Simultaneous inference for generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders

Overview

• Investigates the problem of performing large-scale hypothesis tests in the presence of unmeasured confounding factors
• Proposes a unified statistical framework to address this issue, leveraging orthogonal structures and linear projections
• Establishes theoretical guarantees for the method, including effective Type-I error control and non-asymptotic error bounds
• Demonstrates the method's superiority over alternatives through numerical experiments and a real-world single-cell RNA-seq analysis

Plain English Explanation

When conducting genomic studies, researchers often perform thousands of statistical tests simultaneously to identify genes that are expressed differently between two groups. However, the presence of unmeasured confounding factors can significantly bias the results of these standard approaches.

The proposed method addresses this issue by disentangling the effects of confounding factors from the primary effects of interest. It does this in three key steps:

1. First, it separates the marginal and uncorrelated confounding effects to recover the underlying coefficients.
2. Next, it jointly estimates the latent factors and primary effects using a lasso-type optimization.
3. Finally, it incorporates projected and weighted bias-correction steps to improve the accuracy of hypothesis testing.

Theoretically, the method is shown to effectively control the Type-I error rate (the probability of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis) as the sample size and number of responses grow. Practical experiments demonstrate that it can outperform alternative approaches in terms of controlling the false discovery rate and statistical power.

The researchers also apply the method to a single-cell RNA-seq dataset, showing its ability to adjust for confounding effects even when the relevant covariates are not included in the model.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates the problem of performing large-scale hypothesis testing in the context of multivariate generalized linear models, where unmeasured confounding effects can lead to substantial bias in standard statistical approaches.

The proposed framework consists of three key stages:

1. Disentangling Confounding Effects: The method first separates the marginal and uncorrelated confounding effects to recover the underlying latent coefficients. This is achieved by leveraging the orthogonal structures in the model.

2. Joint Estimation of Latent Factors and Effects: The latent factors and primary effects are then jointly estimated through a lasso-type optimization procedure, which helps ensure accurate and stable recovery of the model parameters.

3. Bias-Corrected Hypothesis Testing: Finally, the method incorporates projected and weighted bias-correction steps into the hypothesis testing process. This helps ensure effective control of the Type-I error rate, as established by the theoretical analysis.

The theoretical contributions of the paper include establishing the identification conditions for the various effects and deriving non-asymptotic error bounds. The researchers show that the proposed asymptotic z-tests can effectively control the Type-I error as the sample size and response dimensions approach infinity.

The numerical experiments demonstrate that the method can outperform alternative approaches in terms of false discovery rate control and statistical power. The real-world single-cell RNA-seq analysis further showcases the method's ability to adjust for confounding effects even when the relevant covariates are not included in the model.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and theoretically-grounded approach to addressing the challenge of large-scale hypothesis testing in the presence of unmeasured confounding. The authors have provided a thorough analysis of the method's theoretical properties and demonstrated its practical effectiveness through numerical simulations and a real-world application.

One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on certain assumptions, such as the linearity of the generalized linear model and the availability of a sufficiently large sample size. In practice, these assumptions may not always hold, and it would be valuable to explore the method's performance under more relaxed conditions or alternative modeling frameworks, such as those presented in Bayesian Inference for Consistent Predictions in Overparameterized Nonlinear Regression or Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the ability to adjust for unmeasured confounding, it does not explicitly address the problem of discrete nonparametric causal discovery under latent classes, which may be a relevant consideration in certain genomic applications. Exploring the integration of these complementary approaches could further enhance the framework's capabilities.

Finally, the Doubly Robust Inference for Causal Latent Factor Models provide an interesting perspective on leveraging causal structures to improve statistical inference, which could potentially be incorporated into the proposed methodology to strengthen its theoretical foundations and practical performance.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of large-scale hypothesis testing, particularly in the context of genomic studies with unmeasured confounding. The proposed framework offers a robust and theoretically-grounded approach that can significantly improve the reliability of research findings in this domain.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a unified statistical framework for performing large-scale hypothesis tests in the presence of unmeasured confounding effects, which is a common challenge in genomic studies. The method leverages orthogonal structures and linear projections to disentangle the effects of confounding factors, jointly estimate the latent factors and primary effects, and incorporate bias-correction steps for accurate hypothesis testing.

The theoretical analysis establishes strong guarantees for the method, including effective Type-I error control and non-asymptotic error bounds. The practical experiments demonstrate the method's superiority over alternative approaches in terms of false discovery rate control and statistical power. The real-world single-cell RNA-seq analysis further showcases the method's ability to adjust for confounding effects even when the relevant covariates are not included in the model.

Overall, this research presents a valuable contribution to the field of large-scale hypothesis testing, particularly in the context of genomic studies. The proposed framework offers a robust and theoretically-grounded approach that can significantly improve the reliability of research findings in this domain, with potential implications for a wide range of applications.