Convergence of Message Passing Graph Neural Networks with Generic Aggregation On Large Random Graphs

Read original: arXiv:2304.11140 - Published 8/14/2024 by Matthieu Cordonnier, Nicolas Keriven, Nicolas Tremblay, Samuel Vaiter
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper examines the convergence of message passing graph neural networks (GNNs) on random graph models to their continuous counterpart as the number of nodes increases.
  • Previous research only showed this convergence for GNN architectures with specific aggregation functions, like normalized means.
  • This paper extends the convergence results to a broader class of aggregation functions, including attention-based, max convolution, and moment-based GNNs.
  • The authors provide non-asymptotic bounds to quantify the convergence, using the McDiarmid inequality.
  • They also treat the case of coordinate-wise maximum aggregation separately, as it requires a different convergence rate.

Plain English Explanation

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that operate on data structured as graphs, rather than the grid-like data that traditional neural networks work with. In a GNN, information is passed between the nodes of the graph, and the model learns to make predictions based on this information flow.

The authors of this paper were interested in understanding how GNNs behave as the size of the graph (the number of nodes) gets very large. They wanted to know if the GNN's predictions would converge to a continuous limit, rather than being affected by the specific structure of the graph.

Previous research had shown this convergence, but only for GNNs that used specific types of information aggregation functions, like taking the average of the neighboring node features. This paper extends those results to a much broader class of aggregation functions, including more advanced ones like attention-based or max-pooling aggregation.

The authors provide mathematical bounds that quantify how quickly the GNN's predictions converge to the continuous limit as the graph size increases. These bounds hold with high probability, meaning they are very likely to be true.

Interestingly, the authors found that the case of using a coordinate-wise maximum as the aggregation function required a different type of analysis and a different convergence rate. They treat this case separately in their paper.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is extending the convergence results for message passing GNNs to a broader class of aggregation functions. Previous work had only shown this convergence for GNNs that used aggregation functions in the form of normalized means, or equivalent to classical operators like the adjacency matrix or graph Laplacian.

The authors show that this convergence holds for a much larger class of aggregation functions, including attention-based message passing, max convolutional message passing, (degree-normalized) convolutional message passing, and moment-based aggregation message passing. This encompasses most of the commonly used message passing GNN architectures.

To prove this convergence, the authors rely on the McDiarmid inequality, a powerful tool from probability theory that allows them to obtain non-asymptotic high-probability bounds. This means they can quantify how quickly the GNN predictions converge to the continuous limit as the number of nodes grows, rather than just showing that the convergence happens in the limit.

Interestingly, the authors find that the case of using a coordinate-wise maximum as the aggregation function does not fit into the general framework based on the McDiarmid inequality. For this case, they develop a separate analysis and obtain a different convergence rate.

Critical Analysis

The main strength of this paper is the generalization of the convergence results for message passing GNNs to a much broader class of aggregation functions. This is an important theoretical contribution, as it shows that the previously known convergence properties are not limited to a narrow set of architectures, but hold more widely.

That said, the paper does not address some potential limitations or caveats. For example, the assumptions required for the convergence bounds, such as boundedness of the node features and aggregation functions, may not always hold in practice. It would be interesting to see if the results can be extended to relaxed assumptions or alternative modeling approaches.

Additionally, the separate treatment of the coordinate-wise maximum aggregation case suggests that there may be other "edge cases" or architectural choices that require specialized analysis. Understanding the full range of GNN behaviors as the graph size grows is an important area for further research.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the theoretical understanding of message passing GNNs, but there is still more work to be done to fully characterize their convergence properties and robustness across different settings.

Conclusion

This paper extends the known convergence results for message passing graph neural networks (GNNs) on random graph models to their continuous counterpart. The authors show that this convergence holds not just for GNNs with specific aggregation functions, but for a much broader class of architectures, including attention-based, max-pooling, and moment-based GNNs.

By providing non-asymptotic high-probability bounds on the convergence rate, the paper offers a more quantitative understanding of how GNN predictions behave as the graph size grows very large. This is an important theoretical contribution that enhances our knowledge of the fundamental properties of this increasingly popular class of machine learning models.

