Analyzing User Characteristics of Hate Speech Spreaders on Social Media

Read original: arXiv:2310.15772 - Published 7/30/2024 by Dominique Geissler, Abdurahman Maarouf, Stefan Feuerriegel
Total Score

0

🗣️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Hate speech on social media can harm the mental and physical well-being of individuals and contribute to real-world violence.
  • Resharing is an important driver behind the spread of hate speech on social media.
  • Little is known about who reshares hate speech and what their characteristics are.

Plain English Explanation

In this study, researchers set out to analyze the role of user characteristics in hate speech resharing across different types of hate speech. They wanted to understand who is more likely to reshare hate speech and why.

First, the researchers used large language models to cluster hate speech posts into different types, such as political hate, racist hate, and misogynistic hate. This helped them identify the various forms of hate speech on social media.

Next, the researchers used an explainable machine learning model to understand how user attributes like number of followers, friends, posts, and account age affected the probability of resharing hate speech. They also accounted for the possibility that some users might be more vulnerable to engaging with hate speech.

The key finding was that users with less social influence, such as those with fewer followers and posts, tended to reshare more hate speech. However, the researchers also found significant differences in who reshares different types of hate speech. For example, racist and misogynistic hate was mostly spread by users with little social influence, while political hate against certain groups was reshared by users with larger social networks.

Understanding these patterns is crucial for detecting individuals at risk of engaging in harmful behavior and designing effective strategies to mitigate the spread of hate speech on social media.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first used large language models to cluster hate speech posts into different types, such as political, racist, and misogynistic. This allowed them to analyze how user characteristics affected the resharing of different hate speech categories.

They then modeled the effects of user attributes (e.g., number of followers, friends, posts, account age) on the probability of resharing hate speech using an explainable machine learning approach. To control for selection bias in their observational data, they applied debiasing techniques. They also accounted for the latent vulnerability of users to engaging with hate speech.

The results showed that, all else equal, users with fewer followers, friends, posts, and older accounts were more likely to reshare hate speech. This suggests that users with less social influence tend to share more hate content.

However, the researchers also found substantial heterogeneity across hate speech types. Racist and misogynistic hate was mostly spread by users with little social influence, while political anti-Trump and anti-right-wing hate was reshared by users with larger social networks.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations and potential areas for further research. For example, they note that their analysis is based on observational data, which makes it challenging to establish causal relationships. Additionally, the study focuses on a single social media platform, so the findings may not generalize to other platforms with different user dynamics.

One potential concern is that the debiasing techniques used to control for selection bias may not have fully accounted for all relevant confounding factors. It's possible that other unobserved user characteristics or contextual factors could also influence hate speech resharing behavior.

Furthermore, the study does not provide insights into the motivations or psychological factors that may drive users to reshare hate speech. Understanding these underlying mechanisms could be valuable for designing more effective interventions.

Despite these limitations, the research represents an important step forward in understanding the complex dynamics of hate speech dissemination on social media. The findings could inform the development of more targeted and nuanced approaches to content moderation and user education.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on who reshares hate speech on social media and how user characteristics influence this behavior. The key insights are that users with less social influence, such as those with fewer followers and posts, are more likely to share hate content, but the patterns vary across different types of hate speech.

These findings have significant implications for detecting individuals at risk of engaging in harmful behavior and developing effective strategies to mitigate the spread of hate speech on social media platforms. By understanding the factors that drive users to reshare hate content, policymakers and platform operators can work to create a safer and more inclusive online environment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🗣️

