Ask-before-Plan: Proactive Language Agents for Real-World Planning
2406.12639
0
0
Abstract
The evolution of large language models (LLMs) has enhanced the planning capabilities of language agents in diverse real-world scenarios. Despite these advancements, the potential of LLM-powered agents to comprehend ambiguous user instructions for reasoning and decision-making is still under exploration. In this work, we introduce a new task, Proactive Agent Planning, which requires language agents to predict clarification needs based on user-agent conversation and agent-environment interaction, invoke external tools to collect valid information, and generate a plan to fulfill the user's demands. To study this practical problem, we establish a new benchmark dataset, Ask-before-Plan. To tackle the deficiency of LLMs in proactive planning, we propose a novel multi-agent framework, Clarification-Execution-Planning (texttt{CEP}), which consists of three agents specialized in clarification, execution, and planning. We introduce the trajectory tuning scheme for the clarification agent and static execution agent, as well as the memory recollection mechanism for the dynamic execution agent. Extensive evaluations and comprehensive analyses conducted on the Ask-before-Plan dataset validate the effectiveness of our proposed framework.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a new approach called "Ask-before-Plan" for developing proactive language agents that can engage in real-world planning tasks.
- The key idea is to have the agent proactively ask clarifying questions before attempting to plan, in order to better understand the user's intent and the context of the planning task.
- This contrasts with traditional planning systems that assume a complete understanding of the task upfront.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to build AI "assistant" systems that can help plan and carry out real-world tasks. The key insight is that these systems should be proactive - that is, they should ask clarifying questions
Traditional AI planning systems assume they already know everything they need to know about a task upfront. But in the real world, there's often a lot of ambiguity and missing information. The "Ask-before-Plan" approach has the AI system ask questions to better understand the user's goals and the context,
This makes the AI system more adaptable and better able to handle the complexity of real-world situations, where there's often a lot of uncertainty. By asking questions first, the system can make sure it's on the right track before it starts planning.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new architecture for building proactive language agents that can engage in real-world planning tasks. The key innovation is the "Ask-before-Plan" approach, where the agent proactively asks clarifying questions before attempting to generate a plan.
This contrasts with traditional planning systems, which assume a complete understanding of the task upfront. In the real world, there is often significant ambiguity and missing information that can undermine the effectiveness of such rigid planning approaches.
The "Ask-before-Plan" system first generates a set of clarifying questions based on the initial planning prompt. It then uses language understanding to analyze the user's responses and update its understanding of the task and context. Only then does it proceed to generate a plan of action.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a series of user studies, showing that it leads to higher-quality plans that better match the user's intent, compared to a baseline planning-only approach.
Critical Analysis
The "Ask-before-Plan" approach proposed in this paper represents an important step forward in developing language agents that can handle the complexities of real-world planning tasks. By proactively seeking to clarify the user's intent and the task context, the system is able to generate plans that are better aligned with the user's actual needs.
That said, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the clarifying question generation process is not described in detail, and it's unclear how well it would scale to more open-ended planning scenarios.
Additionally, the user studies were conducted in relatively constrained settings. It would be valuable to see how the "Ask-before-Plan" approach performs in more complex, multi-step planning tasks that involve greater ambiguity and uncertainty.
Overall, this paper makes a compelling case for the value of proactive, question-asking language agents in the context of real-world planning. However, further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and broader applicability of this approach.
Conclusion
The "Ask-before-Plan" paper presents an innovative approach to developing language agents that can engage in effective real-world planning. By having the agent proactively ask clarifying questions before attempting to generate a plan, the system is able to better understand the user's intent and the context of the task.
This contrasts with traditional planning systems that assume a complete understanding upfront, which can lead to suboptimal plans in the face of real-world ambiguity and uncertainty. The experimental results demonstrate the advantages of the "Ask-before-Plan" approach, though further research is needed to fully explore its potential and limitations.
Ultimately, this work represents an important step forward in the development of more adaptable and user-centric AI planning systems, with potential applications across a wide range of domains where language-based planning is required.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
What's the Plan? Evaluating and Developing Planning-Aware Techniques for Language Models
Eran Hirsch, Guy Uziel, Ateret Anaby-Tavor
0
0
Planning is a fundamental task in artificial intelligence that involves finding a sequence of actions that achieve a specified goal in a given environment. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for applications that require planning capabilities, such as web or embodied agents. In line with recent studies, we demonstrate through experimentation that LLMs lack necessary skills required for planning. Based on these observations, we advocate for the potential of a hybrid approach that combines LLMs with classical planning methodology. Then, we introduce SimPlan, a novel hybrid-method, and evaluate its performance in a new challenging setup. Our extensive experiments across various planning domains demonstrate that SimPlan significantly outperforms existing LLM-based planners.
5/24/2024
💬
TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents
Jian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu, Renze Lou, Yuandong Tian, Yanghua Xiao, Yu Su
0
0
Planning has been part of the core pursuit for artificial intelligence since its conception, but earlier AI agents mostly focused on constrained settings because many of the cognitive substrates necessary for human-level planning have been lacking. Recently, language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown interesting capabilities such as tool use and reasoning. Are these language agents capable of planning in more complex settings that are out of the reach of prior AI agents? To advance this investigation, we propose TravelPlanner, a new planning benchmark that focuses on travel planning, a common real-world planning scenario. It provides a rich sandbox environment, various tools for accessing nearly four million data records, and 1,225 meticulously curated planning intents and reference plans. Comprehensive evaluations show that the current language agents are not yet capable of handling such complex planning tasks-even GPT-4 only achieves a success rate of 0.6%. Language agents struggle to stay on task, use the right tools to collect information, or keep track of multiple constraints. However, we note that the mere possibility for language agents to tackle such a complex problem is in itself non-trivial progress. TravelPlanner provides a challenging yet meaningful testbed for future language agents.
6/26/2024
RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents
Weizhe Chen, Sven Koenig, Bistra Dilkina
0
0
In this past year, large language models (LLMs) have had remarkable success in domains outside the traditional natural language processing, and people are starting to explore the usage of LLMs in more general and close to application domains like code generation, travel planning, and robot controls. Connecting these LLMs with great capacity and external tools, people are building the so-called LLM agents, which are supposed to help people do all kinds of work in everyday life. In all these domains, the prompt to the LLMs has been shown to make a big difference in what the LLM would generate and thus affect the performance of the LLM agents. Therefore, automatic prompt engineering has become an important question for many researchers and users of LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel method, textsc{RePrompt}, which does gradient descent to optimize the step-by-step instructions in the prompt of the LLM agents based on the chat history obtained from interactions with LLM agents. By optimizing the prompt, the LLM will learn how to plan in specific domains. We have used experiments in PDDL generation and travel planning to show that our method could generally improve the performance for different reasoning tasks when using the updated prompt as the initial prompt.
6/18/2024
Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Bernd Bohnet, Azade Nova, Aaron T Parisi, Kevin Swersky, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai, Dale Schuurmans, Noah Fiedel, Hanie Sedghi
0
0
We seek to elevate the planning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)investigating four main directions. First, we construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning domains and natural language scenarios. This suite includes algorithms to generate instances with varying levels of difficulty, allowing for rigorous and systematic evaluation of LLM performance. Second, we investigate the use of in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM planning, exploring the direct relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance. Third, we demonstrate the positive impact of fine-tuning LLMs on optimal planning paths, as well as the effectiveness of incorporating model-driven search procedures. Finally, we investigate the performance of the proposed methods in out-of-distribution scenarios, assessing the ability to generalize to novel and unseen planning challenges.
6/21/2024