Annotator-Centric Active Learning for Subjective NLP Tasks
2404.15720
0
0
Abstract
Active Learning (AL) addresses the high costs of collecting human annotations by strategically annotating the most informative samples. However, for subjective NLP tasks, incorporating a wide range of perspectives in the annotation process is crucial to capture the variability in human judgments. We introduce Annotator-Centric Active Learning (ACAL), which incorporates an annotator selection strategy following data sampling. Our objective is two-fold: (1) to efficiently approximate the full diversity of human judgments, and (2) to assess model performance using annotator-centric metrics, which emphasize minority perspectives over a majority. We experiment with multiple annotator selection strategies across seven subjective NLP tasks, employing both traditional and novel, human-centered evaluation metrics. Our findings indicate that ACAL improves data efficiency and excels in annotator-centric performance evaluations. However, its success depends on the availability of a sufficiently large and diverse pool of annotators to sample from.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes an "annotator-centric" active learning approach for subjective NLP tasks, where the model actively selects samples to be labeled by annotators based on their individual characteristics and preferences.
- The researchers aim to improve the efficiency and quality of the active learning process by considering the subjective nature of the task and the variability in annotator expertise and biases.
- The proposed method is evaluated on sentiment analysis and emotion recognition tasks, demonstrating improvements over traditional active learning approaches.
Plain English Explanation
In many natural language processing (NLP) tasks, such as sentiment analysis or emotion recognition, the labels assigned to text can be quite subjective ā different people may interpret the same text in different ways. Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Tasks has highlighted the challenges that this subjectivity can pose for training machine learning models.
The researchers in this paper propose a new approach called "annotator-centric active learning" to address this challenge. Typically, active learning involves the model selecting the most informative unlabeled samples to be labeled by human annotators, in order to efficiently train the model. However, the researchers argue that this traditional approach doesn't account for the individual differences between annotators.
Their "annotator-centric" approach aims to personalize the active learning process by considering each annotator's unique characteristics and preferences. The model selects samples to be labeled based not only on their informative value, but also on how well they match the annotator's expertise and biases. The goal is to improve the overall efficiency and quality of the active learning process by tailoring it to the subjective nature of the task and the variability among annotators.
The researchers evaluate their approach on sentiment analysis and emotion recognition tasks, and show that it can outperform traditional active learning methods. This suggests that considering the human element in the labeling process can lead to better model training, especially for subjective NLP tasks.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose an "annotator-centric" active learning approach for subjective NLP tasks, which aims to improve the efficiency and quality of the active learning process by incorporating information about the annotators' individual characteristics and preferences.
Traditionally, active learning involves the model selecting the most informative unlabeled samples to be labeled by human annotators, in order to efficiently train the model. However, the researchers argue that this approach doesn't account for the subjective nature of the task and the variability among annotators.
Their proposed method, called Annotator-Centric Active Learning (ACAL), extends the active learning framework by modeling the annotators' expertise, biases, and preferences. The model selects samples to be labeled not only based on their informativeness, but also on how well they match the annotator's characteristics. This personalization of the active learning process is intended to improve the overall quality and efficiency of the labeling.
The ACAL method is evaluated on sentiment analysis and emotion recognition tasks, and is compared to traditional active learning approaches as well as a random sampling baseline. The results show that ACAL outperforms the other methods, demonstrating the benefits of the annotator-centric approach for subjective NLP tasks.
The researchers also discuss the fragility of active learners and the potential for noise correction in subjective datasets, which are important considerations for the deployment of such systems in real-world settings.
Critical Analysis
The proposed "annotator-centric" active learning approach is a promising step towards addressing the challenges of subjective NLP tasks, where the variability in annotator perspectives can pose a significant challenge for model training.
By incorporating information about the annotators' individual characteristics, the ACAL method aims to personalize the active learning process and improve its efficiency and quality. This is a valuable contribution, as Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Tasks has highlighted the importance of considering annotator variability in such domains.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the specific characteristics and biases of the annotators used in the experiments, or how they were measured and incorporated into the ACAL model. Additionally, the researchers acknowledge the fragility of active learners and the potential for noise correction in subjective datasets, which are important practical considerations that deserve further investigation.
Furthermore, while the ACAL method demonstrates improvements over traditional active learning approaches, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other relevant techniques, such as Anchoral: A Computationally Efficient Active Learning Algorithm for Large, Imbalanced Datasets, which may also be applicable to subjective NLP tasks.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of active learning for subjective NLP tasks, but would benefit from a more detailed exploration of the practical challenges and a more comprehensive comparative analysis to solidify the significance of the proposed approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces an "annotator-centric" active learning approach for subjective NLP tasks, such as sentiment analysis and emotion recognition. The key idea is to personalize the active learning process by incorporating information about the individual characteristics and preferences of the annotators, in order to improve the efficiency and quality of the labeling.