Total Score

0

Analyzing User Characteristics of Hate Speech Spreaders on Social Media

Dominique Geissler, Abdurahman Maarouf, Stefan Feuerriegel

Hate speech on social media threatens the mental and physical well-being of individuals and contributes to real-world violence. Resharing is an important driver behind the spread of hate speech on social media. Yet, little is known about who reshares hate speech and what their characteristics are. In this paper, we analyze the role of user characteristics in hate speech resharing across different types of hate speech (e.g., political hate). For this, we proceed as follows: First, we cluster hate speech posts using large language models to identify different types of hate speech. Then we model the effects of user attributes on users' probability to reshare hate speech using an explainable machine learning model. To do so, we apply debiasing to control for selection bias in our observational social media data and further control for the latent vulnerability of users to hate speech. We find that, all else equal, users with fewer followers, fewer friends, fewer posts, and older accounts share more hate speech. This shows that users with little social influence tend to share more hate speech. Further, we find substantial heterogeneity across different types of hate speech. For example, racist and misogynistic hate is spread mostly by users with little social influence. In contrast, political anti-Trump and anti-right-wing hate is reshared by users with larger social influence. Overall, understanding the factors that drive users to share hate speech is crucial for detecting individuals at risk of engaging in harmful behavior and for designing effective mitigation strategies.

Read more

7/30/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories

Verena Schoenmueller, Simon J. Blanchard, Gita V. Johar

We propose that social-media users' own post histories are an underused yet valuable resource for studying fake-news sharing. By extracting textual cues from their prior posts, and contrasting their prevalence against random social-media users and others (e.g., those with similar socio-demographics, political news-sharers, and fact-check sharers), researchers can identify cues that distinguish fake-news sharers, predict those most likely to share fake news, and identify promising constructs to build interventions. Our research includes studies along these lines. In Study 1, we explore the distinctive language patterns of fake-news sharers, highlighting elements such as their higher use of anger and power-related words. In Study 2, we show that adding textual cues into predictive models enhances their accuracy in predicting fake-news sharers. In Study 3, we explore the contrasting role of trait and situational anger, and show trait anger is associated with a greater propensity to share both true and fake news. In Study 4, we introduce a way to authenticate Twitter accounts in surveys, before using it to explore how crafting an ad copy that resonates with users' sense of power encourages the adoption of fact-checking tools. We hope to encourage the use of novel research methods for marketers and misinformation researchers.

Read more

7/23/2024

Easy-access online social media metrics can effectively identify misinformation sharing users
Total Score

0

Easy-access online social media metrics can effectively identify misinformation sharing users

J'ulia Sz'amely, Alessandro Galeazzi, J'ulia Koltai, Elisa Omodei

Misinformation poses a significant challenge studied extensively by researchers, yet acquiring data to identify primary sharers is costly and challenging. To address this, we propose a low-barrier approach to differentiate social media users who are more likely to share misinformation from those who are less likely. Leveraging insights from previous studies, we demonstrate that easy-access online social network metrics -- average daily tweet count, and account age -- can be leveraged to help identify potential low factuality content spreaders on X (previously known as Twitter). We find that higher tweet frequency is positively associated with low factuality in shared content, while account age is negatively associated with it. We also find that some of the effects, namely the effect of the number of accounts followed and the number of tweets produced, differ depending on the number of followers a user has. Our findings show that relying on these easy-access social network metrics could serve as a low-barrier approach for initial identification of users who are more likely to spread misinformation, and therefore contribute to combating misinformation effectively on social media platforms.

Read more

8/28/2024

Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets
Total Score

0

Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets

Sadar Jaf, Basel Barakat

Despite the extensive communication benefits offered by social media platforms, numerous challenges must be addressed to ensure user safety. One of the most significant risks faced by users on these platforms is targeted hate speech. Social media platforms are widely utilised for generating datasets employed in training and evaluating machine learning algorithms for hate speech detection. However, existing public datasets exhibit numerous limitations, hindering the effective training of these algorithms and leading to inaccurate hate speech classification. This study provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of several public datasets commonly used in automated hate speech classification. Through rigorous analysis, we present compelling evidence highlighting the limitations of current hate speech datasets. Additionally, we conduct a range of statistical analyses to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses inherent in these datasets. This work aims to advance the development of more accurate and reliable machine learning models for hate speech detection by addressing the dataset limitations identified.

Read more

7/18/2024