While the paper does not address all potential limitations, it represents a significant step forward in characterizing the convergence of message passing GNNs, with implications for their theoretical analysis and practical applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Convergence of Message Passing Graph Neural Networks with Generic Aggregation On Large Random Graphs

Matthieu Cordonnier, Nicolas Keriven, Nicolas Tremblay, Samuel Vaiter

We study the convergence of message passing graph neural networks on random graph models to their continuous counterpart as the number of nodes tends to infinity. Until now, this convergence was only known for architectures with aggregation functions in the form of normalized means, or, equivalently, of an application of classical operators like the adjacency matrix or the graph Laplacian. We extend such results to a large class of aggregation functions, that encompasses all classically used message passing graph neural networks, such as attention-based message passing, max convolutional message passing, (degree-normalized) convolutional message passing, or moment-based aggregation message passing. Under mild assumptions, we give non-asymptotic bounds with high probability to quantify this convergence. Our main result is based on the McDiarmid inequality. Interestingly, this result does not apply to the case where the aggregation is a coordinate-wise maximum. We treat this case separately and obtain a different convergence rate.

Read more

8/14/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Generalization Bounds for Message Passing Networks on Mixture of Graphons

Sohir Maskey, Gitta Kutyniok, Ron Levie

We study the generalization capabilities of Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs), a prevalent class of Graph Neural Networks (GNN). We derive generalization bounds specifically for MPNNs with normalized sum aggregation and mean aggregation. Our analysis is based on a data generation model incorporating a finite set of template graphons. Each graph within this framework is generated by sampling from one of the graphons with a certain degree of perturbation. In particular, we extend previous MPNN generalization results to a more realistic setting, which includes the following modifications: 1) we analyze simple random graphs with Bernoulli-distributed edges instead of weighted graphs; 2) we sample both graphs and graph signals from perturbed graphons instead of clean graphons; and 3) we analyze sparse graphs instead of dense graphs. In this more realistic and challenging scenario, we provide a generalization bound that decreases as the average number of nodes in the graphs increases. Our results imply that MPNNs with higher complexity than the size of the training set can still generalize effectively, as long as the graphs are sufficiently large.

Read more

4/5/2024

Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Almost Surely Asymptotically Constant Graph Neural Networks

Sam Adam-Day, Michael Benedikt, .Ismail .Ilkan Ceylan, Ben Finkelshtein

We present a new angle on the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNNs) by studying how the predictions of a GNN probabilistic classifier evolve as we apply it on larger graphs drawn from some random graph model. We show that the output converges to a constant function, which upper-bounds what these classifiers can uniformly express. This strong convergence phenomenon applies to a very wide class of GNNs, including state of the art models, with aggregates including mean and the attention-based mechanism of graph transformers. Our results apply to a broad class of random graph models, including sparse and dense variants of the ErdH{o}s-R'enyi model, the stochastic block model, and the Barab'asi-Albert model. We empirically validate these findings, observing that the convergence phenomenon appears not only on random graphs but also on some real-world graphs.

Read more

5/24/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Generalization Error of Graph Neural Networks in the Mean-field Regime

Gholamali Aminian, Yixuan He, Gesine Reinert, {L}ukasz Szpruch, Samuel N. Cohen

This work provides a theoretical framework for assessing the generalization error of graph neural networks in the over-parameterized regime, where the number of parameters surpasses the quantity of data points. We explore two widely utilized types of graph neural networks: graph convolutional neural networks and message passing graph neural networks. Prior to this study, existing bounds on the generalization error in the over-parametrized regime were uninformative, limiting our understanding of over-parameterized network performance. Our novel approach involves deriving upper bounds within the mean-field regime for evaluating the generalization error of these graph neural networks. We establish upper bounds with a convergence rate of $O(1/n)$, where $n$ is the number of graph samples. These upper bounds offer a theoretical assurance of the networks' performance on unseen data in the challenging over-parameterized regime and overall contribute to our understanding of their performance.

Read more

7/2/2024