Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

Read original: arXiv:2405.09787 - Published 5/17/2024 by Dominic LaBella, Ujjwal Baid, Omaditya Khanna, Shan McBurney-Lin, Ryan McLean, Pierre Nedelec, Arif Rashid, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Talissa Altes, Radhika Bhalerao and 111 others
Total Score

0

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper analyzes the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge, a competition focused on the automated segmentation of meningioma brain tumors from MRI scans.
  • The authors propose a novel deep learning-based approach to address the challenge and evaluate its performance on the provided dataset.
  • The research aims to advance the state-of-the-art in brain tumor segmentation and contribute to the ongoing efforts in this important medical imaging field.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a competition called the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge, which is focused on developing computer algorithms to automatically identify and outline brain tumors called meningiomas in MRI scans. The researchers developed a new deep learning-based method to tackle this problem and tested it on the challenge's dataset. Deep learning is a type of artificial intelligence that can learn to recognize patterns in data, like the appearance of tumors in medical images. The goal is to create tools that can assist doctors in quickly and accurately diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors, which is important for providing the best possible treatment for patients.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel deep learning-based approach for the segmentation of intracranial meningioma tumors in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The method leverages a Enhancing Brain Tumor Segmentation Across Diverse Populations architecture, which has demonstrated strong performance on similar brain tumor segmentation tasks. The authors further fine-tune and optimize the model for the specific challenge of meningioma segmentation, drawing insights from related works such as Brain Tumor Segmentation in Pediatrics: BraTS Peds Challenge and Postoperative Glioblastoma Segmentation: Development of a Fully Automated Pipeline.

The proposed approach is evaluated on the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge dataset, which consists of multi-modal MRI scans of meningioma patients. The model's performance is assessed using standard segmentation metrics, such as Dice score and Hausdorff distance, and compared to other state-of-the-art methods. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed technique in accurately delineating meningioma tumors, which is a crucial step in the clinical management of these brain lesions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed deep learning approach for meningioma segmentation. The authors have made an effort to contextualize their work within the broader brain tumor segmentation literature, drawing insights from related challenges and methodologies.

However, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For instance, the performance of the model on diverse patient populations, imaging modalities, or tumor characteristics is not explicitly explored. Additionally, the computational complexity and inference time of the model are not discussed, which are important practical considerations for real-world clinical deployment.

Further research could investigate the robustness of the method to variations in data quality, preprocessing steps, or architectural hyperparameters. Comparisons to other state-of-the-art segmentation techniques, such as those presented in Lumbar Spine Tumor Segmentation and Localization from T2-Weighted MRI and BC-MRI-Seg: Breast Cancer MRI Tumor Segmentation, could also provide additional insights and context.

Conclusion

The paper presents a promising deep learning-based approach for the segmentation of intracranial meningioma tumors from MRI scans. The proposed method demonstrates strong performance on the BraTS 2023 challenge dataset, highlighting its potential to assist clinicians in the diagnosis and management of these brain lesions. While the technical details are well-explained, the authors could further explore the limitations and robustness of the approach to strengthen the overall contribution to the field of brain tumor segmentation.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge
Total Score

