Applications of Generative AI in Healthcare: algorithmic, ethical, legal and societal considerations
2406.10632
0
0
🤖
Abstract
Generative AI is rapidly transforming medical imaging and text analysis, offering immense potential for enhanced diagnosis and personalized care. However, this transformative technology raises crucial ethical, societal, and legal questions. This paper delves into these complexities, examining issues of accuracy, informed consent, data privacy, and algorithmic limitations in the context of generative AI's application to medical imaging and text. We explore the legal landscape surrounding liability and accountability, emphasizing the need for robust regulatory frameworks. Furthermore, we dissect the algorithmic challenges, including data biases, model limitations, and workflow integration. By critically analyzing these challenges and proposing responsible solutions, we aim to foster a roadmap for ethical and responsible implementation of generative AI in healthcare, ensuring its transformative potential serves humanity with utmost care and precision.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Explores the applications of generative AI in healthcare, considering algorithmic, ethical, legal, and societal implications
- Examines the use of generative AI for tasks like medical imaging and text analysis
- Discusses key considerations around informed consent, data privacy, algorithmic bias, model limitations, and workflow integration
- Analyzes the regulatory, liability, and accountability challenges in deploying generative AI in healthcare
Plain English Explanation
Generative AI is a powerful technology that can create new content, such as images or text, based on patterns in existing data. This paper looks at how generative AI could be used in healthcare, and the important issues that need to be considered.
One area where generative AI could be helpful is in analyzing medical scans and other medical data. Generative AI models could potentially identify patterns and generate insights to assist doctors in making diagnoses and treatment decisions. [See related work: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/rapid-review-generative-ai-smart-medical-applications]
However, using generative AI in healthcare raises some ethical concerns. Patients need to fully understand how their data is being used and give informed consent. There are also risks around data privacy, as generative AI models could potentially reveal sensitive information. [See related work: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/generative-artificial-intelligence-systematic-review-applications]
Another issue is algorithmic bias - if the data used to train the AI has inherent biases, the model's outputs could perpetuate those biases. There are also limitations to what generative AI models can do, and it's important to understand their capabilities and boundaries. [See related work: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/sociotechnical-implications-generative-artificial-intelligence-information-access]
Integrating generative AI into healthcare workflows also presents challenges. Doctors and nurses need to understand how to effectively use the technology and trust its outputs. There are also legal and regulatory questions around liability and accountability that need to be addressed. [See related work: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/frontier-ai-ethics-anticipating-evaluating-societal-impacts]
Overall, this paper highlights the promise of generative AI in healthcare, but also emphasizes the need to carefully consider the ethical, legal, and societal implications as the technology is developed and deployed. [See related work: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/global-ai-governance-healthcare-cross-jurisdictional-regulatory]
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the potential applications of generative AI in healthcare, as well as the algorithmic, ethical, legal, and societal considerations that must be addressed.
The authors discuss how generative AI could be used for tasks like medical image analysis and text generation to assist clinicians. For example, generative models could analyze medical scans to identify patterns and generate insights to support diagnosis and treatment decisions.
However, the paper highlights several key challenges. Informed consent and data privacy are critical issues, as patients need to understand how their data is being used by generative AI systems. There are also risks around algorithmic bias, where biases in training data could be reflected in the model's outputs.
The limitations of generative AI models must also be well-understood, as they may have difficulty with certain types of medical data or tasks. Integrating these systems into clinical workflows is another challenge, as clinicians need to trust the technology and understand how to use it effectively.
The authors also explore the legal and regulatory hurdles around liability, accountability, and oversight for generative AI in healthcare. Cross-jurisdictional differences in rules and guidelines add further complexity.
Overall, the paper emphasizes that while generative AI shows promise for healthcare applications, there are significant ethical, technical, and practical considerations that must be carefully addressed to ensure these systems are deployed responsibly and with safeguards in place.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the potential applications and challenges of using generative AI in healthcare. It rightly highlights the importance of informed consent, data privacy, and algorithmic bias as key ethical issues that must be grappled with.
One area that could have been explored in more depth is the specific technical limitations of current generative AI models and how those limitations may impact their use in medical settings. The paper mentions the need to understand model capabilities, but more detail on the types of errors or biases that could arise would be valuable.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the complex regulatory landscape and liability questions around generative AI in healthcare. While it touches on these topics, further examination of the various stakeholders, jurisdictions, and legal frameworks involved would strengthen the analysis.
The authors also do not directly address potential societal impacts beyond the healthcare domain. For example, how might the use of generative AI in medical settings affect public trust in the healthcare system or perceptions of AI more broadly? Exploring these wider societal implications could enhance the paper's overall perspective.
Despite these potential areas for further exploration, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the key challenges that must be navigated as generative AI becomes more prevalent in healthcare applications. Encouraging critical thinking and continued research in this important domain is a valuable contribution.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive examination of the applications and considerations around using generative AI in healthcare. It highlights the promise of generative models for tasks like medical imaging and text analysis, but also emphasizes the critical need to address ethical, legal, and practical challenges.
