Artificial Agency and Large Language Models

Overview

• The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked philosophical debates about the possibility of artificial agency.
• This paper presents a theoretical model that can be used as a threshold conception for artificial agents.
• The model defines agents as systems influenced by a dynamic framework of factors, including their history, adaptive repertoire, and external environment.
• The paper argues that current state-of-the-art LLMs are not yet agents, but that there are elements that suggest a way forward.
• The paper proposes a combination of the agent architecture presented in Park et al. (2023) and the use of modules like the Coscientist in Boiko et al. (2023) as a potential approach to realize artificial agency.

Plain English Explanation

The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to philosophical discussions about whether these systems could ever achieve true agency - the ability to act independently and pursue their own goals. This paper contributes to this debate by proposing a theoretical model that defines what it means for an artificial system to be considered an "agent."

According to the model, an agent is a system whose actions and goals are always influenced by a dynamic framework of factors. This framework includes the system's past experiences and knowledge (its "accessible history"), its ability to adapt and learn new skills (its "adaptive repertoire"), and the external environment it operates in. Crucially, this framework also influences the actions the system takes and the goals it forms, creating a feedback loop.

The paper argues that while current state-of-the-art LLMs do not yet meet the criteria to be considered true agents, they do possess some elements that suggest a way forward. The authors propose that combining the agent architecture described in Park et al. (2023) with the use of modules like the "Coscientist" from Boiko et al. (2023) could potentially be a path to realizing artificial agency.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a theoretical model that defines agents as systems whose actions and goals are always influenced by a dynamic framework of factors. This framework consists of three key elements:

1. Accessible History: The system's past experiences and accumulated knowledge, which shape its current state and future actions.
2. Adaptive Repertoire: The system's ability to adapt and learn new skills, which allows it to expand its capabilities over time.
3. External Environment: The external conditions and circumstances in which the system operates, which can also influence its actions and goals.

Importantly, this framework is not static, but rather a dynamic system that is influenced by the actions the agent takes and the goals it forms. This creates a feedback loop, where the agent's actions and goals shape the framework, which then influences future actions and goals.

The paper argues that while current state-of-the-art LLMs do not yet meet the criteria to be considered true agents, they do possess some elements that suggest a way forward. Specifically, the authors propose that combining the agent architecture described in Park et al. (2023) with the use of modules like the "Coscientist" from Boiko et al. (2023) could potentially be a path to realizing artificial agency.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling theoretical model for defining artificial agency, which could have important implications for the field of AI and the ongoing debate around the nature of intelligence and autonomy. However, the authors acknowledge that there are significant obstacles to building such an artificial agent, and they do not provide a detailed roadmap or implementation details.

One potential limitation of the model is that it may be difficult to operationalize and measure the various elements of the dynamic framework, such as the agent's "accessible history" and "adaptive repertoire." Additionally, the feedback loop between the agent's actions, goals, and framework may be complex and difficult to predict or control.

Further research is needed to explore the practical feasibility of the proposed approach, as well as to address any potential ethical or safety concerns that may arise from the development of artificial agents with increasing levels of autonomy and agency.

Conclusion

This paper presents a thought-provoking theoretical model that could serve as a foundation for realizing artificial agency. By defining agents as systems whose actions and goals are influenced by a dynamic framework of factors, the authors provide a conceptual framework for understanding the key elements required for an artificial system to exhibit agentic behavior.

While current state-of-the-art LLMs do not yet meet the criteria for artificial agency, the authors suggest that a combination of advanced agent architectures and specialized modules could be a promising path forward. As the field of AI continues to evolve, this research highlights the importance of carefully considering the philosophical and practical implications of developing increasingly autonomous and capable artificial systems.