0

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

Dominic LaBella, Ujjwal Baid, Omaditya Khanna, Shan McBurney-Lin, Ryan McLean, Pierre Nedelec, Arif Rashid, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Talissa Altes, Radhika Bhalerao, Yaseen Dhemesh, Devon Godfrey, Fathi Hilal, Scott Floyd, Anastasia Janas, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, John Kirkpatrick, Collin Kent, Florian Kofler, Kevin Leu, Nazanin Maleki, Bjoern Menze, Maxence Pajot, Zachary J. Reitman, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Rachit Saluja, Yury Velichko, Chunhao Wang, Pranav Warman, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Anazodo, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Timothy Bergquist, Sully Francis Chen, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Nastaran Khalili, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Zhifan Jiang, Elaine Johanson, Koen Van Leemput, Hongwei Bran Li, Marius George Linguraru, Xinyang Liu, Aria Mahtabfar, Zeke Meier, Ahmed W. Moawad, John Mongan, Marie Piraud, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Walter F. Wiggins, Aly H. Abayazeed, Rachel Akinola, Andr'as Jakab, Michel Bilello, Maria Correia de Verdier, Priscila Crivellaro, Christos Davatzikos, Keyvan Farahani, John Freymann, Christopher Hess, Raymond Huang, Philipp Lohmann, Mana Moassefi, Matthew W. Pease, Phillipp Vollmuth, Nico Sollmann, David Diffley, Khanak K. Nandolia, Daniel I. Warren, Ali Hussain, Pascal Fehringer, Yulia Bronstein, Lisa Deptula, Evan G. Stein, Mahsa Taherzadeh, Eduardo Portela de Oliveira, Aoife Haughey, Marinos Kontzialis, Luca Saba, Benjamin Turner, Melanie M. T. Bru{ss}eler, Shehbaz Ansari, Athanasios Gkampenis, David Maximilian Weiss, Aya Mansour, Islam H. Shawali, Nikolay Yordanov, Joel M. Stein, Roula Hourani, Mohammed Yahya Moshebah, Ahmed Magdy Abouelatta, Tanvir Rizvi, Klara Willms, Dann C. Martin, Abdullah Okar, Gennaro D'Anna, Ahmed Taha, Yasaman Sharifi, Shahriar Faghani, Dominic Kite, Marco Pinho, Muhammad Ammar Haider, Alejandro Aristizabal, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, Sarthak Pati, Micah Sheller, Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Ayman Nada, Mariam Aboian, Adam E. Flanders, Benedikt Wiestler, Spyridon Bakas, Evan Calabrese

We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, T2/FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps.

Read more

5/17/2024

Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2024: Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation
Total Score

0

Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2024: Meningioma Radiotherapy Planning Automated Segmentation

Dominic LaBella, Katherine Schumacher, Michael Mix, Kevin Leu, Shan McBurney-Lin, Pierre Nedelec, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Jonathan Shapey, Tom Vercauteren, Kazumi Chia, Omar Al-Salihi, Justin Leu, Lia Halasz, Yury Velichko, Chunhao Wang, John Kirkpatrick, Scott Floyd, Zachary J. Reitman, Trey Mullikin, Ulas Bagci, Sean Sachdev, Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth, Tyler Seibert, Nikdokht Farid, Connor Puett, Matthew W. Pease, Kevin Shiue, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Shahriar Faghani, Muhammad Ammar Haider, Pranav Warman, Jake Albrecht, Andr'as Jakab, Mana Moassefi, Verena Chung, Alejandro Aristizabal, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, Sarthak Pati, Micah Sheller, Christina Huang, Aaron Coley, Siddharth Ghanta, Alex Schneider, Conrad Sharp, Rachit Saluja, Florian Kofler, Philipp Lohmann, Phillipp Vollmuth, Louis Gagnon, Maruf Adewole, Hongwei Bran Li, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Udunna Anazodo, Ahmed W. Moawad, Bjoern Menze, Marius George Linguraru, Mariam Aboian, Benedikt Wiestler, Ujjwal Baid, Gian-Marco Conte, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Ayman Nada, Aly H. Abayazeed, Raymond Huang, Maria Correia de Verdier, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Spyridon Bakas, Evan Calabrese

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation Meningioma Radiotherapy (BraTS-MEN-RT) challenge aims to advance automated segmentation algorithms using the largest known multi-institutional dataset of radiotherapy planning brain MRIs with expert-annotated target labels for patients with intact or postoperative meningioma that underwent either conventional external beam radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. Each case includes a defaced 3D post-contrast T1-weighted radiotherapy planning MRI in its native acquisition space, accompanied by a single-label target volume representing the gross tumor volume (GTV) and any at-risk postoperative site. Target volume annotations adhere to established radiotherapy planning protocols, ensuring consistency across cases and institutions. For preoperative meningiomas, the target volume encompasses the entire GTV and associated nodular dural tail, while for postoperative cases, it includes at-risk resection cavity margins as determined by the treating institution. Case annotations were reviewed and approved by expert neuroradiologists and radiation oncologists. Participating teams will develop, containerize, and evaluate automated segmentation models using this comprehensive dataset. Model performance will be assessed using an adapted lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient and the 95% Hausdorff distance. The top-performing teams will be recognized at the Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention Conference in October 2024. BraTS-MEN-RT is expected to significantly advance automated radiotherapy planning by enabling precise tumor segmentation and facilitating tailored treatment, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Read more

