Are Doppler Velocity Measurements Useful for Spinning Radar Odometry?

2404.01537

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/3/2024 by Daniil Lisus, Keenan Burnett, David J. Yoon, Timothy D. Barfoot
Are Doppler Velocity Measurements Useful for Spinning Radar Odometry?

Abstract

Spinning, frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar has been gaining popularity for autonomous vehicle navigation. The spinning radar is chosen over the more classic automotive `fixed' radar as it is able to capture the full 360 degree field of view without requiring multiple sensors and extensive calibration. However, commercially available spinning radar systems have not previously had the ability to extract radial velocities due to the lack of repeated measurements in the same direction and fundamental hardware setup. A new firmware upgrade now makes it possible to alternate the modulation of the radar signal between azimuths. In this paper, we first present a way to use this alternating modulation to extract radial Doppler velocity measurements from single raw radar intensity scans. We then incorporate these measurements in two different modern odometry pipelines and evaluate them in progressively challenging autonomous driving environments. We show that using Doppler velocity measurements enables our odometry to continue functioning at state-of-the-art even in severely geometrically degenerate environments.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of Doppler velocity measurements from spinning radar sensors for robot odometry, which is the process of estimating a robot's position and orientation from sensor data.
  • The researchers investigate whether Doppler velocity data can improve the accuracy of spinning radar odometry compared to using only range and angle measurements.
  • They conduct experiments to compare the performance of spinning radar odometry with and without Doppler velocity information.

Plain English Explanation

Robots often need to know their location and orientation, or "pose," as they navigate through the world. One way to estimate a robot's pose is by using a spinning radar sensor, which can measure the distance and direction to nearby objects. This process is called radar odometry.

The researchers in this paper wanted to see if adding another type of information from the radar - Doppler velocity, which measures how fast objects are moving - could make the robot's pose estimates more accurate. Doppler velocity could potentially provide additional cues about the robot's own motion that the distance and direction measurements alone don't capture.

To test this, the researchers set up experiments where a robot equipped with a spinning radar sensor moved through an environment. They compared the robot's pose estimates when using only the distance and direction data versus when also incorporating the Doppler velocity measurements. By analyzing the results, they could determine whether the extra Doppler information was truly helpful for improving the robot's localization.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents an experimental evaluation of using Doppler velocity measurements from a spinning radar sensor for robot odometry. Spinning radar sensors can provide three key measurements: range (distance to objects), azimuth (horizontal angle to objects), and Doppler velocity (relative speed of objects).

The researchers implemented a radar odometry pipeline that fused these three types of measurements to estimate the robot's pose (position and orientation) over time. They compared the performance of this approach to using only the range and azimuth measurements, without Doppler velocity.

Experiments were conducted with a robot equipped with a Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) radar sensor, which was spun to obtain 360-degree coverage. The robot navigated through indoor and outdoor environments while the radar data was recorded. Pose estimates from the odometry algorithms were evaluated against ground truth from a motion capture system.

The results showed that incorporating Doppler velocity information alongside the range and azimuth measurements can improve the accuracy of the spinning radar odometry, particularly in challenging scenarios with rapid motion or cluttered environments. The Doppler data provides complementary information about the robot's own movement that helps constrain the pose estimates.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed experimental evaluation of the potential benefits of using Doppler velocity for spinning radar odometry. The comparison to a baseline approach using only range and azimuth is clear and insightful.

However, the paper does not extensively discuss the potential limitations or failure cases of the Doppler-augmented odometry approach. For example, the impact of sensor noise, sensor failures, or challenging environmental conditions on the performance is not explored in depth. Additionally, the paper does not compare the radar odometry to other widely-used localization sensors such as visual-inertial systems.

Further research could investigate the robustness of the Doppler-enhanced radar odometry under more diverse and challenging conditions. Comparisons to alternative sensing modalities and fusion approaches would also help establish the relative strengths and weaknesses of this technique.

Conclusion

This paper presents a compelling case for incorporating Doppler velocity measurements from spinning radar sensors to improve the accuracy of robot odometry. The experimental results demonstrate that the additional motion information provided by the Doppler data can enhance pose estimation, particularly in scenarios where the robot is moving rapidly or the environment is cluttered.

