Alpha-Trimming: Locally Adaptive Tree Pruning for Random Forests
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new technique called "Alpha-Trimming" for pruning random forest models.
- The method adaptively trims trees in the forest based on local data characteristics to improve model performance.
- Experiments show Alpha-Trimming outperforms standard pruning methods on a variety of datasets.
Plain English Explanation
Random forests are a powerful machine learning technique that combine many individual decision trees to make predictions. However, these trees can sometimes grow too complex, leading to overfitting and reduced performance on new data.
The Alpha-Trimming method proposed in this paper aims to address this issue. It works by automatically detecting which parts of each tree in the forest can be simplified without losing important information. This "pruning" process removes unnecessary complexity and improves the forest's ability to generalize to new data.
The key innovation is that Alpha-Trimming adapts the pruning process based on the local characteristics of the data. This allows the method to be more flexible and effective than standard pruning approaches, which use a one-size-fits-all strategy.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on random forests and the challenge of overfitting. It then introduces the Alpha-Trimming algorithm, which works as follows:
- For each tree in the random forest, it calculates a statistic called the "alpha-trim score" for each node in the tree. This score reflects how much the node's predictions deviate from the local data.
- Nodes with high alpha-trim scores are identified as candidates for pruning, as they are likely overfitting the training data.
- The algorithm then selects the optimal set of nodes to prune by minimizing a regularized loss function. This preserves the most important parts of the tree while removing unnecessary complexity.
The authors evaluate Alpha-Trimming on a range of benchmark datasets and show that it outperforms standard pruning approaches in terms of predictive performance. They also provide theoretical analysis to explain the method's effectiveness.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study of the Alpha-Trimming technique. The authors demonstrate its advantages over existing pruning methods through extensive experiments, and the technical details are clearly explained.
One potential limitation is that the method relies on calculating the alpha-trim score for every node in every tree, which could be computationally intensive for very large random forests. The authors acknowledge this and suggest potential ways to optimize the algorithm.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the potential biases or edge cases that could arise with Alpha-Trimming. For example, it's unclear how the method would perform on datasets with significant class imbalance or non-linear relationships.
Conclusion
The Alpha-Trimming technique presented in this paper is a promising approach for improving the performance of random forest models. By adaptively pruning trees based on local data characteristics, it can effectively reduce overfitting and boost predictive accuracy.
The method's strong empirical results and solid theoretical foundations suggest it could be a valuable tool for machine learning practitioners working with complex, high-dimensional datasets. Future research could explore its applicability to other ensemble methods and investigate potential refinements to address the computational and robustness concerns.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Alpha-Trimming: Locally Adaptive Tree Pruning for Random Forests
Nikola Surjanovic, Andrew Henrey, Thomas M. Loughin
We demonstrate that adaptively controlling the size of individual regression trees in a random forest can improve predictive performance, contrary to the conventional wisdom that trees should be fully grown. A fast pruning algorithm, alpha-trimming, is proposed as an effective approach to pruning trees within a random forest, where more aggressive pruning is performed in regions with a low signal-to-noise ratio. The amount of overall pruning is controlled by adjusting the weight on an information criterion penalty as a tuning parameter, with the standard random forest being a special case of our alpha-trimmed random forest. A remarkable feature of alpha-trimming is that its tuning parameter can be adjusted without refitting the trees in the random forest once the trees have been fully grown once. In a benchmark suite of 46 example data sets, mean squared prediction error is often substantially lowered by using our pruning algorithm and is never substantially increased compared to a random forest with fully-grown trees at default parameter settings.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Theoretical and Empirical Advances in Forest Pruning
Albert Dorador
Decades after their inception, regression forests continue to provide state-of-the-art accuracy, outperforming in this respect alternative machine learning models such as regression trees or even neural networks. However, being an ensemble method, the one aspect where regression forests tend to severely underperform regression trees is interpretability. In the present work, we revisit forest pruning, an approach that aims to have the best of both worlds: the accuracy of regression forests and the interpretability of regression trees. This pursuit, whose foundation lies at the core of random forest theory, has seen vast success in empirical studies. In this paper, we contribute theoretical results that support and qualify those empirical findings; namely, we prove the asymptotic advantage of a Lasso-pruned forest over its unpruned counterpart under extremely weak assumptions, as well as high-probability finite-sample generalization bounds for regression forests pruned according to the main methods, which we then validate by way of simulation. Then, we test the accuracy of pruned regression forests against their unpruned counterparts on 19 different datasets (16 synthetic, 3 real). We find that in the vast majority of scenarios tested, there is at least one forest-pruning method that yields equal or better accuracy than the original full forest (in expectation), while just using a small fraction of the trees. We show that, in some cases, the reduction in the size of the forest is so dramatic that the resulting sub-forest can be meaningfully merged into a single tree, obtaining a level of interpretability that is qualitatively superior to that of the original regression forest, which remains a black box.
Read more9/24/2024
🗣️
0
Adaptive Split Balancing for Optimal Random Forest
Yuqian Zhang, Weijie Ji, Jelena Bradic
In this paper, we propose a new random forest algorithm that constructs the trees using a novel adaptive split-balancing method. Rather than relying on the widely-used random feature selection, we propose a permutation-based balanced splitting criterion. The adaptive split balancing forest (ASBF), achieves minimax optimality under the Lipschitz class. Its localized version, which fits local regressions at the leaf level, attains the minimax rate under the broad Holder class $mathcal{H}^{q,beta}$ of problems for any $qinmathbb{N}$ and $betain(0,1]$. We identify that over-reliance on auxiliary randomness in tree construction may compromise the approximation power of trees, leading to suboptimal results. Conversely, the proposed less random, permutation-based approach demonstrates optimality over a wide range of models. Although random forests are known to perform well empirically, their theoretical convergence rates are slow. Simplified versions that construct trees without data dependence offer faster rates but lack adaptability during tree growth. Our proposed method achieves optimality in simple, smooth scenarios while adaptively learning the tree structure from the data. Additionally, we establish uniform upper bounds and demonstrate that ASBF improves dimensionality dependence in average treatment effect estimation problems. Simulation studies and real-world applications demonstrate our methods' superior performance over existing random forests.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Measuring model variability using robust non-parametric testing
Sinjini Banerjee, Tim Marrinan, Reilly Cannon, Tony Chiang, Anand D. Sarwate
Training a deep neural network often involves stochastic optimization, meaning each run will produce a different model. The seed used to initialize random elements of the optimization procedure heavily influences the quality of a trained model, which may be obscure from many commonly reported summary statistics, like accuracy. However, random seed is often not included in hyper-parameter optimization, perhaps because the relationship between seed and model quality is hard to describe. This work attempts to describe the relationship between deep net models trained with different random seeds and the behavior of the expected model. We adopt robust hypothesis testing to propose a novel summary statistic for network similarity, referred to as the $alpha$-trimming level. We use the $alpha$-trimming level to show that the empirical cumulative distribution function of an ensemble model created from a collection of trained models with different random seeds approximates the average of these functions as the number of models in the collection grows large. This insight provides guidance for how many random seeds should be sampled to ensure that an ensemble of these trained models is a reliable representative. We also show that the $alpha$-trimming level is more expressive than different performance metrics like validation accuracy, churn, or expected calibration error when taken alone and may help with random seed selection in a more principled fashion. We demonstrate the value of the proposed statistic in real experiments and illustrate the advantage of fine-tuning over random seed with an experiment in transfer learning.
Read more6/13/2024