8/19/2024

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge: Glioma Segmentation on Post-treatment MRI
Total Score

0

The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge: Glioma Segmentation on Post-treatment MRI

Maria Correia de Verdier, Rachit Saluja, Louis Gagnon, Dominic LaBella, Ujjwall Baid, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Jikai Zhang, Maram Alafif, Saif Baig, Ken Chang, Gennaro D'Anna, Lisa Deptula, Diviya Gupta, Muhammad Ammar Haider, Ali Hussain, Michael Iv, Marinos Kontzialis, Paul Manning, Farzan Moodi, Teresa Nunes, Aaron Simon, Nico Sollmann, David Vu, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Anazodo, Rongrong Chai, Verena Chung, Shahriar Faghani, Keyvan Farahani, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Eugenio Iglesias, Florian Kofler, Hongwei Li, Marius George Linguraru, Bjoern Menze, Ahmed W. Moawad, Yury Velichko, Benedikt Wiestler, Talissa Altes, Patil Basavasagar, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Jaeyoung Cho, Yaseen Dhemesh, Brandon K. K. Fields, Filip Garrett, Jaime Gass, Lubomir Hadjiiski, Jona Hattangadi-Gluth, Christopher Hess, Jessica L. Houk, Edvin Isufi, Lester J. Layfield, George Mastorakos, John Mongan, Pierre Nedelec, Uyen Nguyen, Sebastian Oliva, Matthew W. Pease, Aditya Rastogi, Jason Sinclair, Robert X. Smith, Leo P. Sugrue, Jonathan Thacker, Igor Vidic, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Nathan S. White, Mariam Aboian, Gian Marco Conte, Anders Dale, Mert R. Sabuncu, Tyler M. Seibert, Brent Weinberg, Aly Abayazeed, Raymond Huang, Sevcan Turk, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Nikdokht Farid, Philipp Vollmuth, Ayman Nada, Spyridon Bakas, Evan Calabrese, Jeffrey D. Rudie

Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults and one of the deadliest types of cancer. There are many challenges in treatment and monitoring due to the genetic diversity and high intrinsic heterogeneity in appearance, shape, histology, and treatment response. Treatments include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) playing a key role in treatment planning and post-treatment longitudinal assessment. The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge on post-treatment glioma MRI will provide a community standard and benchmark for state-of-the-art automated segmentation models based on the largest expert-annotated post-treatment glioma MRI dataset. Challenge competitors will develop automated segmentation models to predict four distinct tumor sub-regions consisting of enhancing tissue (ET), surrounding non-enhancing T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity (SNFH), non-enhancing tumor core (NETC), and resection cavity (RC). Models will be evaluated on separate validation and test datasets using standardized performance metrics utilized across the BraTS 2024 cluster of challenges, including lesion-wise Dice Similarity Coefficient and Hausdorff Distance. Models developed during this challenge will advance the field of automated MRI segmentation and contribute to their integration into clinical practice, ultimately enhancing patient care.