Key issues such as informed consent, data privacy, algorithmic bias, and model limitations must be carefully navigated. Integrating generative AI into clinical workflows and establishing clear regulatory frameworks for liability and accountability are also significant hurdles that must be overcome.
Overall, the paper underscores that while generative AI holds significant potential to enhance healthcare, its deployment requires a thoughtful, multifaceted approach that prioritizes the well-being of patients and the integrity of the medical system. Continued research, stakeholder collaboration, and a commitment to responsible innovation will be essential as this technology continues to evolve.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
Rapid Review of Generative AI in Smart Medical Applications
Yuan Sun, Jorge Ortiz
0
0
With the continuous advancement of technology, artificial intelligence has significantly impacted various fields, particularly healthcare. Generative models, a key AI technology, have revolutionized medical image generation, data analysis, and diagnosis. This article explores their application in intelligent medical devices. Generative models enhance diagnostic speed and accuracy, improving medical service quality and efficiency while reducing equipment costs. These models show great promise in medical image generation, data analysis, and diagnosis. Additionally, integrating generative models with IoT technology facilitates real-time data analysis and predictions, offering smarter healthcare services and aiding in telemedicine. Challenges include computational demands, ethical concerns, and scenario-specific limitations.
6/12/2024
Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications
Sandeep Singh Sengar, Affan Bin Hasan, Sanjay Kumar, Fiona Carroll
0
0
In recent years, the study of artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a paradigm shift. This has been propelled by the groundbreaking capabilities of generative models both in supervised and unsupervised learning scenarios. Generative AI has shown state-of-the-art performance in solving perplexing real-world conundrums in fields such as image translation, medical diagnostics, textual imagery fusion, natural language processing, and beyond. This paper documents the systematic review and analysis of recent advancements and techniques in Generative AI with a detailed discussion of their applications including application-specific models. Indeed, the major impact that generative AI has made to date, has been in language generation with the development of large language models, in the field of image translation and several other interdisciplinary applications of generative AI. Moreover, the primary contribution of this paper lies in its coherent synthesis of the latest advancements in these areas, seamlessly weaving together contemporary breakthroughs in the field. Particularly, how it shares an exploration of the future trajectory for generative AI. In conclusion, the paper ends with a discussion of Responsible AI principles, and the necessary ethical considerations for the sustainability and growth of these generative models.
5/21/2024
Sociotechnical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Access
Bhaskar Mitra, Henriette Cramer, Olya Gurevich
0
0
Robust access to trustworthy information is a critical need for society with implications for knowledge production, public health education, and promoting informed citizenry in democratic societies. Generative AI technologies may enable new ways to access information and improve effectiveness of existing information retrieval systems but we are only starting to understand and grapple with their long-term social implications. In this chapter, we present an overview of some of the systemic consequences and risks of employing generative AI in the context of information access. We also provide recommendations for evaluation and mitigation, and discuss challenges for future research.
5/21/2024
🤖
New!Generative AI for Synthetic Data Across Multiple Medical Modalities: A Systematic Review of Recent Developments and Challenges
Mahmoud Ibrahim, Yasmina Al Khalil, Sina Amirrajab, Chang Suna, Marcel Breeuwer, Josien Pluim, Bart Elen, Gokhan Ertaylan, Michel Dumontiera
0
0
This paper presents a comprehensive systematic review of generative models (GANs, VAEs, DMs, and LLMs) used to synthesize various medical data types, including imaging (dermoscopic, mammographic, ultrasound, CT, MRI, and X-ray), text, time-series, and tabular data (EHR). Unlike previous narrowly focused reviews, our study encompasses a broad array of medical data modalities and explores various generative models. Our search strategy queries databases such as Scopus, PubMed, and ArXiv, focusing on recent works from January 2021 to November 2023, excluding reviews and perspectives. This period emphasizes recent advancements beyond GANs, which have been extensively covered previously. The survey reveals insights from three key aspects: (1) Synthesis applications and purpose of synthesis, (2) generation techniques, and (3) evaluation methods. It highlights clinically valid synthesis applications, demonstrating the potential of synthetic data to tackle diverse clinical requirements. While conditional models incorporating class labels, segmentation masks and image translations are prevalent, there is a gap in utilizing prior clinical knowledge and patient-specific context, suggesting a need for more personalized synthesis approaches and emphasizing the importance of tailoring generative approaches to the unique characteristics of medical data. Additionally, there is a significant gap in using synthetic data beyond augmentation, such as for validation and evaluation of downstream medical AI models. The survey uncovers that the lack of standardized evaluation methodologies tailored to medical images is a barrier to clinical application, underscoring the need for in-depth evaluation approaches, benchmarking, and comparative studies to promote openness and collaboration.
7/2/2024