Teaching LLMs to Abstain across Languages via Multilingual Feedback
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores how to teach large language models (LLMs) to abstain from generating responses when they are uncertain, across multiple languages.
- The researchers developed a multilingual feedback system to train LLMs to identify when they lack the necessary knowledge or confidence to provide a reliable answer, and to abstain in those cases.
- The goal is to improve the safety and reliability of LLMs by reducing the risk of them generating harmful or nonsensical outputs, especially when used in multilingual settings.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers wanted to find a way to teach large AI language models to know when they shouldn't try to answer a question or complete a task. These models can sometimes generate responses that are inaccurate, inappropriate, or simply don't make sense, which can be problematic when they are used in real-world applications.
To address this, the researchers developed a system that provides feedback to the language models during training, teaching them to recognize when they are unsure or lack the necessary knowledge to provide a reliable response. When the model detects this uncertainty, it is trained to "abstain" - to simply say that it doesn't know the answer, rather than guessing.
Importantly, the researchers focused on training this abstention behavior across multiple languages, not just in a single language. This is crucial because many language models are now expected to work in a wide range of languages, and the researchers wanted to ensure the models could reliably abstain when needed, regardless of the language being used.
By teaching language models to abstain when uncertain, the researchers aim to improve the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems, especially when they are used in real-world applications that impact people's lives.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a multilingual feedback system to train large language models (LLMs) to abstain from generating responses when they are uncertain or lack the necessary knowledge. The key components of their methodology include:
-
Multilingual Evaluation: The researchers evaluated the LLMs' abstention behavior across a diverse set of languages, including high-resource languages like English and Spanish, as well as low-resource languages like Swahili and Hindi.
-
Multilingual Feedback: During training, the LLMs received feedback signals that indicated when their responses were inaccurate or unreliable. These feedback signals were provided in multiple languages, to reinforce the abstention behavior across languages.
-
Iterative Training: The researchers used an iterative training process, where the LLMs were first trained on a broad range of tasks, then fine-tuned with the multilingual feedback signals to improve their abstention capabilities.
-
Abstention Thresholds: The researchers experimented with different abstention thresholds, which determined the level of confidence required for the LLMs to provide a response, versus abstaining. Adjusting these thresholds allowed them to balance the trade-off between accuracy and abstention rate.
The results of the study showed that the multilingual feedback system was effective in teaching the LLMs to abstain more frequently when they were uncertain, across a diverse set of languages. This improved the overall safety and reliability of the models' outputs, reducing the risk of harmful or nonsensical responses.
Critical Analysis
The research paper presents a promising approach to improving the safety and reliability of large language models, especially in multilingual settings. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further exploration:
-
Generalization to Low-Resource Languages: While the researchers evaluated the models' performance across a range of languages, the feedback signals were primarily generated in high-resource languages. It would be valuable to explore ways to effectively provide multilingual feedback, even for low-resource languages with limited training data.
-
Real-World Deployment Challenges: The researchers focused on training and evaluating the models in a controlled, laboratory-like setting. Translating these techniques to real-world deployment scenarios, where the models may encounter a broader range of inputs and tasks, could present additional challenges.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: The researchers did not delve into the interpretability or explainability of the models' abstention decisions. Understanding the underlying reasons for the models' uncertainty could help build trust and improve their integration into real-world applications.
-
Ethical Considerations: While the research aims to improve the safety and reliability of language models, there may be ethical implications, such as the potential for the models to disproportionately abstain on certain types of inputs or for certain user groups. Further exploration of these ethical considerations would be valuable.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the development of more reliable and trustworthy large language models, particularly in multilingual settings. The insights and techniques could have significant implications for the safe and responsible deployment of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This research paper introduces a novel approach to teaching large language models (LLMs) to abstain from generating responses when they are uncertain, across multiple languages. By developing a multilingual feedback system, the researchers were able to train the LLMs to recognize when they lack the necessary knowledge or confidence to provide a reliable answer, and to refrain from responding in those cases.
The ability to teach LLMs to abstain is crucial for improving the safety and reliability of these powerful AI systems, especially when they are deployed in real-world applications that can impact people's lives. The researchers' focus on multilingual performance is particularly important, as modern language models are increasingly expected to operate in a wide range of languages.
