An Analysis of Driver-Initiated Takeovers during Assisted Driving and their Effect on Driver Satisfaction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how drivers interact with assisted driving systems by analyzing driver-initiated takeovers during assisted driving and their impact on driver satisfaction.
- The study investigates the factors that influence driver takeovers and how they affect the driver's user experience.
- The findings provide insights into improving the design of assisted driving systems to better accommodate driver preferences and behaviors.
Plain English Explanation
Self-driving cars are becoming more common, but they still have limitations. Drivers often need to take over control from the car's autonomous systems, especially in difficult or unexpected situations. This paper looks at how and why drivers choose to take back control of the car during assisted driving, and how that affects their satisfaction and experience.
The researchers studied the different reasons drivers might decide to take control, such as feeling uncomfortable with the car's actions or wanting more control in a challenging situation. They also looked at how the driver's takeover of the car impacts their overall satisfaction with the assisted driving system.
The goal is to use these insights to improve the design of self-driving car technology. By better understanding driver behavior and preferences, engineers can create assisted driving systems that are more intuitive and satisfying for users. This could help build trust in the technology and make people more willing to use self-driving features in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an analysis of driver-initiated takeovers during assisted driving and their effect on driver satisfaction. The researchers conducted a study where participants used an assisted driving system in a simulated environment and were able to take over control of the vehicle at any time.
The study examined the factors that influence when and why drivers choose to initiate a takeover, such as the driving context, the driver's preferences, and the system's performance. The researchers also investigated how the experience of taking over control affects the driver's overall satisfaction with the assisted driving system.
The findings provide insights into improving the design of assisted driving systems to better accommodate driver behaviors and preferences. By understanding the reasons behind driver takeovers and their impact on user experience, the researchers aim to develop self-driving technologies that are more intuitive and satisfying for users.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of driver-initiated takeovers during assisted driving and their impact on user satisfaction. However, the study was conducted in a simulated environment, which may not fully capture the complexity and unpredictability of real-world driving scenarios. Further research is needed to validate the findings in more realistic driving conditions.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential safety implications of frequent driver takeovers. Frequent switching between autonomous and manual control could introduce additional risks and challenges that should be explored in future studies.
The research also focuses primarily on the driver's perspective, but the impact on other road users and the overall transportation system should be considered. The integration of assisted driving systems into the broader transportation ecosystem is an important area for future investigation.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable insights into the interaction between drivers and assisted driving systems. By understanding the factors that influence driver takeovers and their impact on user satisfaction, researchers and engineers can work to develop self-driving technologies that better align with driver preferences and behaviors.
Improving the design of assisted driving systems could help build trust and acceptance in the technology, ultimately leading to more widespread adoption and the realization of the potential benefits of autonomous vehicles for both individuals and society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An Analysis of Driver-Initiated Takeovers during Assisted Driving and their Effect on Driver Satisfaction
Robin Schwager, Michael Grimm, Xin Liu, Lukas Ewecker, Tim Bruehl, Tin Stribor Sohn, Soeren Hohmann
During the use of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), drivers can intervene in the active function and take back control due to various reasons. However, the specific reasons for driver-initiated takeovers in naturalistic driving are still not well understood. In order to get more information on the reasons behind these takeovers, a test group study was conducted. There, 17 participants used a predictive longitudinal driving function for their daily commutes and annotated the reasons for their takeovers during active function use. In this paper, the recorded takeovers are analyzed and the different reasons for them are highlighted. The results show that the reasons can be divided into three main categories. The most common category consists of takeovers which aim to adjust the behavior of the ADAS within its Operational Design Domain (ODD) in order to better match the drivers' personal preferences. Other reasons include takeovers due to leaving the ADAS's ODD and corrections of incorrect sensing state information. Using the questionnaire results of the test group study, it was found that the number and frequency of takeovers especially within the ADAS's ODD have a significant negative impact on driver satisfaction. Therefore, the driver satisfaction with the ADAS could be increased by adapting its behavior to the drivers' wishes and thereby lowering the number of takeovers within the ODD. The information contained in the takeover behavior of the drivers could be used as feedback for the ADAS. Finally, it is shown that there are considerable differences in the takeover behavior of different drivers, which shows a need for ADAS individualization.
Read more6/11/2024
🤖
0
Non-Driving-Related Tasks Influencing Drivers' Takeover Time: A Meta-Analysis
Yan Zhang
Before the era of fully automated vehicles, human is consistently an indispensable part of the driving system. Various studies have investigated drivers' cooperation with the vehicle under different conditions. In this article, we analyzed how non-driving-related tasks (NDRT) influence takeover time (TOT) by conducting a meta-analysis on 37 related papers. NDRTs were transcoded into combinations of five basic dimensions to unify and demonstrate their effects on drivers. In order to interpret experimental data comprehensively, we implemented three methods. A synthetical analysis was conducted to compare the effect size between each study and subgroup. Studies with eligible control groups have been examined by the two-group analysis, followed by moderator analysis on seven variables. The results from the two-group analysis showed that both visual-mental-motoric and visual-mental tasks have significant negative effects on the takeover time and the previous type had a larger effect than the latter one. Moreover, the subgroup comparison and meta-regression in the meta-analysis part revealed the correlation between moderators and the effect size, in which the Driving Experience and the Automation Level affected the relation between NDRT and TOT. The findings of this paper can contribute to the improvement and new directions for further scientific research and engineering design.
Read more5/30/2024
🔗
0
Methods to Estimate Advanced Driver Assistance System Penetration Rates in the United States
Noah Goodall
Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are increasingly prevalent in the vehicle fleet, significantly impacting safety and capacity. Transportation agencies struggle to plan for these effects as ADAS availability is not tracked in vehicle registration databases. This paper examines methods to leverage existing public reports and databases to estimate the proportion of vehicles equipped with or utilizing Levels 1 and 2 ADAS technologies in the United States. Findings indicate that in 2022, between 8% and 25% of vehicles were equipped with various ADAS features, though actual usage rates were lower due to driver deactivation. The study proposes strategies to enhance estimates, including analyzing crash data, expanding event data recorder capabilities, conducting naturalistic driving studies, and collaborating with manufacturers to determine installation rates.
Read more8/6/2024
0
Beyond the Dashboard: Investigating Distracted Driver Communication Preferences for ADAS
Aamir Hasan, D. Livingston McPherson, Melissa Miles, Katherine Driggs-Campbell
Distracted driving is a major cause of road fatalities. With improvements in driver (in)attention detection, these distracted situations can be caught early to alert drivers and improve road safety and comfort. However, drivers may have differing preferences for the modes of such communication based on the driving scenario and their current distraction state. To this end, we present an (N=147) where videos of simulated driving scenarios were utilized to learn drivers preferences for modes of communication and their evolution with the drivers changing attention. The survey queried participants preferred modes of communication for scenarios such as collisions or stagnation at a green light. that inform the future of communication between drivers and their vehicles. We showcase the different driver preferences based on the nature of the driving scenario and also show that they evolve as the drivers distraction state changes
Read more6/26/2024