The Art of Refusal: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but they can also produce incorrect or unreliable outputs.
• "Abstention" refers to an LLM's ability to recognize when it is unsure of the correct response and refuse to answer, rather than guessing.
• This paper surveys the current research on abstention in LLMs, including techniques for improving abstention and the implications for real-world applications.

Plain English Explanation

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/do-llms-know-when-to-not-answer">Large language models (LLMs)</a> are highly capable AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models can also sometimes produce incorrect or unreliable outputs, which can be problematic in sensitive applications like medical diagnosis or financial advice.

To address this issue, researchers are exploring the concept of "abstention" - the ability for an LLM to recognize when it is unsure of the correct response and refuse to answer, rather than guessing. This can help improve the reliability and trustworthiness of these models, as they will only provide outputs when they are confident in their responses.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/characterizing-llm-abstention-behavior-science-qa-context">The current research on abstention in LLMs</a> explores various techniques for improving this capability, such as training models to explicitly reason about their uncertainty and output a "I don't know" response when appropriate. Researchers are also investigating the implications of abstention for real-world applications, such as how it can be used to mitigate the risk of LLMs generating harmful or incorrect content.

Overall, the ability for LLMs to abstain from answering when they are uncertain is an important development that can help make these powerful AI systems more reliable and trustworthy in a wide range of applications.

Technical Explanation

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/teaching-llms-to-abstain-across-languages-via">This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current research on abstention in large language models (LLMs)</a>. Abstention refers to the ability of an LLM to recognize when it is unsure of the correct response and refuse to answer, rather than guessing.

The paper explores various techniques for improving abstention in LLMs, such as:

• Uncertainty Modeling: Training LLMs to explicitly reason about their own uncertainty and output a "I don't know" response when they are not confident in their answer.
• Conformal Prediction: Using statistical techniques to estimate the reliability of an LLM's outputs and only provide a response when the model's confidence exceeds a certain threshold.
• Iterative Refinement: Allowing LLMs to engage in a back-and-forth dialog with users to better understand the task and refine their responses over multiple iterations.

The paper also discusses the implications of abstention for real-world applications of LLMs, such as:

• Reliability in Sensitive Domains: Abstention can help mitigate the risks of LLMs generating incorrect or harmful outputs in critical applications like medical diagnosis or financial advice.
• Transparency and Explainability: Abstention can make LLMs more transparent about the limitations of their knowledge, which can improve user trust and understanding.
• Robustness to Distribution Shift: Abstention can help LLMs gracefully handle inputs that are significantly different from their training data, rather than producing unreliable outputs.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mitigating-llm-hallucinations-via-conformal-abstention">Overall, the research on abstention in LLMs highlights the importance of developing techniques that allow these powerful AI systems to recognize the limits of their knowledge and refuse to answer when they are uncertain</a>. This can help make LLMs more reliable, trustworthy, and suitable for deployment in real-world applications.

Critical Analysis

The research on abstention in large language models (LLMs) is a promising approach to addressing some of the key limitations of these powerful AI systems. By enabling LLMs to recognize when they are uncertain and refrain from responding, the risk of generating incorrect or harmful outputs can be significantly reduced.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/llms-can-learn-self-restraint-through-iterative">One potential limitation of the current research, however, is the focus on relatively narrow, task-specific applications of abstention</a>. While the techniques explored, such as uncertainty modeling and conformal prediction, have shown promising results, it will be important to investigate how these approaches can scale to more open-ended, real-world scenarios where LLMs may face a much broader range of inputs and uncertainties.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of abstention, such as the potential for these capabilities to be misused or abused. For example, LLMs could potentially exploit abstention to avoid taking responsibility for their outputs or to deflect criticism. It will be crucial for future research to carefully consider the societal and ethical ramifications of abstention as these techniques become more widely deployed.

Overall, the research on abstention in LLMs is an important step forward in developing more reliable and trustworthy AI systems. However, continued research and thoughtful consideration of the broader implications will be necessary to ensure that these capabilities are used in a responsible and ethical manner.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current research on abstention in large language models (LLMs), highlighting the importance of enabling these powerful AI systems to recognize the limits of their knowledge and refuse to answer when they are uncertain.

The various techniques explored, such as uncertainty modeling, conformal prediction, and iterative refinement, have the potential to significantly improve the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs, particularly in sensitive applications where the consequences of incorrect outputs can be severe.

While the research on abstention is promising, it is essential to continue exploring the broader implications and potential pitfalls of these capabilities. Careful consideration of the ethical and societal ramifications will be crucial as abstention becomes more widely adopted in real-world applications of LLMs.

Overall, the ability for LLMs to abstain from answering when they are unsure represents an important step forward in the development of more robust and reliable AI systems that can be safely deployed in a wide range of domains.