While the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward, there are still opportunities for further exploration and refinement, such as addressing the challenges of low-resource languages, enhancing the interpretability of the models' abstention decisions, and carefully considering the ethical implications of these techniques. Nonetheless, the insights and approaches developed in this study have the potential to significantly contribute to the development of more trustworthy and responsible large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Teaching LLMs to Abstain across Languages via Multilingual Feedback
Shangbin Feng, Weijia Shi, Yike Wang, Wenxuan Ding, Orevaoghene Ahia, Shuyue Stella Li, Vidhisha Balachandran, Sunayana Sitaram, Yulia Tsvetkov
Multilingual LLMs often have knowledge disparities across languages, with larger gaps in under-resourced languages. Teaching LLMs to abstain in the face of knowledge gaps is thus a promising strategy to mitigate hallucinations in multilingual settings. However, previous studies on LLM abstention primarily focus on English; we find that directly applying existing solutions beyond English results in up to 20.5% performance gaps between high and low-resource languages, potentially due to LLMs' drop in calibration and reasoning beyond a few resource-rich languages. To this end, we propose strategies to enhance LLM abstention by learning from multilingual feedback, where LLMs self-reflect on proposed answers in one language by generating multiple feedback items in related languages: we show that this helps identifying the knowledge gaps across diverse languages, cultures, and communities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our multilingual feedback approach outperforms various strong baselines, achieving up to 9.2% improvement for low-resource languages across three black-box and open models on three datasets, featuring open-book, closed-book, and commonsense QA. Further analysis reveals that multilingual feedback is both an effective and a more equitable abstain strategy to serve diverse language speakers, and cultural factors have great impact on language selection and LLM abstention behavior, highlighting future directions for multilingual and multi-cultural reliable language modeling.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaboration
Shangbin Feng, Weijia Shi, Yike Wang, Wenxuan Ding, Vidhisha Balachandran, Yulia Tsvetkov
Despite efforts to expand the knowledge of large language models (LLMs), knowledge gaps -- missing or outdated information in LLMs -- might always persist given the evolving nature of knowledge. In this work, we study approaches to identify LLM knowledge gaps and abstain from answering questions when knowledge gaps are present. We first adapt existing approaches to model calibration or adaptation through fine-tuning/prompting and analyze their ability to abstain from generating low-confidence outputs. Motivated by their failures in self-reflection and over-reliance on held-out sets, we propose two novel approaches that are based on model collaboration, i.e., LLMs probing other LLMs for knowledge gaps, either cooperatively or competitively. Extensive experiments with three LLMs on four QA tasks featuring diverse knowledge domains demonstrate that both cooperative and competitive approaches to unveiling LLM knowledge gaps achieve up to 19.3% improvements on abstain accuracy against the strongest baseline. Further analysis reveals that our proposed mechanisms could help identify failure cases in retrieval augmentation and pinpoint knowledge gaps in multi-hop reasoning.
Read more7/2/2024
0
Do LLMs Know When to NOT Answer? Investigating Abstention Abilities of Large Language Models
Nishanth Madhusudhan, Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan, Vikas Yadav, Masoud Hashemi
As Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance across various NLP tasks, their reliability becomes essential for widespread adoption. This paper focuses on Abstention Ability (AA), a critical yet under explored aspect of reliability - the ability of LLMs to refrain from answering questions when they are uncertain or when definitive answer is not possible, while maintaining question-answering (QA) task performance. While previous works have focused on understanding the recollection abilities of LLMs or their ability to identify imponderable/unanswerable questions, we believe there is a need for an effective AA evaluation method. Therefore, we propose a black-box evaluation methodology to examine and understand the AA of LLMs across a variety of multiple-choice QA tasks. We measure AA by rewarding models for abstaining from answering when their predictions are incorrect or when the questions are inherently unanswerable. We investigate three strategies, Strict Prompting, Verbal Confidence Thresholding, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT), to understand their impact on abstention across different LLMs. Our findings reveal that while even state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 struggle with abstention, strategic prompting such as CoT, can significantly enhance this ability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that improving AA also leads to better overall QA task performance, underscoring the importance of evaluating AA in LLMs.
Read more7/24/2024
0
The Art of Refusal: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models
Bingbing Wen, Jihan Yao, Shangbin Feng, Chenjun Xu, Yulia Tsvetkov, Bill Howe, Lucy Lu Wang
Abstention, the refusal of large language models (LLMs) to provide an answer, is increasingly recognized for its potential to mitigate hallucinations and enhance safety in building LLM systems. In this survey, we introduce a framework to examine abstention behavior from three perspectives: the query, the model, and human values. We review the literature on abstention methods (categorized based on the development stages of LLMs), benchmarks, and evaluation metrics, and discuss the merits and limitations of prior work. We further identify and motivate areas for future research, such as encouraging the study of abstention as a meta-capability across tasks and customizing abstention abilities based on context. In doing so, we aim to broaden the scope and impact of abstention methodologies in AI systems.
Read more7/29/2024