Analysis of Diagnostics (Part II): Prevalence, Linear Independence, and Unsupervised Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the prevalence, linear independence, and unsupervised learning aspects of diagnostics.
- The key questions addressed include understanding the impact of prevalence on diagnostic performance, assessing the linear independence of diagnostic features, and exploring unsupervised learning techniques for diagnostics.
- The paper provides technical and empirical insights to advance the state of the art in diagnostic testing and analysis.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines several important considerations in the field of diagnostic testing. First, it looks at how the underlying prevalence of a condition or disease can impact the performance of diagnostic tests. This is an important link because the prevalence in the real world may differ from the prevalence assumed during test development, which can lead to unexpected results.
Next, the paper investigates the concept of linear independence between different diagnostic features or markers. Linear independence means that the features provide distinct and non-overlapping information. Understanding linear independence is crucial for designing effective diagnostic panels that capture a wide range of relevant information.
Finally, the paper explores the use of unsupervised learning techniques for diagnostic applications. Unsupervised learning allows patterns and insights to emerge from the data itself, without relying on pre-defined labels or categories. This can be valuable for uncovering previously unknown subtypes or subgroups within a population that may have implications for personalized diagnostics and treatment.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by analyzing the impact of disease prevalence on the performance of diagnostic tests. The authors provide a technical framework for understanding how prevalence affects metrics like sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. This is an important consideration, as the actual prevalence in the real-world setting may differ from the prevalence assumed during the development of the diagnostic test.
The researchers then investigate the linear independence of diagnostic features or biomarkers. They present analytical results on how to assess the linear independence of features, which is crucial for designing effective diagnostic panels that capture diverse and complementary information.
Finally, the paper explores the application of unsupervised learning techniques to diagnostic problems. The authors demonstrate how unsupervised methods can uncover hidden subgroups or subtypes within a population, which can have important implications for personalized diagnostics and treatment strategies. They also discuss the challenges and considerations in applying unsupervised learning to diagnostic data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and technically sound examination of several key aspects of diagnostic testing and analysis. The authors have carefully considered the impact of prevalence, the importance of feature independence, and the potential of unsupervised learning techniques in this domain.
One potential limitation is the reliance on simulated or synthetic data in some of the experiments. While this approach allows for controlled investigations, it would be valuable to see the authors validate their findings on real-world diagnostic datasets to ensure the insights translate to practical applications.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the societal and ethical implications of these diagnostic techniques, such as the potential for bias, the responsible use of personalized diagnostics, and the privacy concerns surrounding patient data. Further exploration of these important considerations would strengthen the overall analysis.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable contribution to the field of diagnostic testing and analysis. By examining the prevalence, linear independence, and unsupervised learning aspects of diagnostics, the authors provide a comprehensive and technically sound framework for understanding and improving diagnostic systems. The insights presented in this work have the potential to inform the development of more accurate, personalized, and clinically-relevant diagnostic tools, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and healthcare decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Analysis of Diagnostics (Part II): Prevalence, Linear Independence, and Unsupervised Learning
Paul N. Patrone, Raquel A. Binder, Catherine S. Forconi, Ann M. Moormann, Anthony J. Kearsley
