Sociotechnical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Access
2405.11612
0
0
Abstract
Robust access to trustworthy information is a critical need for society with implications for knowledge production, public health education, and promoting informed citizenry in democratic societies. Generative AI technologies may enable new ways to access information and improve effectiveness of existing information retrieval systems but we are only starting to understand and grapple with their long-term social implications. In this chapter, we present an overview of some of the systemic consequences and risks of employing generative AI in the context of information access. We also provide recommendations for evaluation and mitigation, and discuss challenges for future research.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access.
- It explores how the rise of generative AI systems, like large language models, could impact how people search for and interact with information.
- The paper considers potential effects on information equity, user agency, and the role of human intermediaries in information retrieval.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the increasing use of generative AI, such as advanced language models, may change the way people find and use information. Generative AI models are AI systems that can generate human-like text, images, and other content.
The authors explore how these AI systems could impact information equity - ensuring fair and equal access to information for all. They also discuss how generative AI may affect user agency, or people's ability to control and understand the information they receive. Additionally, the paper considers the changing role of human intermediaries, like librarians and search engine curators, in helping people navigate information.
The paper raises important questions about the social and societal implications of relying more on generative AI for information access. It highlights the need to carefully consider how these powerful technologies could influence the information landscape and people's experiences in accessing knowledge and making decisions.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a conceptual analysis of how generative AI systems, like large language models, could impact information access and the broader information ecosystem. The authors draw on sociotechnical theory to frame their examination of these issues.
They outline three key areas of focus: information equity, user agency, and the role of human intermediaries. For information equity, the paper explores how generative AI could exacerbate or mitigate disparities in information access and use. Regarding user agency, the authors consider how these systems may affect people's ability to understand and control the information they encounter. Finally, the paper looks at how the presence of generative AI could change the role of human experts who currently help facilitate information access and use.
The analysis is grounded in relevant theories and empirical studies on the social implications of AI and information technology more broadly. The paper does not present new empirical findings but rather offers a conceptual framework for understanding and anticipating the societal impacts of generative AI on information access.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important and timely concerns about the potential societal effects of generative AI systems, particularly in the context of information access and use. The authors thoughtfully consider multiple perspectives and draw on relevant theory and research to frame their analysis.
However, the paper does not provide concrete solutions or policy recommendations for addressing the issues it identifies. While the conceptual framework is valuable, more empirical research may be needed to fully understand how these dynamics play out in practice. The paper also acknowledges that the impacts of generative AI may be complex and context-dependent, requiring nuanced analysis.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical details or limitations of current generative AI models. A more comprehensive review of generative AI applications and their potential drawbacks could further strengthen the analysis.
Overall, the paper serves as an important starting point for considering the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. It highlights the need for continued interdisciplinary research and policymaking to ensure these transformative technologies serve the public good.
Conclusion
This paper provides a thoughtful examination of how the rise of generative AI systems could impact information access and the broader information ecosystem. The authors identify key areas of concern, including information equity, user agency, and the changing role of human intermediaries.
The conceptual analysis offers a valuable framework for understanding the societal implications of these emerging technologies. While the paper does not offer specific solutions, it underscores the importance of carefully considering the social and ethical consequences of relying more on generative AI for information access and use.
As generative AI continues to advance and become more widely adopted, this type of interdisciplinary analysis will be crucial for ensuring these powerful systems are designed and deployed in ways that promote equitable, transparent, and user-centric information access.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🐍
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Valerio Capraro, Austin Lentsch, Daron Acemoglu, Selin Akgun, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean-Franc{c}ois Bonnefon, Pablo Bra~nas-Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A. C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Chiara Longoni, Pete Lunn, Simone Natale, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander van der Linden, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Jay J. Van Bavel, Riccardo Viale
0
0
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
5/7/2024
🤖
Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Generative Agents
Seth Lazar
0
0
Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems. Other critics highlight how they foreshadow vastly more powerful future systems, which might threaten humanity's survival. The first group says there is nothing new here; the other looks through the present to a perhaps distant horizon. In this paper, I instead pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive: both their remarkable scientific achievement, and the most likely and consequential ways in which they will change society over the next five to ten years. In particular, I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Generative Agents', in which multimodal large language models (LLMs) form the executive centre of complex, tool-using AI systems that can take unsupervised sequences of actions towards some goal.
4/11/2024
⛏️
Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade-Offs Around Generative Artificial Intelligence Use
Afsaneh Razi, Layla Bouzoubaa, Aria Pessianzadeh, John S. Seberger, Rezvaneh Rezapour
0
0
In the rapidly evolving landscape of computing disciplines, substantial efforts are being dedicated to unraveling the sociotechnical implications of generative AI (Gen AI). While existing research has manifested in various forms, there remains a notable gap concerning the direct engagement of knowledge workers in academia with Gen AI. We interviewed 18 knowledge workers, including faculty and students, to investigate the social and technical dimensions of Gen AI from their perspective. Our participants raised concerns about the opacity of the data used to train Gen AI. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to identify and address inaccurate, biased, and potentially harmful, information generated by these models. Knowledge workers also expressed worries about Gen AI undermining trust in the relationship between instructor and student and discussed potential solutions, such as pedagogy readiness, to mitigate them. Additionally, participants recognized Gen AI's potential to democratize knowledge by accelerating the learning process and act as an accessible research assistant. However, there were also concerns about potential social and power imbalances stemming from unequal access to such technologies. Our study offers insights into the concerns and hopes of knowledge workers about the ethical use of Gen AI in educational settings and beyond, with implications for navigating this new landscape.
5/3/2024
Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications
Sandeep Singh Sengar, Affan Bin Hasan, Sanjay Kumar, Fiona Carroll
0
0
In recent years, the study of artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a paradigm shift. This has been propelled by the groundbreaking capabilities of generative models both in supervised and unsupervised learning scenarios. Generative AI has shown state-of-the-art performance in solving perplexing real-world conundrums in fields such as image translation, medical diagnostics, textual imagery fusion, natural language processing, and beyond. This paper documents the systematic review and analysis of recent advancements and techniques in Generative AI with a detailed discussion of their applications including application-specific models. Indeed, the major impact that generative AI has made to date, has been in language generation with the development of large language models, in the field of image translation and several other interdisciplinary applications of generative AI. Moreover, the primary contribution of this paper lies in its coherent synthesis of the latest advancements in these areas, seamlessly weaving together contemporary breakthroughs in the field. Particularly, how it shares an exploration of the future trajectory for generative AI. In conclusion, the paper ends with a discussion of Responsible AI principles, and the necessary ethical considerations for the sustainability and growth of these generative models.
5/21/2024