Artificial Intelligence in Bone Metastasis Analysis: Current Advancements, Opportunities and Challenges

Read original: arXiv:2404.19598 - Published 5/1/2024 by Marwa Afnouch, Fares Bougourzi, Olfa Gaddour, Fadi Dornaika, Abdelmalik Taleb-Ahmed
Total Score

0

🗣️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been widely used in medical imaging analysis, particularly in the area of Bone Metastases (BM) analysis.
  • This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art and advancements for BM analysis using AI techniques.
  • The review covers the clinical and oncologic perspectives of BM, the medical imaging modalities used, and the main BM analysis tasks, including classification, detection, and segmentation.

Plain English Explanation

Advances in computer vision and deep learning have led to the widespread use of AI in medical imaging analysis. This is particularly important for diseases like Bone Metastases (BM), a serious condition where cancer spreads to the bones.

The review paper examines how AI and machine learning techniques are being used to analyze BM in medical images. It covers the medical context of BM, the different imaging methods used, and the key tasks AI can perform, such as classification, detection, and segmentation.

The overall finding is that AI can achieve promising results in BM analysis, which could help clinicians work more efficiently and overcome challenges like time and cost constraints. However, more research is needed to validate the clinical performance of these AI tools and integrate them into routine medical practice.

Technical Explanation

The review starts by highlighting the clinical and oncologic significance of Bone Metastases (BM), a common and complex form of cancer that spreads to the bones. It discusses the various medical imaging modalities used for BM analysis, such as X-rays, CT scans, and MRI, and their respective advantages and limitations.

The paper then focuses on the modern AI-based approaches for BM analysis, covering the three main tasks: classification, detection, and segmentation. For classification, AI models can be trained to distinguish between benign and malignant bone lesions. Detection algorithms can automatically identify the presence and location of BM in medical images. Segmentation techniques can delineate the precise boundaries of BM tumors, which is crucial for treatment planning.

The review analyzes the performance of these AI-powered methods, showing that they can achieve promising results that outperform traditional manual analysis. This suggests that AI has the potential to improve clinician efficiency and overcome time and cost limitations in BM management.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges the need for further research to validate the clinical performance of the AI tools and facilitate their integration into routine clinical practice. Specifically, it highlights the requirement for larger and more diverse datasets, as well as rigorous testing and evaluation of the AI models in real-world clinical settings.

One potential limitation not mentioned in the paper is the interpretability and transparency of the AI models. Many deep learning algorithms can be "black boxes," making it difficult for clinicians to understand the reasoning behind the model's decisions. Addressing this issue through the development of more explainable AI systems could be an important area for future research.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI in medical imaging, such as bias, privacy, and liability concerns. As these technologies become more prevalent, it will be crucial for researchers and policymakers to carefully address these important ethical questions.

Conclusion

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and advancements in the use of AI for Bone Metastases analysis in medical imaging. The results suggest that AI-powered techniques can achieve promising performance in tasks like classification, detection, and segmentation, which could ultimately improve clinician efficiency and patient outcomes.

However, the paper highlights the need for further research to validate the clinical efficacy of these AI tools and facilitate their integration into routine clinical practice. Addressing issues of interpretability, transparency, and ethics will also be crucial as these technologies continue to evolve and become more widely adopted in the medical field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🗣️

Total Score

0

Artificial Intelligence in Bone Metastasis Analysis: Current Advancements, Opportunities and Challenges

Marwa Afnouch, Fares Bougourzi, Olfa Gaddour, Fadi Dornaika, Abdelmalik Taleb-Ahmed

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been widely used in medicine, particularly in the analysis of medical imaging, which has been driven by advances in computer vision and deep learning methods. This is particularly important in overcoming the challenges posed by diseases such as Bone Metastases (BM), a common and complex malignancy of the bones. Indeed, there have been an increasing interest in developing Machine Learning (ML) techniques into oncologic imaging for BM analysis. In order to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art and advancements for BM analysis using artificial intelligence, this review is conducted with the accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Firstly, this review highlights the clinical and oncologic perspectives of BM and the used medical imaging modalities, with discussing their advantages and limitations. Then the review focuses on modern approaches with considering the main BM analysis tasks, which includes: classification, detection and segmentation. The results analysis show that ML technologies can achieve promising performance for BM analysis and have significant potential to improve clinician efficiency and cope with time and cost limitations. Furthermore, there are requirements for further research to validate the clinical performance of ML tools and facilitate their integration into routine clinical practice.

Read more

5/1/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines

Douwe J. Spaanderman (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Matthew Marzetti (Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds, UK), Xinyi Wan (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Andrew F. Scarsbrook (Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK), Philip Robinson (Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK), Edwin H. G. Oei (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Jacob J. Visser (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Robert Hemke (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Kirsten van Langevelde (Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands), David F. Hanff (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Geert J. L. H. van Leenders (Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Cornelis Verhoef (Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Dirk J. Gruuhagen (Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Wiro J. Niessen (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands), Stefan Klein (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Martijn P. A. Starmans (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands)

Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods. The review covered literature from several bibliographic databases, including papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research in peer-reviewed journals focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosing or prognosing primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers for eligibility. Eligible papers were assessed against guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9$pm$7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1$pm$2.1 out of 30. Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. define unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. build on previous work, explainability), evaluation (e.g. evaluating and addressing biases, evaluating AI against best practices), and data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.

Read more

8/23/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

An updated overview of radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods in breast cancer screening and diagnosis

Reza Elahi, Mahdis Nazari

Current imaging methods for diagnosing BC are associated with limited sensitivity and specificity and modest positive predictive power. The recent progress in image analysis using artificial intelligence (AI) has created great promise to improve breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and subtype differentiation. In this case, novel quantitative computational methods, such as radiomics, have been developed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of early BC diagnosis and classification. The potential of radiomics in improving the diagnostic efficacy of imaging studies has been shown in several studies. In this review article, we discuss the radiomics workflow and current hand-crafted radiomics methods in the diagnosis and classification of BC based on most recent studies on different imaging modalities, e.g. MRI, mammography, contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), ultrasound imaging, and digital breast tumosynthesis (DBT). We also discuss current challenges and potential strategies to improve the specificity and sensitivity of radiomics in breast cancer to help achieve a higher level of BC classification and diagnosis in the clinical setting. The growing field of AI incorporation with imaging information has opened a great opportunity to provide a higher level of care for BC patients.

Read more

6/24/2024

Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques
Total Score

0

Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques

Samita Bai, Sidra Nasir, Rizwan Ahmed Khan, Sheeraz Arif, Alexandre Meyer, Hubert Konik

Breast cancer (BC) stands as one of the most common malignancies affecting women worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic methodologies for better clinical outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive exploration of the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies continue to permeate the healthcare sector, particularly in oncology, the need for transparent and interpretable models becomes imperative to enhance clinical decision-making and patient care. This review discusses the integration of various XAI approaches, such as SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, and others, with machine learning and deep learning models utilized in breast cancer detection and classification. By investigating the modalities of breast cancer datasets, including mammograms, ultrasounds and their processing with AI, the paper highlights how XAI can lead to more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. It also examines the challenges in implementing these techniques and the importance of developing standardized metrics for evaluating XAI's effectiveness in clinical settings. Through detailed analysis and discussion, this article aims to highlight the potential of XAI in bridging the gap between complex AI models and practical healthcare applications, thereby fostering trust and understanding among medical professionals and improving patient outcomes.

Read more

6/4/2024