The proposed ACAL method outperforms traditional active learning approaches in the evaluated tasks, demonstrating the potential benefits of considering the human element in the active learning process for subjective domains. This work highlights the importance of addressing annotator variability and subjectivity in NLP, and suggests that tailoring the active learning strategy to the annotators' unique characteristics can lead to more robust and reliable model training.
While the paper presents a valuable contribution, there are still opportunities for further research to address the practical challenges of deploying such systems, such as the fragility of active learners and the potential for noise correction in subjective datasets. Nonetheless, the "annotator-centric" approach proposed in this work represents an important step towards improving the effectiveness of active learning for subjective NLP tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotation
Hamidreza Rouzegar, Masoud Makrehchi
0
0
In the context of text classification, the financial burden of annotation exercises for creating training data is a critical issue. Active learning techniques, particularly those rooted in uncertainty sampling, offer a cost-effective solution by pinpointing the most instructive samples for manual annotation. Similarly, Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 provide an alternative for automated annotation but come with concerns regarding their reliability. This study introduces a novel methodology that integrates human annotators and LLMs within an Active Learning framework. We conducted evaluations on three public datasets. IMDB for sentiment analysis, a Fake News dataset for authenticity discernment, and a Movie Genres dataset for multi-label classification.The proposed framework integrates human annotation with the output of LLMs, depending on the model uncertainty levels. This strategy achieves an optimal balance between cost efficiency and classification performance. The empirical results show a substantial decrease in the costs associated with data annotation while either maintaining or improving model accuracy.
6/19/2024
š
Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Tasks
Negar Mokhberian, Myrl G. Marmarelis, Frederic R. Hopp, Valerio Basile, Fred Morstatter, Kristina Lerman
0
0
Supervised classification heavily depends on datasets annotated by humans. However, in subjective tasks such as toxicity classification, these annotations often exhibit low agreement among raters. Annotations have commonly been aggregated by employing methods like majority voting to determine a single ground truth label. In subjective tasks, aggregating labels will result in biased labeling and, consequently, biased models that can overlook minority opinions. Previous studies have shed light on the pitfalls of label aggregation and have introduced a handful of practical approaches to tackle this issue. Recently proposed multi-annotator models, which predict labels individually per annotator, are vulnerable to under-determination for annotators with few samples. This problem is exacerbated in crowdsourced datasets. In this work, we propose textbf{Annotator Aware Representations for Texts (AART)} for subjective classification tasks. Our approach involves learning representations of annotators, allowing for exploration of annotation behaviors. We show the improvement of our method on metrics that assess the performance on capturing individual annotators' perspectives. Additionally, we demonstrate fairness metrics to evaluate our model's equability of performance for marginalized annotators compared to others.
5/17/2024
On the Fragility of Active Learners
Abhishek Ghose, Emma Thuong Nguyen
0
0
Active learning (AL) techniques aim to maximally utilize a labeling budget by iteratively selecting instances that are most likely to improve prediction accuracy. However, their benefit compared to random sampling has not been consistent across various setups, e.g., different datasets, classifiers. In this empirical study, we examine how a combination of different factors might obscure any gains from an AL technique. Focusing on text classification, we rigorously evaluate AL techniques over around 1000 experiments that vary wrt the dataset, batch size, text representation and the classifier. We show that AL is only effective in a narrow set of circumstances. We also address the problem of using metrics that are better aligned with real world expectations. The impact of this study is in its insights for a practitioner: (a) the choice of text representation and classifier is as important as that of an AL technique, (b) choice of the right metric is critical in assessment of the latter, and, finally, (c) reported AL results must be holistically interpreted, accounting for variables other than just the query strategy.
4/16/2024
š
Noise Correction on Subjective Datasets
Uthman Jinadu, Yi Ding
0
0
Incorporating every annotator's perspective is crucial for unbiased data modeling. Annotator fatigue and changing opinions over time can distort dataset annotations. To combat this, we propose to learn a more accurate representation of diverse opinions by utilizing multitask learning in conjunction with loss-based label correction. We show that using our novel formulation, we can cleanly separate agreeing and disagreeing annotations. Furthermore, this method provides a controllable way to encourage or discourage disagreement. We demonstrate that this modification can improve prediction performance in a single or multi-annotator setting. Lastly, we show that this method remains robust to additional label noise that is applied to subjective data.
6/5/2024