Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2403.03880 - Published 5/24/2024 by Sam Adam-Day, Michael Benedikt, .Ismail .Ilkan Ceylan, Ben Finkelshtein
Total Score

0

Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the convergence properties of graph neural networks (GNNs) and graph transformers, showing that their outputs are almost surely asymptotically constant on random graphs.
  • The authors prove that under certain assumptions, the output of these models becomes constant as the graph size grows, and provide insights into the relationship between the model's expressiveness and this convergence behavior.
  • The findings have implications for understanding the fundamental limitations of GNNs and graph transformers, and provide a novel perspective on the uniform expressiveness of these models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how the outputs of graph neural networks (GNNs) and graph transformers behave as the size of the input graph gets very large. The key finding is that under certain conditions, the output of these models will converge to a constant value, meaning it won't change no matter how big the input graph gets.

This might seem surprising, since you'd expect the output to become more refined and nuanced as the model sees more data. But the authors show that there are mathematical reasons why these models' outputs hit a limit and stop changing, even as the input graphs get arbitrarily large.

This has implications for understanding the strengths and limitations of GNNs and graph transformers. It suggests that while these models can be very powerful, there are fundamental constraints on how much information they can extract from large graphs. The findings provide a new perspective on the uniform expressiveness of these models - the idea that they can represent a wide range of functions, but only up to a point.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of graph neural networks (GNNs) and graph transformers. The authors prove that under certain assumptions, the output of these models becomes asymptotically constant as the size of the input graph grows.

Specifically, the authors consider a setting where the input graphs are drawn from a random graph model, such as the Erdős-Rényi model. They show that under mild conditions on the model parameters, the output of GNNs and graph transformers will converge in distribution to a constant random variable as the graph size goes to infinity.

This convergence result holds for a broad class of GNN and graph transformer architectures, including those with skip connections, residual layers, and attention mechanisms. The authors also provide insights into the relationship between the model's expressiveness and its convergence behavior.

The findings have implications for understanding the fundamental limitations of these models. Even though GNNs and graph transformers are highly expressive and can model complex graph structures, their outputs will eventually become insensitive to the details of the input graph as the graph size grows. This suggests there may be inherent constraints on how much information these models can extract from large graphs.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of GNNs and graph transformers, which is an important contribution to the understanding of these models. The authors make a number of simplifying assumptions, such as the random graph model and the specific form of the message passing functions, which may limit the generality of the results.

Additionally, the paper does not address the practical significance of the convergence behavior. While the asymptotic constant output may be a mathematical curiosity, it's unclear how this would manifest in real-world applications of these models, where the input graphs are often of finite size.

The authors also do not discuss potential ways to mitigate the convergence issue, such as architectural modifications or alternative training procedures. Further research is needed to explore these directions and understand the implications of the findings for the design and application of GNNs and graph transformers.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel theoretical result showing that the outputs of graph neural networks and graph transformers are almost surely asymptotically constant on random graphs. The findings provide insights into the fundamental limitations of these models, suggesting that there are inherent constraints on how much information they can extract from large graphs.

The results have implications for understanding the uniform expressiveness of GNNs and graph transformers, and raise interesting questions about the practical significance of the convergence behavior. Further research is needed to explore the broader implications of these findings and to investigate potential ways to address the identified limitations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks

Sam Adam-Day, Michael Benedikt, .Ismail .Ilkan Ceylan, Ben Finkelshtein

We present a new angle on the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNNs) by studying how the predictions of a GNN probabilistic classifier evolve as we apply it on larger graphs drawn from some random graph model. We show that the output converges to a constant function, which upper-bounds what these classifiers can uniformly express. This strong convergence phenomenon applies to a very wide class of GNNs, including state of the art models, with aggregates including mean and the attention-based mechanism of graph transformers. Our results apply to a broad class of random graph models, including sparse and dense variants of the ErdH{o}s-R'enyi model, the stochastic block model, and the Barab'asi-Albert model. We empirically validate these findings, observing that the convergence phenomenon appears not only on random graphs but also on some real-world graphs.

Read more

5/24/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Convergence of Message Passing Graph Neural Networks with Generic Aggregation On Large Random Graphs

Matthieu Cordonnier, Nicolas Keriven, Nicolas Tremblay, Samuel Vaiter

We study the convergence of message passing graph neural networks on random graph models to their continuous counterpart as the number of nodes tends to infinity. Until now, this convergence was only known for architectures with aggregation functions in the form of normalized means, or, equivalently, of an application of classical operators like the adjacency matrix or the graph Laplacian. We extend such results to a large class of aggregation functions, that encompasses all classically used message passing graph neural networks, such as attention-based message passing, max convolutional message passing, (degree-normalized) convolutional message passing, or moment-based aggregation message passing. Under mild assumptions, we give non-asymptotic bounds with high probability to quantify this convergence. Our main result is based on the McDiarmid inequality. Interestingly, this result does not apply to the case where the aggregation is a coordinate-wise maximum. We treat this case separately and obtain a different convergence rate.

Read more

8/14/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Graph Convolutional Neural Networks Sensitivity under Probabilistic Error Model

Xinjue Wang, Esa Ollila, Sergiy A. Vorobyov

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), particularly Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs), have emerged as pivotal instruments in machine learning and signal processing for processing graph-structured data. This paper proposes an analysis framework to investigate the sensitivity of GCNNs to probabilistic graph perturbations, directly impacting the graph shift operator (GSO). Our study establishes tight expected GSO error bounds, which are explicitly linked to the error model parameters, and reveals a linear relationship between GSO perturbations and the resulting output differences at each layer of GCNNs. This linearity demonstrates that a single-layer GCNN maintains stability under graph edge perturbations, provided that the GSO errors remain bounded, regardless of the perturbation scale. For multilayer GCNNs, the dependency of system's output difference on GSO perturbations is shown to be a recursion of linearity. Finally, we exemplify the framework with the Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN) and Simple Graph Convolution Network (SGCN). Experiments validate our theoretical derivations and the effectiveness of our approach.

Read more

9/10/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Future Directions in the Theory of Graph Machine Learning

Christopher Morris, Fabrizio Frasca, Nadav Dym, Haggai Maron, .Ismail .Ilkan Ceylan, Ron Levie, Derek Lim, Michael Bronstein, Martin Grohe, Stefanie Jegelka

Machine learning on graphs, especially using graph neural networks (GNNs), has seen a surge in interest due to the wide availability of graph data across a broad spectrum of disciplines, from life to social and engineering sciences. Despite their practical success, our theoretical understanding of the properties of GNNs remains highly incomplete. Recent theoretical advancements primarily focus on elucidating the coarse-grained expressive power of GNNs, predominantly employing combinatorial techniques. However, these studies do not perfectly align with practice, particularly in understanding the generalization behavior of GNNs when trained with stochastic first-order optimization techniques. In this position paper, we argue that the graph machine learning community needs to shift its attention to developing a balanced theory of graph machine learning, focusing on a more thorough understanding of the interplay of expressive power, generalization, and optimization.

Read more

6/17/2024