including word choice, sentence structure, and prosodic cues.
  2. Adversarial Example Generation: Using a gradient-based optimization process, ALIF modifies the linguistic features to create a new audio that will be misclassified by the speech recognition system, while preserving the original semantics and intelligibility.
  3. Audio Synthesis: The modified linguistic features are then used to synthesize the final adversarial audio, which is indistinguishable from the original to human listeners.

The researchers evaluated ALIF against three major speech platforms: Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, Amazon Transcribe, and Microsoft Cognitive Services. Their experiments showed that ALIF could achieve high attack success rates (over 90%) while requiring only minimal changes to the original audio.

ALIF outperformed existing waveform-based adversarial attack methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of leveraging linguistic features for this task. The researchers also analyzed the robustness of ALIF to various defenses, such as audio-to-text rewriting and anti-spoofing techniques.

Critical Analysis

The ALIF paper presents a novel and promising approach for crafting adversarial attacks against black-box speech recognition systems. By focusing on linguistic features rather than the audio waveform, the researchers have developed a practical attack that could pose a significant threat to the security of voice-based systems.

One key strength of ALIF is its black-box nature, which allows it to be applied without any knowledge of the target system's internal architecture or parameters. This makes it a more realistic and scalable attack compared to white-box approaches that require detailed insider information.

However, the paper does not address the potential for users to detect or mitigate the ALIF attack through additional linguistic or prosodic analysis. It would be valuable to explore how speech recognition systems could be made more robust to such linguistically-driven adversarial perturbations.

Additionally, the paper focuses on English-language speech platforms, but it would be important to evaluate the broader applicability of ALIF to other languages and speech recognition systems. The transferability of the attack across different platforms and languages is an area that requires further investigation.

Overall, the ALIF paper makes a significant contribution to the field of adversarial machine learning, particularly in the context of speech recognition security. The linguistic approach is a novel and promising direction that warrants further research and development.

Conclusion

The ALIF paper presents a low-cost adversarial audio attack that can effectively fool popular black-box speech recognition platforms, such as Google Cloud Speech-to-Text, Amazon Transcribe, and Microsoft Cognitive Services. By leveraging linguistic features rather than perturbing the audio waveform, the researchers have developed a practical and scalable attack that could pose a real threat to the security of voice-based systems.

The extensive experiments conducted in the paper demonstrate ALIF's high success rates and its advantages over existing adversarial attack methods. While the paper does not address potential defenses or the broader applicability of the attack, it represents an important step forward in the field of adversarial machine learning, particularly in the context of speech recognition security.

As voice-based interfaces become increasingly ubiquitous, the need to understand and address the security vulnerabilities of speech recognition systems will only grow more pressing. The ALIF paper provides valuable insights and a novel approach that can inform future research and development in this critical area.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features
Total Score

0

ALIF: Low-Cost Adversarial Audio Attacks on Black-Box Speech Platforms using Linguistic Features

Peng Cheng, Yuwei Wang, Peng Huang, Zhongjie Ba, Xiaodong Lin, Feng Lin, Li Lu, Kui Ren

Extensive research has revealed that adversarial examples (AE) pose a significant threat to voice-controllable smart devices. Recent studies have proposed black-box adversarial attacks that require only the final transcription from an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system. However, these attacks typically involve many queries to the ASR, resulting in substantial costs. Moreover, AE-based adversarial audio samples are susceptible to ASR updates. In this paper, we identify the root cause of these limitations, namely the inability to construct AE attack samples directly around the decision boundary of deep learning (DL) models. Building on this observation, we propose ALIF, the first black-box adversarial linguistic feature-based attack pipeline. We leverage the reciprocal process of text-to-speech (TTS) and ASR models to generate perturbations in the linguistic embedding space where the decision boundary resides. Based on the ALIF pipeline, we present the ALIF-OTL and ALIF-OTA schemes for launching attacks in both the digital domain and the physical playback environment on four commercial ASRs and voice assistants. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that ALIF-OTL and -OTA significantly improve query efficiency by 97.7% and 73.3%, respectively, while achieving competitive performance compared to existing methods. Notably, ALIF-OTL can generate an attack sample with only one query. Furthermore, our test-of-time experiment validates the robustness of our approach against ASR updates.