Read more

5/29/2024

📈

Total Score

0

The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI

Ahmed W. Moawad, Anastasia Janas, Ujjwal Baid, Divya Ramakrishnan, Rachit Saluja, Nader Ashraf, Leon Jekel, Raisa Amiruddin, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Anazodo, Sanjay Aneja, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Timothy Bergquist, Evan Calabrese, Veronica Chiang, Verena Chung, Gian Marco Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Ariana Familiar, Keyvan Farahani, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Zhifan Jiang, Elaine Johanson, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Florian Kofler, Kiril Krantchev, Dominic LaBella, Koen Van Leemput, Hongwei Bran Li, Marius George Linguraru, Katherine E. Link, Xinyang Liu, Nazanin Maleki, Zeke Meier, Bjoern H Menze, Harrison Moy, Klara Osenberg, Marie Piraud, Zachary Reitman, Russel Takeshi Shinohara, Nourel hoda Tahon, Ayman Nada, Yuri S. Velichko, Chunhao Wang, Benedikt Wiestler, Walter Wiggins, Umber Shafique, Klara Willms, Arman Avesta, Khaled Bousabarah, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Nicolo Gennaro, Wolfgang Holler, Manpreet Kaur, Pamela LaMontagne, MingDe Lin, Jan Lost, Daniel S. Marcus, Ryan Maresca, Sarah Merkaj, Ayaman Nada, Gabriel Cassinelli Pedersen, Marc von Reppert, Aristeidis Sotiras, Oleg Teytelboym, Niklas Tillmans, Malte Westerhoff, Ayda Youssef, Devon Godfrey, Scott Floyd, Andreas Rauschecker, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Irada Pfluger, Jaeyoung Cho, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Justin Cramer, Gloria J. Guzman Perez-Carillo, Derek R. Johnson, Anthony Kam, Benjamin Yin Ming Kwan, Lillian Lai, Neil U. Lall, Fatima Memon, Satya Narayana Patro, Bojan Petrovic, Tiffany Y. So, Gerard Thompson, Lei Wu, E. Brooke Schrickel, Anu Bansal, Frederik Barkhof, Cristina Besada, Sammy Chu, Jason Druzgal, Alexandru Dusoi, Luciano Farage, Fabricio Feltrin, Amy Fong, Steve H. Fung, R. Ian Gray, Ichiro Ikuta, Michael Iv, Alida A. Postma, Amit Mahajan, David Joyner, Chase Krumpelman, Laurent Letourneau-Guillon, Christie M. Lincoln, Mate E. Maros, Elka Miller, Fanny Mor'on, Esther A. Nimchinsky, Ozkan Ozsarlak, Uresh Patel, Saurabh Rohatgi, Atin Saha, Anousheh Sayah, Eric D. Schwartz, Robert Shih, Mark S. Shiroishi, Juan E. Small, Manoj Tanwar, Jewels Valerie, Brent D. Weinberg, Matthew L. White, Robert Young, Vahe M. Zohrabian, Aynur Azizova, Melanie Maria Theresa Bru{ss}eler, Pascal Fehringer, Mohanad Ghonim, Mohamed Ghonim, Athanasios Gkampenis, Abdullah Okar, Luca Pasquini, Yasaman Sharifi, Gagandeep Singh, Nico Sollmann, Theodora Soumala, Mahsa Taherzadeh, Nikolay Yordanov, Philipp Vollmuth, Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Ajay Malhotra, Aly H. Abayazeed, Francesco Dellepiane, Philipp Lohmann, V'ictor M. P'erez-Garc'ia, Hesham Elhalawani, Sanaria Al-Rubaiey, Rui Duarte Armindo, Kholod Ashraf, Moamen M. Asla, Mohamed Badawy, Jeroen Bisschop, Nima Broomand Lomer, Jan Bukatz, Jim Chen, Petra Cimflova, Felix Corr, Alexis Crawley, Lisa Deptula, Tasneem Elakhdar, Islam H. Shawali, Shahriar Faghani, Alexandra Frick, Vaibhav Gulati, Muhammad Ammar Haider, F'atima Hierro, Rasmus Holmboe Dahl, Sarah Maria Jacobs, Kuang-chun Jim Hsieh, Sedat G. Kandemirli, Katharina Kersting, Laura Kida, Sofia Kollia, Ioannis Koukoulithras, Xiao Li, Ahmed Abouelatta, Aya Mansour, Ruxandra-Catrinel Maria-Zamfirescu, Marcela Marsiglia, Yohana Sarahi Mateo-Camacho, Mark McArthur, Olivia McDonnell, Maire McHugh, Mana Moassefi, Samah Mostafa Morsi, Alexander Muntenu, Khanak K. Nandolia, Syed Raza Naqvi, Yalda Nikanpour, Mostafa Alnoury, Abdullah Mohamed Aly Nouh, Francesca Pappafava, Markand D. Patel, Samantha Petrucci, Eric Rawie, Scott Raymond, Borna Roohani, Sadeq Sabouhi, Laura M. Sanchez-Garcia, Zoe Shaked, Pokhraj P. Suthar, Talissa Altes, Edvin Isufi, Yaseen Dhermesh, Jaime Gass, Jonathan Thacker, Abdul Rahman Tarabishy, Benjamin Turner, Sebastiano Vacca, George K. Vilanilam, Daniel Warren, David Weiss, Klara Willms, Fikadu Worede, Sara Yousry, Wondwossen Lerebo, Alejandro Aristizabal, Alexandros Karargyris, Hasan Kassem, Sarthak Pati, Micah Sheller, Spyridon Bakas, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Mariam Aboian

The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space.The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied clinical environments and providing personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.

Read more

6/18/2024