AnoVox: A Benchmark for Multimodal Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving
0
❗
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes AnoVox, the largest benchmark for detecting anomalies in autonomous driving.
- AnoVox incorporates large-scale multimodal sensor data and spatial voxel ground truth, allowing for the comparison of anomaly detection methods independent of their used sensors.
- The paper defines normality and provides a compliant training dataset, and AnoVox is the first benchmark to contain both content and temporal anomalies.
Plain English Explanation
The ability of autonomous vehicles to handle rare or unexpected situations on the road is crucial for their widespread adoption. Anomaly detection for autonomous driving has made significant progress, but existing benchmarks have a strong focus on camera data, which may not be representative of real-world driving scenarios.
The researchers have developed AnoVox, a new benchmark that addresses these limitations. AnoVox includes a diverse set of sensor data, such as LiDAR and radar, as well as detailed ground truth information about the spatial location of anomalies. This allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of anomaly detection algorithms, regardless of the sensors they use.
Additionally, the researchers have provided a formal definition of "normality" and a corresponding training dataset, ensuring that anomaly detection methods are assessed against a clear and consistent baseline. AnoVox is also the first benchmark to include both content anomalies (unexpected objects on the road) and temporal anomalies (unexpected changes in the environment over time).
By addressing these key challenges, AnoVox aims to accelerate the development of robust and reliable anomaly detection systems for autonomous vehicles, ultimately paving the way for their wider adoption and safer deployment on our roads.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces AnoVox, a new benchmark for evaluating anomaly detection in autonomous driving. Existing benchmarks have primarily focused on camera data, which may not accurately represent the diverse sensor modalities used in real-world autonomous driving systems.
To address this, the researchers have created AnoVox, which incorporates large-scale multimodal sensor data, including LiDAR and radar, along with precise spatial voxel ground truth for anomalies. This allows for the evaluation of anomaly detection methods independent of the specific sensors they use.
The paper also provides a formal definition of "normality" and a corresponding training dataset, ensuring a consistent baseline for assessing anomaly detection algorithms. Notably, AnoVox is the first benchmark to include both content anomalies (unexpected objects on the road) and temporal anomalies (unexpected changes in the environment over time).
The researchers have designed AnoVox to be a comprehensive and standardized platform for evaluating anomaly detection in autonomous driving, addressing the limitations of existing benchmarks and enabling more reliable and robust systems to be developed.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of anomaly detection for autonomous vehicles by introducing a new benchmark that addresses the shortcomings of previous datasets. The inclusion of multimodal sensor data and spatial voxel ground truth is a significant step forward, as it allows for a more holistic evaluation of anomaly detection methods.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or challenges of the AnoVox dataset, such as the representativeness of the anomalies or the scalability of the benchmark to real-world driving conditions. Additionally, the paper does not provide a comparative analysis of AnoVox against other existing benchmarks, which could help readers understand its unique strengths and weaknesses.
Further research could also explore the integration of AnoVox with spatio-temporal anomaly detection techniques, as well as the potential for transfer learning and domain adaptation to improve the generalization of anomaly detection models across diverse driving scenarios.
Conclusion
The AnoVox benchmark proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of anomaly detection for autonomous vehicles. By incorporating multimodal sensor data and detailed spatial ground truth, the benchmark enables a more comprehensive and reliable evaluation of anomaly detection algorithms, regardless of their specific sensor requirements.
The inclusion of both content and temporal anomalies, as well as the provision of a formal definition of normality and a compliant training dataset, further strengthens the utility of AnoVox as a standardized platform for the development and assessment of robust anomaly detection systems. As autonomous vehicles continue to navigate increasingly complex road environments, tools like AnoVox will be crucial in ensuring their safety and enabling their widespread adoption.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
❗
0
AnoVox: A Benchmark for Multimodal Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving
Daniel Bogdoll, Iramm Hamdard, Lukas Namgyu Ro{ss}ler, Felix Geisler, Muhammed Bayram, Felix Wang, Jan Imhof, Miguel de Campos, Anushervon Tabarov, Yitian Yang, Hanno Gottschalk, J. Marius Zollner
The scale-up of autonomous vehicles depends heavily on their ability to deal with anomalies, such as rare objects on the road. In order to handle such situations, it is necessary to detect anomalies in the first place. Anomaly detection for autonomous driving has made great progress in the past years but suffers from poorly designed benchmarks with a strong focus on camera data. In this work, we propose AnoVox, the largest benchmark for ANOmaly detection in autonomous driving to date. AnoVox incorporates large-scale multimodal sensor data and spatial VOXel ground truth, allowing for the comparison of methods independent of their used sensor. We propose a formal definition of normality and provide a compliant training dataset. AnoVox is the first benchmark to contain both content and temporal anomalies.
Read more9/27/2024
0
Hybrid Video Anomaly Detection for Anomalous Scenarios in Autonomous Driving
Daniel Bogdoll, Jan Imhof, Tim Joseph, Svetlana Pavlitska, J. Marius Zollner
In autonomous driving, the most challenging scenarios can only be detected within their temporal context. Most video anomaly detection approaches focus either on surveillance or traffic accidents, which are only a subfield of autonomous driving. We present HF$^2$-VAD$_{AD}$, a variation of the HF$^2$-VAD surveillance video anomaly detection method for autonomous driving. We learn a representation of normality from a vehicle's ego perspective and evaluate pixel-wise anomaly detections in rare and critical scenarios.
Read more10/2/2024
❗
0
Systematic Review: Anomaly Detection in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles
J. R. V. Solaas, N. Tuptuk, E. Mariconti
This systematic review focuses on anomaly detection for connected and autonomous vehicles. The initial database search identified 2160 articles, of which 203 were included in this review after rigorous screening and assessment. This study revealed that the most commonly used Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms employed in anomaly detection are neural networks like LSTM, CNN, and autoencoders, alongside one-class SVM. Most anomaly-based models were trained using real-world operational vehicle data, although anomalies, such as attacks and faults, were often injected artificially into the datasets. These models were evaluated mostly using five key evaluation metrics: recall, accuracy, precision, F1-score, and false positive rate. The most frequently used selection of evaluation metrics used for anomaly detection models were accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This systematic review presents several recommendations. First, there is a need to incorporate multiple evaluation metrics to provide a comprehensive assessment of the anomaly detection models. Second, only a small proportion of the studies have made their models open source, indicating a need to share models publicly to facilitate collaboration within the research community, and to validate and compare findings effectively. Third, there is a need for benchmarking datasets with predefined anomalies or cyberattacks to test and improve the effectiveness of the proposed anomaly-based detection models. Furthermore, there is a need for future research to investigate the deployment of anomaly detection to a vehicle to assess its performance on the road. There is a notable lack of research done on intrusion detection systems using different protocols to CAN, such as Ethernet and FlexRay.
Read more5/7/2024
0
UMAD: Unsupervised Mask-Level Anomaly Detection for Autonomous Driving
Daniel Bogdoll, Noel Ollick, Tim Joseph, Svetlana Pavlitska, J. Marius Zollner
Dealing with atypical traffic scenarios remains a challenging task in autonomous driving. However, most anomaly detection approaches cannot be trained on raw sensor data but require exposure to outlier data and powerful semantic segmentation models trained in a supervised fashion. This limits the representation of normality to labeled data, which does not scale well. In this work, we revisit unsupervised anomaly detection and present UMAD, leveraging generative world models and unsupervised image segmentation. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art unsupervised anomaly detection.
Read more10/2/2024