Read more

8/6/2024

Zero-Query Adversarial Attack on Black-box Automatic Speech Recognition Systems
Total Score

0

Zero-Query Adversarial Attack on Black-box Automatic Speech Recognition Systems

Zheng Fang, Tao Wang, Lingchen Zhao, Shenyi Zhang, Bowen Li, Yunjie Ge, Qi Li, Chao Shen, Qian Wang

In recent years, extensive research has been conducted on the vulnerability of ASR systems, revealing that black-box adversarial example attacks pose significant threats to real-world ASR systems. However, most existing black-box attacks rely on queries to the target ASRs, which is impractical when queries are not permitted. In this paper, we propose ZQ-Attack, a transfer-based adversarial attack on ASR systems in the zero-query black-box setting. Through a comprehensive review and categorization of modern ASR technologies, we first meticulously select surrogate ASRs of diverse types to generate adversarial examples. Following this, ZQ-Attack initializes the adversarial perturbation with a scaled target command audio, rendering it relatively imperceptible while maintaining effectiveness. Subsequently, to achieve high transferability of adversarial perturbations, we propose a sequential ensemble optimization algorithm, which iteratively optimizes the adversarial perturbation on each surrogate model, leveraging collaborative information from other models. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate ZQ-Attack. In the over-the-line setting, ZQ-Attack achieves a 100% success rate of attack (SRoA) with an average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 21.91dB on 4 online speech recognition services, and attains an average SRoA of 100% and SNR of 19.67dB on 16 open-source ASRs. For commercial intelligent voice control devices, ZQ-Attack also achieves a 100% SRoA with an average SNR of 15.77dB in the over-the-air setting.

Read more

6/28/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Investigating Causal Cues: Strengthening Spoofed Audio Detection with Human-Discernible Linguistic Features

Zahra Khanjani, Tolulope Ale, Jianwu Wang, Lavon Davis, Christine Mallinson, Vandana P. Janeja

Several types of spoofed audio, such as mimicry, replay attacks, and deepfakes, have created societal challenges to information integrity. Recently, researchers have worked with sociolinguistics experts to label spoofed audio samples with Expert Defined Linguistic Features (EDLFs) that can be discerned by the human ear: pitch, pause, word-initial and word-final release bursts of consonant stops, audible intake or outtake of breath, and overall audio quality. It is established that there is an improvement in several deepfake detection algorithms when they augmented the traditional and common features of audio data with these EDLFs. In this paper, using a hybrid dataset comprised of multiple types of spoofed audio augmented with sociolinguistic annotations, we investigate causal discovery and inferences between the discernible linguistic features and the label in the audio clips, comparing the findings of the causal models with the expert ground truth validation labeling process. Our findings suggest that the causal models indicate the utility of incorporating linguistic features to help discern spoofed audio, as well as the overall need and opportunity to incorporate human knowledge into models and techniques for strengthening AI models. The causal discovery and inference can be used as a foundation of training humans to discern spoofed audio as well as automating EDLFs labeling for the purpose of performance improvement of the common AI-based spoofed audio detectors.

Read more

9/11/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

MLAAD: The Multi-Language Audio Anti-Spoofing Dataset

Nicolas M. Muller, Piotr Kawa, Wei Herng Choong, Edresson Casanova, Eren Golge, Thorsten Muller, Piotr Syga, Philip Sperl, Konstantin Bottinger

Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology brings significant advantages, such as giving a voice to those with speech impairments, but also enables audio deepfakes and spoofs. The former mislead individuals and may propagate misinformation, while the latter undermine voice biometric security systems. AI-based detection can help to address these challenges by automatically differentiating between genuine and fabricated voice recordings. However, these models are only as good as their training data, which currently is severely limited due to an overwhelming concentration on English and Chinese audio in anti-spoofing databases, thus restricting its worldwide effectiveness. In response, this paper presents the Multi-Language Audio Anti-Spoof Dataset (MLAAD), created using 54 TTS models, comprising 21 different architectures, to generate 163.9 hours of synthetic voice in 23 different languages. We train and evaluate three state-of-the-art deepfake detection models with MLAAD, and observe that MLAAD demonstrates superior performance over comparable datasets like InTheWild or FakeOrReal when used as a training resource. Furthermore, in comparison with the renowned ASVspoof 2019 dataset, MLAAD proves to be a complementary resource. In tests across eight datasets, MLAAD and ASVspoof 2019 alternately outperformed each other, both excelling on four datasets. By publishing MLAAD and making trained models accessible via an interactive webserver , we aim to democratize antispoofing technology, making it accessible beyond the realm of specialists, thus contributing to global efforts against audio spoofing and deepfakes.

Read more

4/17/2024