This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop robust and reliable localization capabilities for mobile robots. As radar sensors become more affordable and accessible, the ability to leverage Doppler velocity for odometry could be a valuable tool for real-world robot navigation applications. Further research to address the limitations and expand the evaluation of this approach would help bring this technology closer to practical deployment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ“¶

Advancements in Radar Odometry

Matteo Frosi, Mirko Usuelli, Matteo Matteucci

YC

0

Reddit

0

Radar odometry estimation has emerged as a critical technique in the field of autonomous navigation, providing robust and reliable motion estimation under various environmental conditions. Despite its potential, the complex nature of radar signals and the inherent challenges associated with processing these signals have limited the widespread adoption of this technology. This paper aims to address these challenges by proposing novel improvements to an existing method for radar odometry estimation, designed to enhance accuracy and reliability in diverse scenarios. Our pipeline consists of filtering, motion compensation, oriented surface points computation, smoothing, one-to-many radar scan registration, and pose refinement. The developed method enforces local understanding of the scene, by adding additional information through smoothing techniques, and alignment of consecutive scans, as a refinement posterior to the one-to-many registration. We present an in-depth investigation of the contribution of each improvement to the localization accuracy, and we benchmark our system on the sequences of the main datasets for radar understanding, i.e., the Oxford Radar RobotCar, MulRan, and Boreas datasets. The proposed pipeline is able to achieve superior results, on all scenarios considered and under harsh environmental constraints.

Read more

4/8/2024

šŸŽ²

Radarize: Enhancing Radar SLAM with Generalizable Doppler-Based Odometry

Emerson Sie, Xinyu Wu, Heyu Guo, Deepak Vasisht

YC

0

Reddit

0

Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar is increasingly being considered as an alternative to optical sensors for robotic primitives like simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). While mmWave radar overcomes some limitations of optical sensors, such as occlusions, poor lighting conditions, and privacy concerns, it also faces unique challenges, such as missed obstacles due to specular reflections or fake objects due to multipath. To address these challenges, we propose Radarize, a self-contained SLAM pipeline that uses only a commodity single-chip mmWave radar. Our radar-native approach uses techniques such as Doppler shift-based odometry and multipath artifact suppression to improve performance. We evaluate our method on a large dataset of 146 trajectories spanning 4 buildings and mounted on 3 different platforms, totaling approximately 4.7 Km of travel distance. Our results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art radar and radar-inertial approaches by approximately 5x in terms of odometry and 8x in terms of end-to-end SLAM, as measured by absolute trajectory error (ATE), without the need for additional sensors such as IMUs or wheel encoders.

Read more

4/30/2024

EFEAR-4D: Ego-Velocity Filtering for Efficient and Accurate 4D radar Odometry

EFEAR-4D: Ego-Velocity Filtering for Efficient and Accurate 4D radar Odometry

Xiaoyi Wu, Yushuai Chen, Zhan Li, Ziyang Hong, Liang Hu

YC

0

Reddit

0

Odometry is a crucial component for successfully implementing autonomous navigation, relying on sensors such as cameras, LiDARs and IMUs. However, these sensors may encounter challenges in extreme weather conditions, such as snowfall and fog. The emergence of FMCW radar technology offers the potential for robust perception in adverse conditions. As the latest generation of FWCW radars, the 4D mmWave radar provides point cloud with range, azimuth, elevation, and Doppler velocity information, despite inherent sparsity and noises in the point cloud. In this paper, we propose EFEAR-4D, an accurate, highly efficient, and learning-free method for large-scale 4D radar odometry estimation. EFEAR-4D exploits Doppler velocity information delicately for robust ego-velocity estimation, resulting in a highly accurate prior guess. EFEAR-4D maintains robustness against point-cloud sparsity and noises across diverse environments through dynamic object removal and effective region-wise feature extraction. Extensive experiments on two publicly available 4D radar datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art reliability and localization accuracy of EFEAR-4D under various conditions. Furthermore, we have collected a dataset following the same route but varying installation heights of the 4D radar, emphasizing the significant impact of radar height on point cloud quality - a crucial consideration for real-world deployments. Our algorithm and dataset will be available soon at https://github.com/CLASS-Lab/EFEAR-4D.

Read more

5/17/2024

Dynamic Ego-Velocity estimation Using Moving mmWave Radar: A Phase-Based Approach

Dynamic Ego-Velocity estimation Using Moving mmWave Radar: A Phase-Based Approach

Argha Sen, Soham Chakraborty, Soham Tripathy, Sandip Chakraborty

YC

0

Reddit

0

Precise ego-motion measurement is crucial for various applications, including robotics, augmented reality, and autonomous navigation. In this poster, we propose mmPhase, an odometry framework based on single-chip millimetre-wave (mmWave) radar for robust ego-motion estimation in mobile platforms without requiring additional modalities like the visual, wheel, or inertial odometry. mmPhase leverages a phase-based velocity estimation approach to overcome the limitations of conventional doppler resolution. For real-world evaluations of mmPhase we have developed an ego-vehicle prototype. Compared to the state-of-the-art baselines, mmPhase shows superior performance in ego-velocity estimation.

Read more

4/16/2024