This is the second manuscript in a two-part series that uses diagnostic testing to understand the connection between prevalence (i.e. number of elements in a class), uncertainty quantification (UQ), and classification theory. Part I considered the context of supervised machine learning (ML) and established a duality between prevalence and the concept of relative conditional probability. The key idea of that analysis was to train a family of discriminative classifiers by minimizing a sum of prevalence-weighted empirical risk functions. The resulting outputs can be interpreted as relative probability level-sets, which thereby yield uncertainty estimates in the class labels. This procedure also demonstrated that certain discriminative and generative ML models are equivalent. Part II considers the extent to which these results can be extended to tasks in unsupervised learning through recourse to ideas in linear algebra. We first observe that the distribution of an impure population, for which the class of a corresponding sample is unknown, can be parameterized in terms of a prevalence. This motivates us to introduce the concept of linearly independent populations, which have different but unknown prevalence values. Using this, we identify an isomorphism between classifiers defined in terms of impure and pure populations. In certain cases, this also leads to a nonlinear system of equations whose solution yields the prevalence values of the linearly independent populations, fully realizing unsupervised learning as a generalization of supervised learning. We illustrate our methods in the context of synthetic data and a research-use-only SARS-CoV-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Read more8/30/2024
📉
0
Analysis of Diagnostics (Part I): Prevalence, Uncertainty Quantification, and Machine Learning
Paul N. Patrone, Raquel A. Binder, Catherine S. Forconi, Ann M. Moormann, Anthony J. Kearsley
Diagnostic testing provides a unique setting for studying and developing tools in classification theory. In such contexts, the concept of prevalence, i.e. the number of individuals with a given condition, is fundamental, both as an inherent quantity of interest and as a parameter that controls classification accuracy. This manuscript is the first in a two-part series that studies deeper connections between classification theory and prevalence, showing how the latter establishes a more complete theory of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for certain types of machine learning (ML). We motivate this analysis via a lemma demonstrating that general classifiers minimizing a prevalence-weighted error contain the same probabilistic information as Bayes-optimal classifiers, which depend on conditional probability densities. This leads us to study relative probability level-sets $B^star (q)$, which are reinterpreted as both classification boundaries and useful tools for quantifying uncertainty in class labels. To realize this in practice, we also propose a numerical, homotopy algorithm that estimates the $B^star (q)$ by minimizing a prevalence-weighted empirical error. The successes and shortcomings of this method motivate us to revisit properties of the level sets, and we deduce the corresponding classifiers obey a useful monotonicity property that stabilizes the numerics and points to important extensions to UQ of ML. Throughout, we validate our methods in the context of synthetic data and a research-use-only SARS-CoV-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay.
Read more8/29/2024
0
Machine learning augmented diagnostic testing to identify sources of variability in test performance
Christopher J. Banks, Aeron Sanchez, Vicki Stewart, Kate Bowen, Graham Smith, Rowland R. Kao
Diagnostic tests which can detect pre-clinical or sub-clinical infection, are one of the most powerful tools in our armoury of weapons to control infectious diseases. Considerable effort has been therefore paid to improving diagnostic testing for human, plant and animal diseases, including strategies for targeting the use of diagnostic tests towards individuals who are more likely to be infected. Here, we follow other recent proposals to further refine this concept, by using machine learning to assess the situational risk under which a diagnostic test is applied to augment its interpretation . We develop this to predict the occurrence of breakdowns of cattle herds due to bovine tuberculosis, exploiting the availability of exceptionally detailed testing records. We show that, without compromising test specificity, test sensitivity can be improved so that the proportion of infected herds detected by the skin test, improves by over 16 percentage points. While many risk factors are associated with increased risk of becoming infected, of note are several factors which suggest that, in some herds there is a higher risk of infection going undetected, including effects that are correlated to the veterinary practice conducting the test, and number of livestock moved off the herd.
Read more4/8/2024
0
Analytical results for uncertainty propagation through trained machine learning regression models
Andrew Thompson
Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being used in metrology applications. However, for ML models to be credible in a metrology context they should be accompanied by principled uncertainty quantification. This paper addresses the challenge of uncertainty propagation through trained/fixed machine learning (ML) regression models. Analytical expressions for the mean and variance of the model output are obtained/presented for certain input data distributions and for a variety of ML models. Our results cover several popular ML models including linear regression, penalised linear regression, kernel ridge regression, Gaussian Processes (GPs), support vector machines (SVMs) and relevance vector machines (RVMs). We present numerical experiments in which we validate our methods and compare them with a Monte Carlo approach from a computational efficiency point of view. We also illustrate our methods in the context of a metrology application, namely modelling the state-of-health of lithium-ion cells based upon Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) data
Read more5/9/2024