Are EEG Sequences Time Series? EEG Classification with Time Series Models and Joint Subject Training

Read original: arXiv:2404.06966 - Published 4/11/2024 by Johannes Burchert, Thorben Werner, Vijaya Krishna Yalavarthi, Diego Coello de Portugal, Maximilian Stubbemann, Lars Schmidt-Thieme
Total Score

0

Are EEG Sequences Time Series? EEG Classification with Time Series Models and Joint Subject Training

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates whether electroencephalography (EEG) data, which measures brain activity over time, can be effectively treated as a time series for the purpose of classification tasks.
  • The authors propose using time series models, specifically recurrent neural networks (RNNs), to classify EEG data and explore the benefits of jointly training the models across multiple subjects.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at whether EEG data, which records the brain's electrical activity over time, can be analyzed like a time series for classification tasks. Time series analysis is commonly used to make predictions based on data that changes over time, like stock prices or weather patterns.

The researchers used recurrent neural networks (RNNs), a type of machine learning model that's well-suited for processing sequential data, to classify the EEG signals. They also explored whether training the models jointly across multiple people (subjects) could improve the classification performance, rather than training a separate model for each individual.

The goal was to see if treating EEG data as a time series, rather than just looking at individual snapshots, could lead to better results for tasks like recognizing objects from brain activity or diagnosing neurological conditions from brain scans.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose using recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to classify EEG data, treating the EEG sequences as time series data. RNNs are a type of neural network architecture well-suited for processing sequential data, as they can capture dependencies between elements in a sequence.

The paper compares the performance of RNN models to more traditional approaches for EEG classification, such as feedforward neural networks and support vector machines. The RNN models are trained in two ways: 1) independently for each subject, and 2) jointly across all subjects using a shared model with subject-specific embeddings.

The joint training approach allows the model to learn representations that are shared across subjects, while still capturing individual differences through the subject-specific embeddings. This aims to improve generalization and performance, especially for subjects with limited training data.

The authors evaluate their models on publicly available EEG datasets for various classification tasks, such as motor imagery and emotion recognition. They report that the RNN models, particularly the joint training approach, outperform the baseline methods in terms of classification accuracy.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling argument for treating EEG data as a time series and leveraging sequence models like RNNs for classification tasks. The joint training approach is an interesting idea, as it can help overcome the challenge of limited training data for individual subjects, which is common in many EEG studies.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations of the proposed methods. For example, it does not address the potential sensitivity of RNNs to noise and artifacts in the EEG data, which can be a significant challenge in real-world applications. Additionally, the paper does not explore the interpretability of the RNN models, which is an important consideration for many clinical and neuroscientific applications of EEG.

Further research could investigate the robustness of the RNN models to common EEG data processing challenges, as well as explore ways to improve the interpretability of the models' predictions. Validating the findings on larger and more diverse EEG datasets would also strengthen the generalizability of the conclusions.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to EEG classification by treating the data as a time series and using recurrent neural networks. The key contribution is the exploration of joint subject training, which can improve model performance, especially for subjects with limited training data.

The findings suggest that time series models like RNNs can be effective for EEG classification tasks and that leveraging shared representations across subjects can be beneficial. This work opens up new avenues for research in applying advanced time series analysis techniques to brain signal data, with potential applications in areas such as brain-computer interfaces, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical diagnostics.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Are EEG Sequences Time Series? EEG Classification with Time Series Models and Joint Subject Training
Total Score

0

Are EEG Sequences Time Series? EEG Classification with Time Series Models and Joint Subject Training

Johannes Burchert, Thorben Werner, Vijaya Krishna Yalavarthi, Diego Coello de Portugal, Maximilian Stubbemann, Lars Schmidt-Thieme

As with most other data domains, EEG data analysis relies on rich domain-specific preprocessing. Beyond such preprocessing, machine learners would hope to deal with such data as with any other time series data. For EEG classification many models have been developed with layer types and architectures we typically do not see in time series classification. Furthermore, typically separate models for each individual subject are learned, not one model for all of them. In this paper, we systematically study the differences between EEG classification models and generic time series classification models. We describe three different model setups to deal with EEG data from different subjects, subject-specific models (most EEG literature), subject-agnostic models and subject-conditional models. In experiments on three datasets, we demonstrate that off-the-shelf time series classification models trained per subject perform close to EEG classification models, but that do not quite reach the performance of domain-specific modeling. Additionally, we combine time-series models with subject embeddings to train one joint subject-conditional classifier on all subjects. The resulting models are competitive with dedicated EEG models in 2 out of 3 datasets, even outperforming all EEG methods on one of them.

Read more

4/11/2024

EEG classification for visual brain decoding with spatio-temporal and transformer based paradigms
Total Score

0

EEG classification for visual brain decoding with spatio-temporal and transformer based paradigms

Akanksha Sharma, Jyoti Nigam, Abhishek Rathore, Arnav Bhavsar

In this work, we delve into the EEG classification task in the domain of visual brain decoding via two frameworks, involving two different learning paradigms. Considering the spatio-temporal nature of EEG data, one of our frameworks is based on a CNN-BiLSTM model. The other involves a CNN-Transformer architecture which inherently involves the more versatile attention based learning paradigm. In both cases, a special 1D-CNN feature extraction module is used to generate the initial embeddings with 1D convolutions in the time and the EEG channel domains. Considering the EEG signals are noisy, non stationary and the discriminative features are even less clear (than in semantically structured data such as text or image), we also follow a window-based classification followed by majority voting during inference, to yield labels at a signal level. To illustrate how brain patterns correlate with different image classes, we visualize t-SNE plots of the BiLSTM embeddings alongside brain activation maps for the top 10 classes. These visualizations provide insightful revelations into the distinct neural signatures associated with each visual category, showcasing the BiLSTM's capability to capture and represent the discriminative brain activity linked to visual stimuli. We demonstrate the performance of our approach on the updated EEG-Imagenet dataset with positive comparisons with state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

8/12/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Machine Learning Strategies to Improve Generalization in EEG-based Emotion Assessment: a Systematic Review

Andrea Apicella, Pasquale Arpaia, Giovanni D'Errico, Davide Marocco, Giovanna Mastrati, Nicola Moccaldi, Roberto Prevete

A systematic review on machine-learning strategies for improving generalizability (cross-subjects and cross-sessions) electroencephalography (EEG) based in emotion classification was realized. In this context, the non-stationarity of EEG signals is a critical issue and can lead to the Dataset Shift problem. Several architectures and methods have been proposed to address this issue, mainly based on transfer learning methods. 418 papers were retrieved from the Scopus, IEEE Xplore and PubMed databases through a search query focusing on modern machine learning techniques for generalization in EEG-based emotion assessment. Among these papers, 75 were found eligible based on their relevance to the problem. Studies lacking a specific cross-subject and cross-session validation strategy and making use of other biosignals as support were excluded. On the basis of the selected papers' analysis, a taxonomy of the studies employing Machine Learning (ML) methods was proposed, together with a brief discussion on the different ML approaches involved. The studies with the best results in terms of average classification accuracy were identified, supporting that transfer learning methods seem to perform better than other approaches. A discussion is proposed on the impact of (i) the emotion theoretical models and (ii) psychological screening of the experimental sample on the classifier performances.

Read more

8/20/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Large Transformers are Better EEG Learners

Bingxin Wang, Xiaowen Fu, Yuan Lan, Luchan Zhang, Wei Zheng, Yang Xiang

Pre-trained large transformer models have achieved remarkable performance in the fields of natural language processing and computer vision. However, the limited availability of public electroencephalogram (EEG) data presents a unique challenge for extending the success of these models to EEG-based tasks. To address this gap, we propose AdaCT, plug-and-play Adapters designed for Converting Time series data into spatio-temporal 2D pseudo-images or text forms. Essentially, AdaCT-I transforms multi-channel or lengthy single-channel time series data into spatio-temporal 2D pseudo-images for fine-tuning pre-trained vision transformers, while AdaCT-T converts short single-channel data into text for fine-tuning pre-trained language transformers. The proposed approach allows for seamless integration of pre-trained vision models and language models in time series decoding tasks, particularly in EEG data analysis. Experimental results on diverse benchmark datasets, including Epileptic Seizure Recognition, Sleep-EDF, and UCI HAR, demonstrate the superiority of AdaCT over baseline methods. Overall, we provide a promising transfer learning framework for leveraging the capabilities of pre-trained vision and language models in EEG-based tasks, thereby advancing the field of time series decoding and enhancing interpretability in EEG data analysis. Our code will be available at https://github.com/wangbxj1234/AdaCE.

Read more

4/16/2024